Re: UI freeze exception
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Piotr Drąg wrote: > BTW your commit > https://git.gnome.org/browse/nautilus/commit/?id=2338a9239496b8204d302388649c2b45a57c38e9 > broke the string freeze. You need to ask for permission to change/add > gschema strings as well. Nop. No tarball yet, he didn't enter string freeze yet. -- Alexandre Franke ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: UI freeze exception
Thanks everyone! - Original Message - | Second i18n approval | | Cheers! | | 2015-09-02 18:00 GMT+02:00 Andre Klapper : | | > On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 15:57 -0400, Carlos Soriano Sanchez wrote: | > > Even if it is late, I would like to ask for an UI freeze exception | > > for https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725939 | > > The reason is that GtkFileChooser implemented it, but nautilus | > > didn't. One of the points for 3.18 was to make consistent | > > the behavior between GtkFileChooser and Nautilus, and this is the | > > last important item remaining. | > > | > > Basically it adds an action bar when a search is performed in some | > > remote location, indicating the user that the search is | > > being done non recursively. Here a screenshot: | > | > Makes sense so this is one r-t approval. | > | > andre | > -- | > Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net | > http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ | > | > | > ___ | > gnome-i18n mailing list | > gnome-i18n@gnome.org | > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n | > | ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: UI freeze exception
Second i18n approval Cheers! 2015-09-02 18:00 GMT+02:00 Andre Klapper : > On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 15:57 -0400, Carlos Soriano Sanchez wrote: > > Even if it is late, I would like to ask for an UI freeze exception > > for https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725939 > > The reason is that GtkFileChooser implemented it, but nautilus > > didn't. One of the points for 3.18 was to make consistent > > the behavior between GtkFileChooser and Nautilus, and this is the > > last important item remaining. > > > > Basically it adds an action bar when a search is performed in some > > remote location, indicating the user that the search is > > being done non recursively. Here a screenshot: > > Makes sense so this is one r-t approval. > > andre > -- > Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net > http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ > > > ___ > gnome-i18n mailing list > gnome-i18n@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n > ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: UI freeze exception
On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 15:57 -0400, Carlos Soriano Sanchez wrote: > Even if it is late, I would like to ask for an UI freeze exception > for https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725939 > The reason is that GtkFileChooser implemented it, but nautilus > didn't. One of the points for 3.18 was to make consistent > the behavior between GtkFileChooser and Nautilus, and this is the > last important item remaining. > > Basically it adds an action bar when a search is performed in some > remote location, indicating the user that the search is > being done non recursively. Here a screenshot: Makes sense so this is one r-t approval. andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: UI freeze exception
2015-09-02 16:05 GMT+02:00 Baurzhan Muftakhidinov : > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Piotr Drąg wrote: >> 2015-09-02 15:53 GMT+02:00 Carlos Soriano Sanchez : >>> Thanks for the response, ccing gnome-i18n as recommended. >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> | I may be biased by having implemented this in the file chooser, but I am >>> | in favor of taking this (keeping the file chooser and nautilus in sync was >>> | one of the major themes of the work in those places this cycle, after >>> all). >>> | You should cc gnome-i18n though, since this adds new strings to nautilus >>> | (even though they can be copied from GTK+ - right ?) >>> | >> >> It's early and it's an important bug fix, so here is 1/2 from i18n. >> You need just one more. :) >> >> https://wiki.gnome.org/TranslationProject/HandlingStringFreezes >> > > What package is affected? Right, it's about nautilus: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2015-September/msg00014.html Carlos, please include more information about the proposed changes next time. Listing changed/added strings is enough, and a screenshot is always nice. BTW your commit https://git.gnome.org/browse/nautilus/commit/?id=2338a9239496b8204d302388649c2b45a57c38e9 broke the string freeze. You need to ask for permission to change/add gschema strings as well. Best regards, -- Piotr Drąg http://raven.fedorapeople.org/ ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: UI freeze exception
