Re: Feature and string break request

2008-03-18 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 19:19 -0300, Claudio Saavedra wrote:
 El lun, 17-03-2008 a las 23:01 +0100, Vincent Untz escribió:
   I think this is totally acceptable and something we want to see
  happen.
  
  In a stable release?
 
 From a marketing point of view, note that it could also mean that it
 gets less media attention than it deserves, as it's not mentioned in
 current release notes nor in the many articles out there about 2.22.

Well, we could blog about it if we want to pimp it.


___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Feature and string break request

2008-03-18 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 23:17 +0100, Kjartan Maraas wrote:
 ma., 17.03.2008 kl. 23.01 +0100, skrev Vincent Untz:
  Le lundi 17 mars 2008, à 11:07 +0100, Kjartan Maraas a écrit :
   I think this is just a normal effect of finally getting archiving
   support in a library. Different apps that can make use of that will do
   so and thus create an overlap with existing apps that specialize in
   handling archives and nothing else.
   
   I think this is totally acceptable and something we want to see happen.
  
  In a stable release?
  
 Well, gvfs has been a bit of an exception this cycle anyway but I get
 your point. Maybe a bit more information on how visible this will be in
 2.22.x would be good. How will this be used in nautilus and how will it
 affect users?

It will be another another open handler for archive file. Selecting it
will cause the archive to be mounted like any other gvfs mount, visible
in the normal locations.


___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Feature and string break request

2008-03-17 Thread Alexander Larsson

On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 11:56 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:

 For translators: the new string is Archive Mounter.
 
 Alex, your patch doesn't modify POTFILES.in :-)
 
 I'm a bit mixed on the feature freeze break. It sounds harmless and
 more of a good thing. But then it deprecates file-roller in some part
 since it's not needed to read archives anymore... I need to think a bit
 more about this, I guess.

Deprecates is a bit harsh. File roller is still what you want to use for
things like creating an archive or adding a file to an archive. Or even
extracting a whole archive to some place (via the extract archive menu
item in nautilis). Mounting an archive is more when you want to browse
into archives, similar to how you would use loopback mounting of ISO
images. In fact i think the ISO image support is the most important part
of the archive backend.

___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Feature and string break request

2008-03-17 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 17 mars 2008, à 09:57 +0100, Alexander Larsson a écrit :
 
 On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 11:56 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
 
  For translators: the new string is Archive Mounter.
  
  Alex, your patch doesn't modify POTFILES.in :-)
  
  I'm a bit mixed on the feature freeze break. It sounds harmless and
  more of a good thing. But then it deprecates file-roller in some part
  since it's not needed to read archives anymore... I need to think a bit
  more about this, I guess.
 
 Deprecates is a bit harsh. File roller is still what you want to use for
 things like creating an archive or adding a file to an archive. Or even
 extracting a whole archive to some place (via the extract archive menu
 item in nautilis). Mounting an archive is more when you want to browse
 into archives, similar to how you would use loopback mounting of ISO
 images. In fact i think the ISO image support is the most important part
 of the archive backend.

Looks like I didn't emphasizes enough the in some part part of my
sentence :-) It doesn't completely deprecate file-roller, sure, but it
deprecates it for quite some use cases. It could totally replace
file-roller in my personal case, eg.

What do other release team members think?

Vincent

-- 
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Feature and string break request

2008-03-17 Thread Lucas Rocha
Hi,

2008/3/17, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Le lundi 17 mars 2008, à 09:57 +0100, Alexander Larsson a écrit :

 
   On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 11:56 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
  
For translators: the new string is Archive Mounter.
   
Alex, your patch doesn't modify POTFILES.in :-)
   
I'm a bit mixed on the feature freeze break. It sounds harmless and
more of a good thing. But then it deprecates file-roller in some part
since it's not needed to read archives anymore... I need to think a bit
more about this, I guess.
  
   Deprecates is a bit harsh. File roller is still what you want to use for
   things like creating an archive or adding a file to an archive. Or even
   extracting a whole archive to some place (via the extract archive menu
   item in nautilis). Mounting an archive is more when you want to browse
   into archives, similar to how you would use loopback mounting of ISO
   images. In fact i think the ISO image support is the most important part
   of the archive backend.


 Looks like I didn't emphasizes enough the in some part part of my
  sentence :-) It doesn't completely deprecate file-roller, sure, but it
  deprecates it for quite some use cases. It could totally replace
  file-roller in my personal case, eg.

  What do other release team members think?

I'm more concerned about the usability part of this addition. I'm sure
if mounting an archive is an intuitive metaphor for the users.

It would be nice to hear the opinion of someone from usability team.

--lucasr
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Feature and string break request

2008-03-17 Thread Alexander Larsson

On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 12:24 +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote:
 Hi,
 
 2008/3/17, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  Le lundi 17 mars 2008, à 09:57 +0100, Alexander Larsson a écrit :
 
  Looks like I didn't emphasizes enough the in some part part of my
   sentence :-) It doesn't completely deprecate file-roller, sure, but it
   deprecates it for quite some use cases. It could totally replace
   file-roller in my personal case, eg.
 
   What do other release team members think?
 
 I'm more concerned about the usability part of this addition. I'm sure
 if mounting an archive is an intuitive metaphor for the users.

Not that Apple are gods or whatever, but this is what OSX does with e.g.
DMG files. It also maps to what you do with other kinds of things like
network mounts, so the mount concept is not entierly new to users (even
if the mounts are not normally loopback mounts, and loopback is a bit
meta).

