Re: [Fwd: SOT: Evolution and gpg signature verification (was: Re: updating gpg keys)]

2002-10-11 Thread Derek D. Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

At some point hitherto, mike ledoux hath spake thusly:
   gpg --keyserver keyserver.kjsl.com --send-key your-key-id

This key server now also seems to be rejecting connections...

- -- 
Derek D. Martin
http://www.pizzashack.org/
GPG Key ID: 0x81CFE75D

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9pzdadjdlQoHP510RApaWAJ0erIpqP1Jp3CpsoX0QjnsL5MVsRACfdUp2
1KEGofuRKy4UDveJ69Q0JBQ=
=HNXc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss



Re: [Fwd: SOT: Evolution and gpg signature verification (was: Re: updating gpg keys)]

2002-10-09 Thread Derek D. Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

At some point hitherto, Paul Iadonisi hath spake thusly:
  gpg: BAD signature from Derek D. Martin (for signing software)
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
Is the warning message about the deprecated --honor-http-proxy option

Maybe...  Easiest way to find out is to get rid of it.  But I don't
think that's the problem.  IIRC, Evolution only supports PGP-MIME,
which I would be more than happy to use, except the rest of the world
(besides Mutt) DOES NOT support it.

- -- 
Derek D. Martin
http://www.pizzashack.org/
GPG Key ID: 0x81CFE75D

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9pH87djdlQoHP510RAoUxAJ92k75md6RKMypg3iY7aWcW2xJ8BQCfYNot
9htjA7SMAXXYFjn8YwP0Vp4=
=WRcW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss



Re: [Fwd: SOT: Evolution and gpg signature verification (was: Re: updating gpg keys)]

2002-10-09 Thread Derek D. Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

At some point hitherto, Paul Iadonisi hath spake thusly:
  gpg: BAD signature from Derek D. Martin (for signing software)
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
Is the warning message about the deprecated --honor-http-proxy
option

Maybe...  Easiest way to find out is to get rid of it.  But I don't
think that's the problem.  IIRC, Evolution only supports PGP-MIME,
which I would be more than happy to use, except the rest of the world
(besides Mutt) DOES NOT support it.  That might be the problem.  Or,
it could just be a bug in Evolution.

- -- 
Derek D. Martin
http://www.pizzashack.org/
GPG Key ID: 0x81CFE75D

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9pIAcdjdlQoHP510RAimtAKCibvmkmGPJyjvxvf2hwby4kxzvtgCgtWv2
+ZecYg5Wx6He14JI5mo3euE=
=WuqU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss



Re: [Fwd: SOT: Evolution and gpg signature verification (was: Re: updating gpg keys)]

2002-10-09 Thread Derek D. Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

At some point hitherto, Derek D. Martin hath spake thusly:
  gpg --keyserver keyserver.kjsl.com --send-key your-key-id
 
 I just did this.  You may want to try it again.  =8^)

It didn't help me... when I update my own key, I still get an invalid
subkey binding.

- -- 
Derek D. Martin
http://www.pizzashack.org/
GPG Key ID: 0x81CFE75D

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9pIicdjdlQoHP510RAo+JAJ9l8408PVGRtktYwSpaLh+L+CaXoQCgm06I
lt8NYewNDcxETLNFd65G0FY=
=hC4t
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss