Re: Missing/wrong data in release notes

2016-03-22 Thread Alexandre Franke
Forgot to reply to the list.

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Daniel Mustieles García
 wrote:
> Hi,

Hi,

> I've noticed the 3.20 release notes have the same number of contributors and
> changes than 3.18... I guess this is not ok ;-)

 That's because, as usual, it's updated at the last minute to be more accurate.

> Also, there are some missing pictures (shown with a generic placeholder
> image). Are there plans to include them? if not, they should be removed.

They should be updated soon.

-- 
Alexandre Franke
GNOME Hacker & Foundation Director
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Missing/wrong data in release notes

2016-03-22 Thread Andre Klapper
On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 16:09 +0100, Daniel Mustieles García wrote:
> I've noticed the 3.20 release notes have the same number of
> contributors and changes than 3.18... I guess this is not ok ;-)

That is intentional as I'm going to update those numbers later today
(whatever timezone that is in), but thanks for the heads-up! :)

> Also, there are some missing pictures (shown with a generic
> placeholder image). Are there plans to include them? if not, they
> should be removed.

That's probably a question for Allan...

andre
-- 
Andre Klapper  |  ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/


___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Missing/wrong data in release notes

2016-03-22 Thread Daniel Mustieles García
Thanks for taking care of it :)

If seen at least one new screenshot added, and another fix in the
languages, so I guess they are working on it

Cheers!

2016-03-22 17:47 GMT+01:00 Andre Klapper :

> On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 16:09 +0100, Daniel Mustieles García wrote:
> > I've noticed the 3.20 release notes have the same number of
> > contributors and changes than 3.18... I guess this is not ok ;-)
>
> That is intentional as I'm going to update those numbers later today
> (whatever timezone that is in), but thanks for the heads-up! :)
>
> > Also, there are some missing pictures (shown with a generic
> > placeholder image). Are there plans to include them? if not, they
> > should be removed.
>
> That's probably a question for Allan...
>
> andre
> --
> Andre Klapper  |  ak...@gmx.net
> http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
>
>
> ___
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
>
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Missing/wrong data in release notes

2016-03-23 Thread Allan Day
Daniel Mustieles García  wrote:
> Thanks for taking care of it :)
>
> If seen at least one new screenshot added, and another fix in the languages,
> so I guess they are working on it

We usually leave the languages and contributor statistics until the
last minute, so they are as up to date as possible.

The screenshots were badly delayed this release - sorry to everyone
about that. They are all done now.

Thanks for all your help,

Allan
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Missing/wrong data in release notes

2016-03-23 Thread Daniel Mustieles García
Thanks to you for your work!

2016-03-23 12:45 GMT+01:00 Allan Day :

> Daniel Mustieles García  wrote:
> > Thanks for taking care of it :)
> >
> > If seen at least one new screenshot added, and another fix in the
> languages,
> > so I guess they are working on it
>
> We usually leave the languages and contributor statistics until the
> last minute, so they are as up to date as possible.
>
> The screenshots were badly delayed this release - sorry to everyone
> about that. They are all done now.
>
> Thanks for all your help,
>
> Allan
>
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n