I don't think mounting an archive is something a user who have never
seen this before would think of as a possible operation, but once you've
used this feature one time I don't think its particularly hard to
understand (and if you never find this feature that is not a great
problem). However, I don't think there is a better alternative approach.
The only one I can think of is to pretend archives are directories, and
that is fraught with confusion about what is a directory and what is a
file both in the implementation and in the user interface, as well as
lifetime cycle problems.

I'd classify this as a very useful feature for some class of users, and
not very interesting for others. For the second class just make file
roller the default action for archives, and this will never ever show up
to these users unless they look for it. If they do they can then easily
change the default handler for the archive types if they are interested
in often using this feature.


___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Feature and string break request

2008-03-17 Thread Kjartan Maraas
ma., 17.03.2008 kl. 10.47 +0100, skrev Vincent Untz:
 Le lundi 17 mars 2008, à 09:57 +0100, Alexander Larsson a écrit :
  
  On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 11:56 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
  
   For translators: the new string is Archive Mounter.
   
   Alex, your patch doesn't modify POTFILES.in :-)
   
   I'm a bit mixed on the feature freeze break. It sounds harmless and
   more of a good thing. But then it deprecates file-roller in some part
   since it's not needed to read archives anymore... I need to think a bit
   more about this, I guess.
  
  Deprecates is a bit harsh. File roller is still what you want to use for
  things like creating an archive or adding a file to an archive. Or even
  extracting a whole archive to some place (via the extract archive menu
  item in nautilis). Mounting an archive is more when you want to browse
  into archives, similar to how you would use loopback mounting of ISO
  images. In fact i think the ISO image support is the most important part
  of the archive backend.
 
 Looks like I didn't emphasizes enough the in some part part of my
 sentence :-) It doesn't completely deprecate file-roller, sure, but it
 deprecates it for quite some use cases. It could totally replace
 file-roller in my personal case, eg.
 
 What do other release team members think?
 
I think this is just a normal effect of finally getting archiving
support in a library. Different apps that can make use of that will do
so and thus create an overlap with existing apps that specialize in
handling archives and nothing else.

I think this is totally acceptable and something we want to see happen.

Cheers
Kjartan


___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Feature and string break request

2008-03-17 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 17 mars 2008, à 11:07 +0100, Kjartan Maraas a écrit :
 I think this is just a normal effect of finally getting archiving
 support in a library. Different apps that can make use of that will do
 so and thus create an overlap with existing apps that specialize in
 handling archives and nothing else.
 
 I think this is totally acceptable and something we want to see happen.

In a stable release?

Vincent

-- 
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Feature and string break request

2008-03-17 Thread Kjartan Maraas
ma., 17.03.2008 kl. 23.01 +0100, skrev Vincent Untz:
 Le lundi 17 mars 2008, à 11:07 +0100, Kjartan Maraas a écrit :
  I think this is just a normal effect of finally getting archiving
  support in a library. Different apps that can make use of that will do
  so and thus create an overlap with existing apps that specialize in
  handling archives and nothing else.
  
  I think this is totally acceptable and something we want to see happen.
 
 In a stable release?
 
Well, gvfs has been a bit of an exception this cycle anyway but I get
your point. Maybe a bit more information on how visible this will be in
2.22.x would be good. How will this be used in nautilus and how will it
affect users?

Cheers
Kjartan


___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Feature and string break request

2008-03-17 Thread Claudio Saavedra

El lun, 17-03-2008 a las 23:01 +0100, Vincent Untz escribió:
  I think this is totally acceptable and something we want to see
 happen.
 
 In a stable release?

From a marketing point of view, note that it could also mean that it
gets less media attention than it deserves, as it's not mentioned in
current release notes nor in the many articles out there about 2.22.

Claudio

-- 
Claudio Saavedra [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Feature and string break request

2008-03-15 Thread Vincent Untz
cc'ing gnome-i18n, since that's where a string freeze break request
should be sent.

Le vendredi 14 mars 2008, à 16:50 +0100, Alexander Larsson a écrit :
 I recently commited the archive backend written by Benjamin Otte to gvfs
 svn. Its technically a feature freeze break, but not really as the
 feature is hidden and more or less impossible to use as is, and it
 doesn't affect anything else (its a separate binary after all).
 
 However, its a really really neat feature when integrated. Basically
 you'd click (or right click plus select the right menu item) on an
 archive and then you can access it read only from the mount. Much like
 how OSX handles dmg files, only it supports zip, tars, isos, etc.
 
 The integration (in its simplest form, suitable for 2.22) is just a
 non-visible (for the panel menus) desktop file listing the right
 mimetypes as supported that when used (by default on open, or from the
 open with submenu) mounts the archive you selected. [Patch attached]
 
 However, this patch adds one string, and breaks the feature freeze. But
 since this is an imho very useful feature, and is very unlikely to break
 anything else I'd still like to add it to gvfs for gnome 2.22.1. What do
 you think about this?

For translators: the new string is Archive Mounter.

Alex, your patch doesn't modify POTFILES.in :-)

I'm a bit mixed on the feature freeze break. It sounds harmless and
more of a good thing. But then it deprecates file-roller in some part
since it's not needed to read archives anymore... I need to think a bit
more about this, I guess.

Vincent

-- 
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n