Re: Norwegian language codes
I queried what I thought was a typo in the gossip PO file, and the
developer said:
About #5. I am not sure about this.
I originally took this list from GtkSpell I think.
Anyway, the entries in question are:
nn, N_(Norwegian (Nynorsk)),
nn_NO, N_(Norwegian (Nyorsk)),
so there is clearly a difference between the language code.
Are these both distinct Norwegian language codes? I haven't encountered
Nyorsk before, so I thought I should check.
Nyorsk is a typo. It should be Nynorsk. I'm not sure if it's
necessary to have both lang codes (I only make nn.no-files, never
nn_NO.po, and there's no significant use of Nynorsk outside Norway
that I'm aware of).
--
Åsmund Skjæveland {
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
}
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: gnome-doc-utils changes
Today at 8:48, Clytie Siddall wrote: Shaun, haven't you just reverted the previous lot of changes? It looks like we've just changed back to where we were before. No, it was my fault: i18n-status.gnome.org uses buggy version of intltool which caused problems for gnome-doc-utils (dropped XML attributes in msgid's) :( Guys, sorry about that one, I'll try to fix up i18n-status intltool soon. Cheers, Danilo ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: TRANSLATORS: Use i18n-status.gnome.org
Today at 7:26, Clytie Siddall wrote: All working, except the proposed group, which still shows 9th February: It's not generated anymore since accepted modules have been moved to desktop, and all the others to extras on HEAD page; it's just a leftover (you probably went there directly, since you shouldn't be able to browse there from http://l10n-status.gnome.org/gnome-2.14/vi/index.html ). Cheers, Danilo ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: New Georgian coordinator: Vladimer Sichinava
Yesterday at 17:30, Simos Xenitellis wrote: Danilo, is that ok with you? Yes, I'll support them myself. If all ok, Vladimir, follow the instructions at http://developer.gnome.org/doc/policies/accounts/requesting.html (as already mentioned) to get a CVS account. When sending the request, you can cc: those that are happy to support your request (at least myself), so that it gets granted. And include me as well. Christian Rose is on vacation right now, so he can't respond to your queries (he generally can create accounts himself). Cheers, Danilo ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Norwegian language codes
On 21/02/2006, at 7:17 PM, Åsmund Skjæveland wrote: I queried what I thought was a typo in the gossip PO file, and the developer said: About #5. I am not sure about this. I originally took this list from GtkSpell I think. Anyway, the entries in question are: nn, N_(Norwegian (Nynorsk)), nn_NO, N_(Norwegian (Nyorsk)), so there is clearly a difference between the language code. Are these both distinct Norwegian language codes? I haven't encountered Nyorsk before, so I thought I should check. Nyorsk is a typo. It should be Nynorsk. I'm not sure if it's necessary to have both lang codes (I only make nn.no-files, never nn_NO.po, and there's no significant use of Nynorsk outside Norway that I'm aware of). Takk, Åsmund. (Thanks.) It looks like it might be a bug in GtkSpell, which other apps. are following. I've reported back to the gossip developer. from Clytie (vi-VN, Vietnamese free-software translation team / nhóm Việt hóa phần mềm tự do) http://groups-beta.google.com/group/vi-VN ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: TRANSLATORS: Use i18n-status.gnome.org
On 21/02/2006, at 7:57 PM, Danilo Šegan wrote: Today at 7:26, Clytie Siddall wrote: All working, except the proposed group, which still shows 9th February: It's not generated anymore since accepted modules have been moved to desktop, and all the others to extras on HEAD page; it's just a leftover (you probably went there directly, since you shouldn't be able to browse there from http://l10n-status.gnome.org/gnome-2.14/vi/index.html No, I have those pages open permanently in my browser. ;) It's good to know I can close one tab now! хвала, Данило. (Thanks, Danilo.) :) from Clytie (vi-VN, Vietnamese free-software translation team / nhóm Việt hóa phần mềm tự do) http://groups-beta.google.com/group/vi-VN ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Changes to Epiphany following UI review
Hi all, Following Monday's UI review we have committed most of the changes to Epiphany. User interface changes include almost all those presented prior to the review, plus some other minor items: * http://home.exetel.com.au/harvey/epiphany/toolbar/ * An extra separator in the toolbar context menu when editing. * Use a regular expander widget for the topics palette. String changes are: * Changed Hide “%s” to Show “_%s” * Changed _Remove Toolbar to _Delete Toolbar * Changed _Show Toolbars to _Hide Toolbars * Added an expander Sho_w all topics * Changed Properties to _Properties Thanks, Peter. ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: CVS-Georgia
Thank You All for your support! On 21/02/2006, at 3:00 AM, Simos Xenitellis wrote: Personally I would be happy to support Vladimir to get a GNOME CVS account straight away. Danilo, is that ok with you? If all ok, Vladimir, follow the instructions at http://developer.gnome.org/doc/policies/accounts/requesting.html (as already mentioned) to get a CVS account. When sending the request, you can cc: those that are happy to support your request (at least myself), so that it gets granted. I would support that also: please cc. me if I can help. I would also be willing to commit some files for the Georgian team until they get their CVS working. ;)Thank You Clytie! http://svn.inet.ge/svn/ka_GE/gnome/ Here our fresh translations. And thank you for commiting! from Clytie (vi-VN, Vietnamese free-software translation team / nhóm Việt hóa phần mềm tự do) http://groups-beta.google.com/group/vi-VN ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n Kisses! ;) ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Fonts for distribution
Hi guys :) Simos suggested I write to Jim Gettys, who very kindly wrote back with helpful info: On 22/02/2006, at 8:06 AM, Jim Gettys wrote: Vera will be having some wider coverage, but still be far from a unicode font. You might look at the fonts that SIL just released, but I suspect they are not hinted for screen use. http://www.sil.org/computing/catalog/show_software.asp?id=112 http://www.sil.org/computing/catalog/show_software.asp?id=91 http://www.sil.org/computing/catalog/show_software.asp?id=83 They've also made gentium available. Gentium with the Open Font Licence is very good news indeed. It is a true Unicode font. I also think Doulos (the second link) is well worth testing. Would you please tell me where we're up to with [the Bistream Vera] negotiation? Can we reopen it with a reasonable chance of success, do you think? Not from Bitstream. I will be poking at other font vendors. I recently poked at Adobe, but it isn't the part of Adobe that deals with fonts, so I have no idea if I'll get anywhere from that attempt. I have wished him luck with that (May the poke be with you), and hopefully we'll hear about it if there is any progress. I personally think that Adobe's assumption that ordinary people can afford to pay $2000 for a program, doesn't indicate much understanding of life in general, much less life in third world countries. We also make clear to governments getting involved in OLPC ($100 laptop) that they need to invest in making fonts available somehow. For example, Thailand is working with Bitstream to bring Thai into the fold. Also an encouraging move. What do you guys think? If we could release Gentium and maybe Doulos with distros, our users have effective, true Unicode fonts which will display all localizations. Everson Mono turns out to be shareware (I don't remember that when I was first pointed to it :( ): http://www.evertype.com/emono/emshareware.html so we are going to need an effective monospaced Unicode font from somewhere. I find Monaco is OK in the terminal, but I suspect it's not free to distribute. Ideas? :) from Clytie (vi-VN, Vietnamese free-software translation team / nhóm Việt hóa phần mềm tự do) http://groups-beta.google.com/group/vi-VN ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
