Luke Shumaker: > I'm with Parabola GNU/Linux-libre, and I have doubt that we can > continue packaging the CAcert root certificate. > > It was pointed out that in 2010 Fedora Legal found[0] CAcert's "Root > Distribution License"[1] to be non-free; with a usage restriction.
How does this compare with the licenses for other certificates that are already included? In a quick search for example the licenses from Entrust seem to be less liberal than the CAcert one and yet distros seem to include them without question.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
