Re: String additions to 'gdk-pixbuf.master'
- Original Message - > On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:22 +0200, Piotr Drąg wrote: > > 2014-10-22 16:12 GMT+02:00 GNOME Status Pages : > > > This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: > > > http://l10n.gnome.org. > > > > > > There have been following string additions to module 'gdk-pixbuf.master': > > > > > > + "JPEG x-dpi must be a value between 1 and 65535; value '%s' is not > > > allowed." > > > + "JPEG y-dpi must be a value between 1 and 65535; value '%s' is not > > > allowed." > > > > > > > Hi Matthias, > > > > Is there a possibility that you could branch gdk-pixbuf for 2-30 and > > 2-32? It would make life a bit easier for us translators. > > I didn't commit those things, Bastien did (cc'ed) I created a branch for gdk-pixbuf-2-30 on the last commit which did not contain API additions. We haven't had a 2.32 release yet for gdk-pixbuf, which is likely going to go out with GNOME 3.16. Cheers ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String additions to 'gdk-pixbuf.master'
2014-10-22 18:00 GMT+02:00 Bastien Nocera : > I created a branch for gdk-pixbuf-2-30 on the last commit which did not > contain > API additions. We haven't had a 2.32 release yet for gdk-pixbuf, which is > likely going > to go out with GNOME 3.16. > Thanks a lot! One question though: GNOME 3.14 seems to have gdk-pixbuf-2.31.1, is this intended? Should I assign gdk-pixbuf-2-30 or master branch to G3.14 on damned-lies? Best regards, -- Piotr Drąg http://raven.fedorapeople.org/ ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String additions to 'gdk-pixbuf.master'
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:22 +0200, Piotr Drąg wrote: > 2014-10-22 16:12 GMT+02:00 GNOME Status Pages : > > This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: > > http://l10n.gnome.org. > > > > There have been following string additions to module 'gdk-pixbuf.master': > > > > + "JPEG x-dpi must be a value between 1 and 65535; value '%s' is not > > allowed." > > + "JPEG y-dpi must be a value between 1 and 65535; value '%s' is not > > allowed." > > > > Hi Matthias, > > Is there a possibility that you could branch gdk-pixbuf for 2-30 and > 2-32? It would make life a bit easier for us translators. I didn't commit those things, Bastien did (cc'ed) ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String additions to 'gdk-pixbuf.master'
2014-10-22 16:12 GMT+02:00 GNOME Status Pages : > This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: > http://l10n.gnome.org. > > There have been following string additions to module 'gdk-pixbuf.master': > > + "JPEG x-dpi must be a value between 1 and 65535; value '%s' is not allowed." > + "JPEG y-dpi must be a value between 1 and 65535; value '%s' is not > allowed." > Hi Matthias, Is there a possibility that you could branch gdk-pixbuf for 2-30 and 2-32? It would make life a bit easier for us translators. Best regards, -- Piotr Drąg http://raven.fedorapeople.org/ ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String additions to 'gdk-pixbuf.master'
Le mardi 31 janvier 2012 à 23:39 +0100, Mario Blättermann a écrit : > Am 31.01.2012 22:55, schrieb Piotr Drąg: > > 2012/1/31 Mario Blättermann > >> your last commits (Updated POTFILES.in and some other recent ones) break > >> the string freeze for GNOME 2.32 and newer. > >> > > Apart from the facts that commit updating POTFILES.in is not a culprit > > and there were some more string changes on master a few weeks back, > > there is a branch gdk-pixbuf-2-24, which is apparently used in Fedora > > 16 (GNOME 3.2), so I think stats can safely point to it. > > > > -- > > Piotr Drąg > > http://raven.fedorapeople.org/ > > > Thanks for that info. I've created an appropriate branch in the Damned > Lies pages, which points to the correct module sets. Creating the status > percentages doesn't work for the time being, but we will solve this problem. The problem is that in gdk-pixbuf-2-24 a pot file is committed in git, while it is not in master. When DL try to switch branches, it complains: "You have local changes to 'po/gdk-pixbuf.pot'; cannot switch branches" See https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2011-July/msg00068.html The issue should have been fixed by using intltool (fix B), not by committing the .pot file (fix A). Claude -- www.2xlibre.net ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String additions to 'gdk-pixbuf.master'
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 23:47 +, GNOME Status Pages wrote: > This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: > http://l10n.gnome.org. > > There have been following string additions to module 'gdk-pixbuf.master': > > + "Failed to allocate %d byte for file read buffer"/"Failed to allocate %d > bytes for file read buffer" > + "Failed to skip the next %d byte with seek()."/"Failed to skip the next > %d bytes with seek()." > + "QTIF atom size too large (%d byte)"/"QTIF atom size too large (%d > bytes)" This commit fixed the L10N bug https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629396 andre -- mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
