Another OSS project ends

2004-03-02 Thread Kenneth E. Lussier
In case people missed this, the FreeS/WAN project has decided to end
development. They have posted a letter stating their reasons here
http://www.freeswan.org/ending_letter.html . I, for one, am very sad to
see the project end, as it is one of the best IPSec implementations, and
they were quite open about how and why they made the design choices that
they did.   

 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Another OSS project ends

2004-03-02 Thread Dan Jenkins
Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:

In case people missed this, the FreeS/WAN project has decided to end
development. They have posted a letter stating their reasons here
http://www.freeswan.org/ending_letter.html . I, for one, am very sad to
see the project end, as it is one of the best IPSec implementations, and
they were quite open about how and why they made the design choices that
they did.   
 

It's already been picked up and the project is now named OpenSWAN with 
code available here:
http://www.openswan.org/
Apparently it had already forked.

Death [of a project] is not final for open source. (Disinterest in a 
project might kill it, but the source lives on, FWIW.)

--
Dan Jenkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Rastech Inc., Bedford, NH, USA --- 1-603-624-7272
*** Technical Support for over a Quarter Century
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss


Re: Another OSS project ends

2004-03-02 Thread Kenneth E. Lussier
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 08:43, Dan Jenkins wrote:


 It's already been picked up and the project is now named OpenSWAN with 
 code available here:
 http://www.openswan.org/
 Apparently it had already forked.

FreeS/WAN has been forked many times over the past five years. Usually
it is because of their refusal to accept patches or code of any kind
from anyone in the U.S. KAME and USAGI are both based on FS, but they
used the 1.9 tree as their base, and they excluded the Opertunistic
Encryption. I'll have to take a look at the OpenSwan project to see how
they have progressed. 
 
 Death [of a project] is not final for open source. (Disinterest in a 
 project might kill it, but the source lives on, FWIW.)

This is true. It is, IMNSHO, one of the best aspects of F/OSS. Even if
the license is changed to make it no longer F/OSS, the previous releases
will always remain, and if the project is good enough, then it will be
picked up. 

C-Ya,
Kenny


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part