Re: seahorse and seahorse-plugins branched
Le mardi 04 novembre 2008 à 13:03 -0500, Adam Schreiber a écrit : > seahorse and seahorse-plugins have been branched for 2.24. > Development will continue in TRUNK. > > Plans for seahorse include: > > Continuing x509 integration > > Plans for seahorse-plugins includes: > > Updating epiphany plugin to work with webkit and gmail > Adding signing-party and after-party (yet to be written) Thanks, l10n.gnome.org updated. Claude ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
seahorse and seahorse-plugins branched
seahorse and seahorse-plugins have been branched for 2.24. Development will continue in TRUNK. Plans for seahorse include: Continuing x509 integration Plans for seahorse-plugins includes: Updating epiphany plugin to work with webkit and gmail Adding signing-party and after-party (yet to be written) Cheers, Adam Schreiber ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: seahorse and seahorse-plugins
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 08:13:20PM +, Stef wrote: > Claude Paroz wrote: > > The misunderstanding might be about the so-called "satisfactory way". > > For me, placing a module in the same level as "branches, tags, trunk" of > > another module is *not* a satisfactory way, even if the two modules are > > related. But this should be probably a svn masters policy. > > We waited for months for the SVN dump of the repository as the first > step in doing this the 'proper' way. That is, clone the repository and > split the project from that point on, so that history is not lost. svnsync will mirror a repos. -- Regards, Olav ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: seahorse and seahorse-plugins
Claude Paroz wrote: > The misunderstanding might be about the so-called "satisfactory way". > For me, placing a module in the same level as "branches, tags, trunk" of > another module is *not* a satisfactory way, even if the two modules are > related. But this should be probably a svn masters policy. We waited for months for the SVN dump of the repository as the first step in doing this the 'proper' way. That is, clone the repository and split the project from that point on, so that history is not lost. There was no response to this request from the SVN admins for many months. So we had to eventually take matters into our own hands, and resolved it the best manner that we found satisfactory. If anyone wants to head up the effort of this move and do it in the proper way (ie: without history loss) I'll certainly support your efforts. But I'm pretty busy (outside of GNOME) for the next couple months and don't have time to get into this. Cheers, Stef Walter ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: seahorse and seahorse-plugins
Le samedi 27 septembre 2008 à 17:45 +0200, Christian Rose a écrit : > On 9/27/08, Claude Paroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le vendredi 29 août 2008 à 08:49 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit : > > > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:54:56PM +0200, Claude Paroz wrote: > > > > Le jeudi 28 août 2008 à 22:45 +0200, Daniel Nylander a écrit : > > > > > Good afternoon, > > > > > > > > > > I'm about to finish the Swedish translations for 2.24 but ran inte > > some > > > > > problems along the way. > > > > > Where is the module seahorse-plugins located? Can't find it in > > seahorse > > > > > > > > It is below seahorse trunk. > > > > However, I hope it will be moved in its own module, because it is > > really > > > > non standard currently. > > > > > > I often forget about tickets. Just email gnome-sysadmin when that > > > happens. > > > > > > Could this problem be addressed now that 2.24 rush is behind us? > > Hmm. I'm confused... > > The only Subversion request I know about for the 'seahorse' module was > RT#4499, sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] by Stef Walter > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at March 17, 2008. The topic was "Request for > SVN dump of 'seahorse' repository". > > Excerpt from the discussion in that ticket, on June 30, 2008: > > --- > > On Mon Mar 17 01:49:23 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I'd like to request an SVN dump of the 'seahorse' GNOME repository. > >> > >> This is the first step in splitting the main seahorse program, and its > >> modules into two separate projects, for easier maintenance and > > refactoring. > >> Please let me know if there's any other information you need, or if > >> there's some way for me to go about this directly. > >> > >> Thanks for everything! > >> > >> Stef Walter > >> > > Can we close this now? > > Yup. It's no longer needed and Adam Schreiber had it resolved in a > satisfactory way. > > Cheers, > > Stef > --- > > So I thought this had been resolved, and closed the ticket. Is there > some other new dump request for seahorse that [EMAIL PROTECTED] > hasn't been informed about? The misunderstanding might be about the so-called "satisfactory way". For me, placing a module in the same level as "branches, tags, trunk" of another module is *not* a satisfactory way, even if the two modules are related. But this should be probably a svn masters policy. Claude ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: seahorse and seahorse-plugins