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Piotr Drąg wrote: > 2015-09-02 15:53 GMT+02:00 Carlos Soriano Sanchez : >> Thanks for the response, ccing gnome-i18n as recommended. >> >> - Original Message - >> | I may be biased by having implemented this in the file chooser, but I am >> | in favor of taking this (keeping the file chooser and nautilus in sync was >> | one of the major themes of the work in those places this cycle, after all). >> | You should cc gnome-i18n though, since this adds new strings to nautilus >> | (even though they can be copied from GTK+ - right ?) >> | > > It's early and it's an important bug fix, so here is 1/2 from i18n. > You need just one more. :) > > https://wiki.gnome.org/TranslationProject/HandlingStringFreezes > > Best regards, > > -- > Piotr Drąg > http://raven.fedorapeople.org/ > ___ > gnome-i18n mailing list > gnome-i18n@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n What package is affected? ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: UI freeze exception
2015-09-02 15:53 GMT+02:00 Carlos Soriano Sanchez : > Thanks for the response, ccing gnome-i18n as recommended. > > - Original Message - > | I may be biased by having implemented this in the file chooser, but I am > | in favor of taking this (keeping the file chooser and nautilus in sync was > | one of the major themes of the work in those places this cycle, after all). > | You should cc gnome-i18n though, since this adds new strings to nautilus > | (even though they can be copied from GTK+ - right ?) > | It's early and it's an important bug fix, so here is 1/2 from i18n. You need just one more. :) https://wiki.gnome.org/TranslationProject/HandlingStringFreezes Best regards, -- Piotr Drąg http://raven.fedorapeople.org/ ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: UI freeze exception
Thanks for the response, ccing gnome-i18n as recommended. - Original Message - | I may be biased by having implemented this in the file chooser, but I am | in favor of taking this (keeping the file chooser and nautilus in sync was | one of the major themes of the work in those places this cycle, after all). | You should cc gnome-i18n though, since this adds new strings to nautilus | (even though they can be copied from GTK+ - right ?) | ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Boxes: UI freeze exception needed
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Frederic Peters wrote: > Hi Zeeshan, > > > One of the main things my SoC student, Adrien Plazas has been working > > on as part of his project was to add a list view to Boxes: > > > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733252 > > > > since it's a very much in demand feature, I'd like it to be included > > in 3.18. Hence this email. :) > > Screenshot is attached to the bug. > > (In French, dated March 2015, a recent screenshot would be nice.) > > > > FWIW, we tried our best to get it finished before freeze but I guess > > plans are bound to fail when it comes to deadlines. > > Let's get this in. (+1 for the release team) > > I agree, second approval for the release team. ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Boxes: UI freeze exception needed
Hi all, Apparently, I had forgotten to include release-team, which was supposed to be main target audience for this mail. :( Fixing now.. On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Frederic Peters wrote: >> Hi Zeeshan, > > Hi Frederic, > >>> One of the main things my SoC student, Adrien Plazas has been working >>> on as part of his project was to add a list view to Boxes: >>> >>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733252 >>> >>> since it's a very much in demand feature, I'd like it to be included >>> in 3.18. Hence this email. :) >>> Screenshot is attached to the bug. >> >> (In French, dated March 2015, a recent screenshot would be nice.) > > Updated! > >>> FWIW, we tried our best to get it finished before freeze but I guess >>> plans are bound to fail when it comes to deadlines. >> >> Let's get this in. (+1 for the release team) > > Thanks. > > -- > Regards, > > Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) > > Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Boxes: UI freeze exception needed
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Frederic Peters wrote: > Hi Zeeshan, Hi Frederic, >> One of the main things my SoC student, Adrien Plazas has been working >> on as part of his project was to add a list view to Boxes: >> >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733252 >> >> since it's a very much in demand feature, I'd like it to be included >> in 3.18. Hence this email. :) >> Screenshot is attached to the bug. > > (In French, dated March 2015, a recent screenshot would be nice.) Updated! >> FWIW, we tried our best to get it finished before freeze but I guess >> plans are bound to fail when it comes to deadlines. > > Let's get this in. (+1 for the release team) Thanks. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Boxes: UI freeze exception needed
Hi Zeeshan, > One of the main things my SoC student, Adrien Plazas has been working > on as part of his project was to add a list view to Boxes: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733252 > > since it's a very much in demand feature, I'd like it to be included > in 3.18. Hence this email. :) > Screenshot is attached to the bug. (In French, dated March 2015, a recent screenshot would be nice.) > FWIW, we tried our best to get it finished before freeze but I guess > plans are bound to fail when it comes to deadlines. Let's get this in. (+1 for the release team) Fred ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Boxes: UI freeze exception needed
Hi Alexandre, Thanks for quick reply! On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Alexandre Franke wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) > wrote: >> Hi, > > Hey, > >> One of the main things my SoC student, Adrien Plazas has been working >> on as part of his project was to add a list view to Boxes: >> >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733252 >> >> since it's a very much in demand feature, I'd like it to be included >> in 3.18. Hence this email. :) >> Screenshot is attached to the bug. >> >> FWIW, we tried our best to get it finished before freeze but I guess >> plans are bound to fail when it comes to deadlines. > > As far as i18n is concerned, you only need to announce string changes > currently. Does this feature introduce new strings if it gets > accepted? Yes. Diffing the pot files, I see two strings introduced: -#: ../data/ui/collection-toolbar.ui.h:4 ../data/ui/selection-toolbar.ui.h:2 +#: ../data/ui/collection-toolbar.ui.h:4 +msgid "List view" +msgstr "" + +#: ../data/ui/collection-toolbar.ui.h:5 +msgid "Grid view" +msgstr "" + FWIW, I have marked the patches that can't go without exception as commit_afterfreeze and rest as commitnow. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Boxes: UI freeze exception needed
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > Hi, Hey, > One of the main things my SoC student, Adrien Plazas has been working > on as part of his project was to add a list view to Boxes: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733252 > > since it's a very much in demand feature, I'd like it to be included > in 3.18. Hence this email. :) > Screenshot is attached to the bug. > > FWIW, we tried our best to get it finished before freeze but I guess > plans are bound to fail when it comes to deadlines. As far as i18n is concerned, you only need to announce string changes currently. Does this feature introduce new strings if it gets accepted? -- Alexandre Franke ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Boxes: UI freeze exception needed
Hi, One of the main things my SoC student, Adrien Plazas has been working on as part of his project was to add a list view to Boxes: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733252 since it's a very much in demand feature, I'd like it to be included in 3.18. Hence this email. :) Screenshot is attached to the bug. FWIW, we tried our best to get it finished before freeze but I guess plans are bound to fail when it comes to deadlines. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: UI freeze exception request: Empathy new experimental call UI
Le mercredi 31 août 2011 à 10:50 -0400, Colin Walters a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Guillaume Desmottes > wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > As you may know, the Empathy team is working on a new re-designed call > > UI: http://blog.desmottes.be/post/2011/08/26/Shiny-new-UI-in-Empathy-3.2 > > > > This UI is not used by default and need to be explicitly enabled when > > building > > Is there a reason this development isn't done in a branch? Doing so would > fix: That's an option indeed, but we usually prefer to work directly on releasable branches as it makes our life easier (as developers) and for people willing to test the new UI (it's built in Debian experimental for example). G. -- Guillaume Desmottes Jabber GPG 1024D/711E31B1 | 1B5A 1BA8 11AA F0F1 2169 E28A AC55 8671 711E 31B1 ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: UI freeze exception request: Empathy new experimental call UI
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Guillaume Desmottes wrote: > Hi everyone, > > As you may know, the Empathy team is working on a new re-designed call > UI: http://blog.desmottes.be/post/2011/08/26/Shiny-new-UI-in-Empathy-3.2 > > This UI is not used by default and need to be explicitly enabled when > building Is there a reason this development isn't done in a branch? Doing so would fix: > I'm aware that can be more of an issue for the translation team as it's > not easy to know if a string change affect the new UI or not. ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
UI freeze exception request: Empathy new experimental call UI
Hi everyone, As you may know, the Empathy team is working on a new re-designed call UI: http://blog.desmottes.be/post/2011/08/26/Shiny-new-UI-in-Empathy-3.2 This UI is not used by default and need to be explicitly enabled when building so won't (and shouldn't) be used in 3.2. Would it be possible for us to ignore UI freeze for this component? That would make our life much easier (no need to branch earlier, etc) to ensure to provide a rock solid UI for 3.4. The documentation doesn't cover the new UI yet so I guess that's fine from this pov. I'm aware that can be more of an issue for the translation team as it's not easy to know if a string change affect the new UI or not. So I'll continue sending string exception requests before merging any branch affecting translated strings. Thanks ! G. -- Guillaume Desmottes Jabber GPG 1024D/711E31B1 | 1B5A 1BA8 11AA F0F1 2169 E28A AC55 8671 711E 31B1 ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
