Re: Since I'm feeling lucky, how about another sendmail question?
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, at 4:31pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanks, but no. What I want is to reject in sendmail. I don't even use > procmail for spam processing since I'm using spamass-milter. The goal is > to reject all spam before reception completes. Ahhh. The dream of mail admins everywhere. Someone else already posted a SpamAssassin rule. As I said before, just make sure you don't do SMTP rejects on anything coming from your secondary MX. Silently discard such spam. Anything else, and you backscatter the whole world. That tends to double the spam problem. It can also get *you* marked as a spammer, since now your system is emitting spam-like messages. Spam backscatter is as bad as spam. Worse, in some ways. Don't make things worse. Ben, who has been the victim of joe-jobs before. -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: Since I'm feeling lucky, how about another sendmail question?
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, at 4:23pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If your using the milter, why not configure the secondary to use the > milter as well? That's the way to do it, for sure, but the OP said he was using some third party secondary MX service, which I expect won't give him the control he wants. -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: Since I'm feeling lucky, how about another sendmail question?
On Nov 18, 2004, at 16:31, Steven W. Orr wrote: Thanks, but no. What I want is to reject in sendmail. I don't even use procmail for spam processing since I'm using spamass-milter. score FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS +5 ? If you really need 124ABC@ as valid, perhaps a rule like: header FROM_IS_NUMSFrom =~ /^\d+\@/ describe FROM_IS_NUMS From: from is nums (untested) -Bill Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440 BFC Computing, LLC Home: 603.448.1668 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 603.252.2606 http://www.bfccomputing.com/Text: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: wpmcgonigleSkype: bill_mcgonigle ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: Since I'm feeling lucky, how about another sendmail question?
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Steven W. Orr wrote: > On Thursday, Nov 18th 2004 at 15:45 -0500, quoth Benjamin Scott: > > =>On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, at 4:55pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > =>> I want to reject all incoming email which is addressed to my domain and > =>> has a completly numeric address > =>> > =>> e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > =>> > =>> Anyone have a recipe? > => > =>:0: > =>* [EMAIL PROTECTED] > =>/dev/null > > Thanks, but no. What I want is to reject in sendmail. I don't even use > procmail for spam processing since I'm using spamass-milter. The goal is > to reject all spam before reception completes. If your using the milter, why not configure the secondary to use the milter as well? I do this with a different milter that I use. It's been a while since I looked at it, but you could have them both use the same spamd as well. Ed > -- > Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have .0. > happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0 > Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000 > individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question? > steveo at syslang.net > ___ > gnhlug-discuss mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss > ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: Since I'm feeling lucky, how about another sendmail question?
On Thursday, Nov 18th 2004 at 15:45 -0500, quoth Benjamin Scott: =>On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, at 4:55pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: =>> I want to reject all incoming email which is addressed to my domain and =>> has a completly numeric address =>> =>> e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] =>> =>> Anyone have a recipe? => =>:0: =>* [EMAIL PROTECTED] =>/dev/null Thanks, but no. What I want is to reject in sendmail. I don't even use procmail for spam processing since I'm using spamass-milter. The goal is to reject all spam before reception completes. -- Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have .0. happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0 Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000 individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question? steveo at syslang.net ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Re: Since I'm feeling lucky, how about another sendmail question?
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, at 4:55pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I want to reject all incoming email which is addressed to my domain and > has a completly numeric address > > e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Anyone have a recipe? :0: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Since I'm feeling lucky, how about another sendmail question?
I want to reject all incoming email which is addressed to my domain and has a completly numeric address e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anyone have a recipe? -- Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have .0. happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0 Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000 individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question? steveo at syslang.net ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
