Seahorse status page showing the seahorse-0.8 branch
It seems that the status pages are showing the seahorse-0.8 branch, however releases are being made out of HEAD. At least on my GNU distribution, the version is 0.9.1. Could someone please clarify this, and correct the pages, if possible? -- In the GNU Project, discrimination against proprietary software is not just a policy -- it's the principle and the purpose. Proprietary software is fundamentally unjust and wrong, so when we have the opportunity to place it at a disadvantage, that is a good thing. --RMS ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Seahorse status page showing the seahorse-0.8 branch
On 7/15/06, Yavor Doganov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems that the status pages are showing the seahorse-0.8 branch, > however releases are being made out of HEAD. At least on my GNU > distribution, the version is 0.9.1. > > Could someone please clarify this, and correct the pages, if possible? This branch was discussed more than a year ago: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2005-May/msg00033.html http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2005-May/msg00035.html So, either the seahorse-0-8 branch is still what should be translated, or someone didn't do what they promised at that time. Christian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Seahorse status page showing the seahorse-0.8 branch
Op Sat, 15 Jul 2006 09:06:44 +0300 schreef Yavor Doganov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It seems that the status pages are showing the seahorse-0.8 branch, > however releases are being made out of HEAD. At least on my GNU > distribution, the version is 0.9.1. > > Could someone please clarify this, and correct the pages, if > possible? > There will be at least one more stable release from the 0.8.x branch. The 0.9.x branch is _not_ stable and is therefore not recommended for translation or day-to-day use. I would like to know what release of what distribution you are using? That distribution should probably review their package management if you're using an official release. If not (which is what I suspect is the casedebian unstable, mandriva cooker, ubuntu edgy), then we should not worry about it just yet. We will get around to translating the 0.9 branch soon enough. A stable release of 0.9.x will be released no sooner than 6 months from now. We will be switching our translation effort to HEAD in a few months, when it's time to do so. I'm sure it will be in time for a complete translation to be available by the time a stable release is made. I hope I have clarified this issue. Please understand that I _do_ appreciate your input on branches (or any other matter) and would like to hear from you when you see something you think is not okay. Maybe this incident is a sign that we might need a split in our HEAD statuspage...(which would mean maintainer hell, so probably not). Kind regards, Vincent van Adrighem ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Seahorse status page showing the seahorse-0.8 branch
Vincent van Adrighem wrote: > > I would like to know what release of what distribution you are using? Debian testing, which will become stable in December (it has 0.9 while unstable has 0.9.1, but it will propagate to testing). In case you haven't announced your plans officially you might want to contact the Debian Developer Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, since if you as upstream declare that 0.9.x is not a stable version, it shouldn't be in Etch. He might be aware of this, though. Thank you for your message. [Note: I'm not a Seahorse translator. The reason why I asked on the list is that a colleague complained why it is not translated. I noticed that the pages are showing the seahorse-0.8 branch and thought that most translators are using them anyway and that is the reason.] -- In the GNU Project, discrimination against proprietary software is not just a policy -- it's the principle and the purpose. Proprietary software is fundamentally unjust and wrong, so when we have the opportunity to place it at a disadvantage, that is a good thing. --RMS ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Fw: Re: Seahorse status page showing the seahorse-0.8 branch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vincent van Adrighem wrote: > Hi Nate, > > As one of the gnome translators, I'm wondering about the current state > of the seahorse releases. We "spoke" a year ago when you advised the > gnome translators to concentrate on the seahorse-0-8 branch of cvs. > > Last weekend, a member of the translator team was wondering why this > is still the case. He had a 0.9.x release in his distribution (didn't > say which). > > What I want to know is, will 0.8.x have more releases, or > should we concentrate on 0.9.x (i.e. HEAD in cvs) from now on? > > Please read attached e-mail for more info. Sorry, missed this earlier. Seahorse 0.9.x is still undergoing a lot of changes, and no stable releases have been made as yet. The translators may find this frustrating. I had assumed that the i18n team would prefer to work on 0.8.x, but there may be reasons that I'm unaware of to start widespread work on HEAD. Cheers, Nate -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEyjree/sRCNknZa8RAj2aAJ9wt4fjaynEnk3qPgwH2Y0mk0F8TwCfXxyG FwfIzsk3mywuvml/Sw22rn4= =O4CM -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