On 9/27/08, Claude Paroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le vendredi 29 août 2008 à 08:49 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit : > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:54:56PM +0200, Claude Paroz wrote: > > > Le jeudi 28 août 2008 à 22:45 +0200, Daniel Nylander a écrit : > > > > Good afternoon, > > > > > > > > I'm about to finish the Swedish translations for 2.24 but ran inte some > > > > problems along the way. > > > > Where is the module seahorse-plugins located? Can't find it in seahorse > > > > > > It is below seahorse trunk. > > > However, I hope it will be moved in its own module, because it is really > > > non standard currently. > > > > I often forget about tickets. Just email gnome-sysadmin when that > > happens. > > > Could this problem be addressed now that 2.24 rush is behind us? Hmm. I'm confused... The only Subversion request I know about for the 'seahorse' module was RT#4499, sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] by Stef Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at March 17, 2008. The topic was "Request for SVN dump of 'seahorse' repository". Excerpt from the discussion in that ticket, on June 30, 2008: --- > On Mon Mar 17 01:49:23 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I'd like to request an SVN dump of the 'seahorse' GNOME repository. >> >> This is the first step in splitting the main seahorse program, and its >> modules into two separate projects, for easier maintenance and > refactoring. >> Please let me know if there's any other information you need, or if >> there's some way for me to go about this directly. >> >> Thanks for everything! >> >> Stef Walter >> > Can we close this now? Yup. It's no longer needed and Adam Schreiber had it resolved in a satisfactory way. Cheers, Stef --- So I thought this had been resolved, and closed the ticket. Is there some other new dump request for seahorse that [EMAIL PROTECTED] hasn't been informed about? Christian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: seahorse and seahorse-plugins
Le vendredi 29 août 2008 à 08:49 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit : > On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:54:56PM +0200, Claude Paroz wrote: > > Le jeudi 28 août 2008 à 22:45 +0200, Daniel Nylander a écrit : > > > Good afternoon, > > > > > > I'm about to finish the Swedish translations for 2.24 but ran inte some > > > problems along the way. > > > Where is the module seahorse-plugins located? Can't find it in seahorse > > > > It is below seahorse trunk. > > However, I hope it will be moved in its own module, because it is really > > non standard currently. > > I often forget about tickets. Just email gnome-sysadmin when that > happens. Could this problem be addressed now that 2.24 rush is behind us? Claude ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: seahorse and seahorse-plugins
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:54:56PM +0200, Claude Paroz wrote: > Le jeudi 28 août 2008 à 22:45 +0200, Daniel Nylander a écrit : > > Good afternoon, > > > > I'm about to finish the Swedish translations for 2.24 but ran inte some > > problems along the way. > > Where is the module seahorse-plugins located? Can't find it in seahorse > > It is below seahorse trunk. > However, I hope it will be moved in its own module, because it is really > non standard currently. I often forget about tickets. Just email gnome-sysadmin when that happens. -- Regards, Olav ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: seahorse and seahorse-plugins
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Claude Paroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le jeudi 28 août 2008 à 22:45 +0200, Daniel Nylander a écrit : >> Good afternoon, >> >> I'm about to finish the Swedish translations for 2.24 but ran inte some >> problems along the way. >> Where is the module seahorse-plugins located? Can't find it in seahorse > > It is below seahorse trunk. > However, I hope it will be moved in its own module, because it is really > non standard currently. We would love to move it to it's own module, but our long standing request for a svn dump for it has had no response and we don't wish to lose file history so here we are. Cheers, Adam ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: seahorse and seahorse-plugins
Le jeudi 28 août 2008 à 22:45 +0200, Daniel Nylander a écrit : > Good afternoon, > > I'm about to finish the Swedish translations for 2.24 but ran inte some > problems along the way. > Where is the module seahorse-plugins located? Can't find it in seahorse It is below seahorse trunk. However, I hope it will be moved in its own module, because it is really non standard currently. Claude ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
seahorse and seahorse-plugins
Good afternoon, I'm about to finish the Swedish translations for 2.24 but ran inte some problems along the way. Where is the module seahorse-plugins located? Can't find it in seahorse Regards, Daniel ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Seahorse and Seahorse-plugins Documentation Updated
The manuals found in the help/ directories of both seahorse and seahorse-plugins have been modified to more closely represent what each one contains. There shouldn't be too many new strings to translate, but there will be a few. Cheers, Adam Schreiber ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Conflict between seahorse and seahorse-plugins
