Re: release notes: Mandrakesoft/Mandriva
quote who=Vincent Untz Le lundi 05 septembre 2005 à 02:35 +0200, Reinout van Schouwen a écrit : Hi, Just wanted to point out that a string in the release notes mentions Mandrakesoft. The company has been renamed to Mandriva. Please adjust the text. :) Also: GNOME 2.12 is the third 'time-based' GNOME release. 2.4 was time-based too, IIRC. So, we have 2.4, 2.6, 2.8, 2.10 and now 2.12. It should probable be fifth instead of third, shouldn't it? I gues we've been saying that for a while now. I'd like to fix both these things, but gnome-i18n must approve it, because it breaks the translations. It might not be worth it. CCed. Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: release notes: Mandrakesoft/Mandriva
Today at 9:45, Murray Cumming wrote: That sounds ideal. Please mention it in the wiki if you do this. Many thanks. Did it. So guys, please fix all typos using en.po translation, and generally, follow the guidelines from: http://live.gnome.org/ReleaseNotes_2fTranslating (Typos section). For changed meaning, also add a comment in XML file so translators get to know about it as well. Unfortunately, I only now noticed that rnwhy.xml is not included at all in the release notes—and that's where the MandrakeSoft/Mandriva and third/sixth (right? 2.2, 2.4, 2.6, 2.8, 2.10, 2.12 is sixth) problems are. Do we want to include it somewhere, or completely drop it (translators have already been translating it, so it's not a problem for them either way)? http://www.gnome.org/start/2.4/notes/rnwhy.html are the last notes that included this section as second time-based release. Cheers, Danilo ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: release notes: Mandrakesoft/Mandriva
Today at 9:45, Murray Cumming wrote: That sounds ideal. Please mention it in the wiki if you do this. Many thanks. Did it. So guys, please fix all typos using en.po translation, and generally, follow the guidelines from: http://live.gnome.org/ReleaseNotes_2fTranslating (Typos section). For changed meaning, also add a comment in XML file so translators get to know about it as well. Unfortunately, I only now noticed that rnwhy.xml is not included at all in the release notesâand that's where the MandrakeSoft/Mandriva and third/sixth (right? 2.2, 2.4, 2.6, 2.8, 2.10, 2.12 is sixth) problems are. Do we want to include it somewhere, or completely drop it (translators have already been translating it, so it's not a problem for them either way)? Best to drop it. http://www.gnome.org/start/2.4/notes/rnwhy.html are the last notes that included this section as second time-based release. Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: release notes: Mandrakesoft/Mandriva
Today at 11:47, Murray Cumming wrote: Unfortunately, I only now noticed that rnwhy.xml is not included at Best to drop it. Ok, dropped from DOC_INCLUDES at least. If you wish, you may cvs rm it as well. Cheers, Danilo ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
