Re: Speakeasy DSL

2004-09-10 Thread David Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, at 1:51pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

The only problem I've had was the initial install.  Verizon came out to
the house and ran two new lines (don't ask me why)
   

 *Two* new lines is rather odd.  Typically, Covad DSL (which is what
Speakeasy is using) brings in DSL on a dedicated line, so that means a new
loop has to be provisioned from Verizon.  This is in contrast to Verizon's
DSL, which typically piggy-backs on an existing POTS loop.
 

I *think* Verizon ran two new lines to replace the
two *old* lines, even though I was dropping the
second phone (used primarily for dial-up).  All I
know is I came home one day to find both wires had
been changed and the Covad guy used second one for
the DSL modem when he did his part.  Now I have a
dedicated line each for the phone and the DSL
modem.  I decided to just let it ride, keep an eye
on the bills, and not ask any questions (I hate
that glazed look you sometimes get when asking
questions).
dlr
--
Linux: Because a PC is a terrible thing to waste.
  -- As seen on the 'net --
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss


Re: Speakeasy DSL

2004-09-09 Thread bscott
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, at 1:51pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The only problem I've had was the initial install.  Verizon came out to
 the house and ran two new lines (don't ask me why)

  *Two* new lines is rather odd.  Typically, Covad DSL (which is what
Speakeasy is using) brings in DSL on a dedicated line, so that means a new
loop has to be provisioned from Verizon.  This is in contrast to Verizon's
DSL, which typically piggy-backs on an existing POTS loop.

-- 
Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do  |
| not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. |
| All information is provided without warranty of any kind.  |


___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss


Re: Speakeasy DSL

2004-09-02 Thread Brian Chabot

Drew wrote:
Someone suggested SpeakEasy was an iffy DSL source... I've had SpeakEasy for
several years at four different locations now, and the only complaint I have
is on price. 
I'm going to jump in and whole heartedly agree with you.
I've had Speakeasy DSL since Flushcom - err... Flashcom went under.
Speakeasy has been more stable than most T1's I've worked with and their 
tech support knows what they are talking about. (...As opposed to 
Flashcom's support, who's second tier didn't know the difference between 
SNMP and SMTP...)

I run all kinds of servers, and, for a while, was even maxing out my 
upload bandwidth due to a very populae web site I used to host.  They 
didn't mind.  I've had one abuse complaint when a server I colo got 
broken into, and they were good about providing log excerpts.

I'm paying through the nose for my line, but with the reliability, 
$300/mo with 8 IP's for 1.1MB SDSL is still better than a T1.

Verizon will be cheaper for the speed, but their TOS specifically forbade
running servers last time I checked.
Yup.  And their sales people don't even know what a static IP is.
 Also, Speakeasy is perfectly happy to
hear that you use Linux, they're comfortable with it, and don't require you
have a Windows machine to install any software on.  During debug on the
occasion I was experiencing intermittent disconnects, the tech support guy
even knew ifconfig and other *nix utilities...turns out the upstream
junction box on our line had a cracked seal and was half-full of water.
Yup.  I've been very happy with their techs.  They don't even blink when 
I tell them I'm running Linux.  They *did* blink when I told them how I 
configured my router, though. To quote, You can *DO* that? (I have a 
really funky setup combining NAT and static IP's that uses the best of 
both worlds and maximizes the use of the IP's I have, so in effect I can 
have my 8 IP's (7 usable!) and the rest of my network NAT'd without the 
need for a second router...)

Brian
--
---
|   [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.hirebrian.net  |
|Simply the Best IT/MIS Manager   |
|  Self-taught, Fast Learner, and Team Player |
|Ready to Start TODAY at Your Company.|
---
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss


Re: Speakeasy DSL

2004-09-02 Thread David Roberts
Drew wrote:
Someone suggested SpeakEasy was an iffy DSL source... I've had SpeakEasy for
several years at four different locations now, and the only complaint I have
is on price.  Where I am now, 1.5Mbps/768Kbps is $80/month (with 8 static
IP's and NO service restrictions) and I'm told for $100/mo I can get
6Mbps/768Kbps service.
 

I too wish the price was a little lower, but I have been with them
for over 5 years now due to the fact I get multiple static IP's, no
server bans, free access to their knowledge base, and they don't
have any Non-Windows limitations (expressed or implied ;)
Verizon will be cheaper for the speed, but their TOS specifically forbade
running servers last time I checked.  Also, Speakeasy is perfectly happy to
hear that you use Linux, they're comfortable with it, and don't require you
have a Windows machine to install any software on.  During debug on the
occasion I was experiencing intermittent disconnects, the tech support guy
even knew ifconfig and other *nix utilities...turns out the upstream
junction box on our line had a cracked seal and was half-full of water.
 

yup - a co-worker of mine *was* using verizon - until they closed
off some more ports on his residential service last week causing
his mail server to die - a little speakeasy hype on my part and he
swapped that same day (and says it has doubled his bandwidth, for
less money).
I agree with your take on speakeasy - they have no fear of allowing
servers and love Linux (the tech support people I remember speaking
to were Linux users themselves, answering any question I posed).
The only problem I've had was the initial install.  Verizon came out
to the house and ran two new lines (don't ask me why), Covad did the
interior install, and on rainy days the line would drop out.  Covad
came back out after I complained to speakeasy and found where Verizon
had botched their end of the job and fixed it.  BUT the *really good*
part of the whole story was the fact that until the problem was fixed
Speakeasy did not charge me the monthly fee - even though the line
was fine on good days (probably 90-95% of the time)...
Just my $0.02
 

--Drew Thompson Van Zandt
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
 


--
Linux: Because a PC is a terrible thing to waste.
  -- As seen on the 'net --
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss