i18n string break request for gnome-utils
Hey, I would like to add two strings to the gnome-utils GSettings schema -- see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613926#c14 for details. Thanks. Richard. ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: i18n string break request for gnome-utils
Il giorno gio, 17/03/2011 alle 14.44 +, Richard Hughes ha scritto: Hey, I would like to add two strings to the gnome-utils GSettings schema -- see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613926#c14 for details. Thanks. Not checked with care, but you are asking for a string freeze break AND a feature addition? ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: i18n string break request for gnome-utils
On 2011-03-17 at 16:17, Luca Ferretti wrote: Il giorno gio, 17/03/2011 alle 14.44 +, Richard Hughes ha scritto: Hey, I would like to add two strings to the gnome-utils GSettings schema -- see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613926#c14 for details. Thanks. Not checked with care, but you are asking for a string freeze break AND a feature addition? the feature is not strictly user-visible; there's no UI change, and it falls back neatly to the current state if there is no color manager or no color profile available. ciao, Emmanuele. -- W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.name B: http://blogs.gnome.org/ebassi ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: i18n string break request for gnome-utils
On 17 March 2011 15:17, Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org wrote: Not checked with care, but you are asking for a string freeze break AND a feature addition? Well, I proposed it over a year ago, and the patch went back and forth a few times since then. If it's rejected, I'll just commit to master post branch, although that seems like a shame. Richard. ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: i18n string break request for gnome-utils
Hi! Well, I proposed it over a year ago, and the patch went back and forth a few times since then. If it's rejected, I'll just commit to master post branch, although that seems like a shame. Doesn't look like a big deal for me, so 1 of 2 from i18n. Regards, Johannes ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: i18n string break request for gnome-utils
Le jeudi 17 mars 2011 à 13:47 -0400, Johannes Schmid a écrit : Hi! Well, I proposed it over a year ago, and the patch went back and forth a few times since then. If it's rejected, I'll just commit to master post branch, although that seems like a shame. Doesn't look like a big deal for me, so 1 of 2 from i18n. Considering this is only gschema strings, 2 of 2 i18n approval. You've lost your last joker for this release :-P Claude ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: i18n string break request for gnome-utils
On 17 March 2011 19:24, Claude Paroz cla...@2xlibre.net wrote: Considering this is only gschema strings, 2 of 2 i18n approval. You've lost your last joker for this release :-P Thanks, committed as 55ae6efc61094cfb4e17372443336f831740fe2f Richard. ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