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Adam Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/6/08, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Trying to package seahorse-plugins for Fedora, I discovered that >> seahorse and seahorse-plugins both you the "seahorse" domain for >> translations. Thats not going to work, since it means both seahorse >> and seahose plugins try to install >> /usr/share/locale/FOO/LC_MESSAGES/seahorse.mo. The translation domain >> for seahorse-plugins should be changed to "seahorse-plugins. >> > > Someone from Mandriva just reported the same thing in bugzilla. I'm at > an airport right now waiting for a flight to Chicago, but will take a > look at it tonight assuming I have wifi at the hotel. This has just been fixed in trunk. Cheers, Adam ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Conflict between seahorse and seahorse-plugins
Adam Schreiber wrote: > On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Claude Paroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> And if you could move it to his own module in SVN, it would be easier to >> configure and find the module. > > We'd really love to and in fact many months ago asked for the svn dump > needed to move it to its own module without losing file history. > We're still waiting. Yes we waited for about 6 months before getting any response whatsoever about the SVN dump. Just to clarify though, I was contacted in the last month or so, by someone who was cleaning up the open tickets to do with Gnome's Subversion. I believe it was Christian Rose. He asked if the problem was resolved. I said it was and that we'd given up waiting and found another solution (storing seahorse-plugins in the seahorse module). I hope that was the correct thing to say/do. Cheers, Stef Walter ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Conflict between seahorse and seahorse-plugins
Le mercredi 06 août 2008 à 16:04 -0400, Adam Schreiber a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Claude Paroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And if you could move it to his own module in SVN, it would be easier to > > configure and find the module. > > We'd really love to and in fact many months ago asked for the svn dump > needed to move it to its own module without losing file history. > We're still waiting. Do you have a bug report about this? Claude ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Conflict between seahorse and seahorse-plugins
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Claude Paroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And if you could move it to his own module in SVN, it would be easier to > configure and find the module. We'd really love to and in fact many months ago asked for the svn dump needed to move it to its own module without losing file history. We're still waiting. Cheers, Adam ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Conflict between seahorse and seahorse-plugins
Le mercredi 06 août 2008 à 15:19 +, Adam Schreiber a écrit : > On 8/6/08, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Trying to package seahorse-plugins for Fedora, I discovered that > > seahorse and seahorse-plugins both you the "seahorse" domain for > > translations. Thats not going to work, since it means both seahorse > > and seahose plugins try to install > > /usr/share/locale/FOO/LC_MESSAGES/seahorse.mo. The translation domain > > for seahorse-plugins should be changed to "seahorse-plugins. > > > > Someone from Mandriva just reported the same thing in bugzilla. I'm at > an airport right now waiting for a flight to Chicago, but will take a > look at it tonight assuming I have wifi at the hotel. And if you could move it to his own module in SVN, it would be easier to configure and find the module. Nevertheless, I added the module to Damned Lies: http://l10n.gnome.org/module/seahorse-plugins Claude ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Conflict between seahorse and seahorse-plugins
On 8/6/08, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trying to package seahorse-plugins for Fedora, I discovered that > seahorse and seahorse-plugins both you the "seahorse" domain for > translations. Thats not going to work, since it means both seahorse > and seahose plugins try to install > /usr/share/locale/FOO/LC_MESSAGES/seahorse.mo. The translation domain > for seahorse-plugins should be changed to "seahorse-plugins. > Someone from Mandriva just reported the same thing in bugzilla. I'm at an airport right now waiting for a flight to Chicago, but will take a look at it tonight assuming I have wifi at the hotel. Cheers, Adam > Thanks, Matthias > ___ > Seahorse-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/seahorse-list > ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Conflict between seahorse and seahorse-plugins
Trying to package seahorse-plugins for Fedora, I discovered that seahorse and seahorse-plugins both you the "seahorse" domain for translations. Thats not going to work, since it means both seahorse and seahose plugins try to install /usr/share/locale/FOO/LC_MESSAGES/seahorse.mo. The translation domain for seahorse-plugins should be changed to "seahorse-plugins. Thanks, Matthias ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
