I don't seen any reason to hold it back. My only question would be for the submission I made. I submitted two methods for doing modal dialogs: gnoga.gui.modal_dialog and gnoga.gui.view.modal_dialog. It probably isn't good to have both methods as it might be confusing. Should we axe one? I was hoping people would have a chance to use it and provide feedback on which method they prefer
Either way, I think it is stable enough for beta On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 10:24 PM Pascal via Gnoga-list < gnoga-list@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hello, > > Up to now here is the list of new features of GNOGA V1.5 alpha (versus > 1.4): > - Update Jeff Carter's Pragmarc and demos from Github > - Upgrade to Simple Components 4.40 > - Canvas: add additional binding to drawImage > - PIXI.Sprite: recursive rendering of sprite's children. > - PIXI.Sprite: modification for finalizing children > - Add log of user agent and platform client browser in case of suspicious > connections > - Make favicon customization available by the application. > - Add an exception handler when a requested file is non existent on the > server side > - Support multi-part bodies for POST forms > - Add Profile build mode and tidy some GPR project files. > - Fix POST UTF-8 key, UTF-8 to Latin-1 translation, UTF8 incoming message. > - Console_IO: improve responsiveness of Get_Line > - Canvas_2D: add Polygon_To; Plotting_2D: use Polygon_To > > There are available on Gnoga SF repo: > https://sourceforge.net/p/gnoga/code/ci/dev_1.5/tree/ > > I propose to move in beta status for more testing unless you propose some > additional features to add. > What is your feedback? > > Thanks, Pascal. > http://blady.pagesperso-orange.fr > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnoga-list mailing list > Gnoga-list@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnoga-list >
_______________________________________________ Gnoga-list mailing list Gnoga-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnoga-list
