Re: Power consumption (was: free to good home, 19 CRT)

2005-04-17 Thread Randy Edwards
  Compared to the cost of a few hundred bucks for a nice new panel display,
  that doesn't exactly blow me away.  Of course, there are other 
  factors in a panel, including physical space savings and waste heat [...]

   Your and Paul's analysis of the costs of the monitor are spot-on -- it's 
what we geeks do best.  This sort of micro cost analysis is fairly easy.

   But if one injects energy/social/political/environmental factors into the 
equation things quickly become less black-and-white and also potentially more 
important.

   For example, today an increasing number of people -- economists, oil 
industry analysts, and (what a shocker!) even a rare politician -- are 
convinced that we're in or near the age of Peak Oil (aka Hubbert's Peak; the 
world's historical peak of oil production).  We've seen oil prices go up more 
than 25% in less than three months and fifty per cent over the last year; 
400% since 1999.  Some predict a doubling of the price of oil in the near 
future.  These oil prices directly impact electricity prices.

   Forget the environmental concerns, if we look at just the economic aspect 
energy prices will be increasing dramatically and are very unlikely to ever 
come down.  Since the US has no energy program other than to take military 
control of Mid East and Caspian Basin oil supplies (a strategy that isn't 
going so well), there are more dark clouds on the horizon.

   As such, purchasing an appliance that saves over 50% of energy compared to 
its equivalent is a wise investment and easily trumps a cost-benefit analysis 
done exclusively on today's energy prices.

 Regards,
 .
 Randy

-- 
Fascism could better be called 'corporatism', for it is merely the merging of 
state power with corporate power. -- Benito Mussolini, the Italian dictator 
who invented fascism
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss


RE: Power consumption (was: free to good home, 19 CRT)

2005-04-17 Thread Brian
Ah, but that new appliance wasn't produced for free.  It was made in an
energy-consuming factory, most likely by people that drove their cars to
work.  And then it got from the factory to you the consumer via trucks and
trains and ship that also burn fuel.  

You probably added to the landfill a bunch of plastics and noxious chemicals
also.  Even though the CRT in question was given to a new home, someone most
likely threw out an old screen somewhere down the line because of it.

IMO, you can't really, truly, justify a purchase like that economically,
environmentally, OR politically.



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Randy Edwards
 Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 1:03 PM
 To: gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
 Subject: Re: Power consumption (was: free to good home, 19 CRT)
 
As such, purchasing an appliance that saves over 50% of 
 energy compared to its equivalent is a wise investment and 
 easily trumps a cost-benefit analysis done exclusively on 
 today's energy prices.

___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss


Re: Power consumption (was: free to good home, 19 CRT)

2005-04-17 Thread Bill McGonigle
On Apr 17, 2005, at 13:26, Brian wrote:
IMO, you can't really, truly, justify a purchase like that 
economically,
environmentally, OR politically.
Yeah, but it's sexy, saves desk space, and it's a good enough excuse 
for SWMBO.

More practically, I've never had an LCD lose focus on me.  I've 
scrapped four CRT's in the past decade (dual monitor setup c.1993) due 
to focus issues which cannot be fixed economically.  At least I'm not 
replacing flyback transformers anymore!  If there's a reconditioner 
who's interested in blurry monitors I've not found him yet.

So... presumably I'll be replacing the LCD's less frequently than the 
CRT's (if the bulb lasts) which will put fewer pounds of total material 
and quite a bit less lead on the landfill.  If the argument surrounds a 
single upgrade it's harder to defend, but reality is stuff fails at 
frequency f and costs rate x to fix or y to replace and that needs to 
be in the calculation.  It's probably more costly than the electricity 
the unit will use over the lifetime of the unit.

-Bill
P.S.  There are some really good deals on big analog-input panels out 
there during the move to DVI.  The signal rides a good cable and is 
digitized onboard anyhow - if there is any quantization noise error in 
the display either I can't see it or it's outside the performance 
envelope of the panel itself.

-
Bill McGonigle, Owner   Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC  Home: 603.448.1668
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Mobile: 603.252.2606
http://www.bfccomputing.com/Pager: 603.442.1833
AIM: wpmcgonigleSkype: bill_mcgonigle
For fastest support contact, please follow:
http://bfccomputing.com/support_contact.html
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss