Re: [GNU-linux-libre] xorg-fonts (was:FreeSlack: In search of FSF certification)
Sounds good, we'll purge > font-bh-ttf-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz > font-bh-type1-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz Sneaky... On Tuesday, August 09, 2016 12:07:33 Henry Jensen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:58:01AM +0200, Henry Jensen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 01:15:51PM -0700, Ivan Zaigralin wrote: > > > I have hard time figuring out the license for these: > > > > > > font-bh-lucidatypewriter-100dpi-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz > > > font-bh-lucidatypewriter-75dpi-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz > > > > > > No-mod clause is present in these: > > > > > > font-bh-ttf-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz > > > font-bh-type1-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz > > > > You're right about font-bh-typewrityper and I removed it from the > > ConnochaetOS' repo. > > I meant font-bh-type1 ... > > > But am am not sure about font-bh-ludicatypewriter. Gentoo claims this > > fonts > > are "public domain" [0] > > > > Furthermore Trisquel (and Debian) have this fonts included as part of > > their xfonts-100dpi and xfonts-75dpi package. So I think it is okay to > > keep > > them until someone have seriously doubts. > > > > [0] > > https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/media-fonts/font-bh-lucidatypewriter > > -100dpi signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] xorg-fonts (was:FreeSlack: In search of FSF certification)
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:58:01AM +0200, Henry Jensen wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 01:15:51PM -0700, Ivan Zaigralin wrote: > > > I have hard time figuring out the license for these: > > > > font-bh-lucidatypewriter-100dpi-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz > > font-bh-lucidatypewriter-75dpi-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz > > > > No-mod clause is present in these: > > > > font-bh-ttf-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz > > font-bh-type1-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz > > > > You're right about font-bh-typewrityper and I removed it from the > ConnochaetOS' > repo. I meant font-bh-type1 ... > > But am am not sure about font-bh-ludicatypewriter. Gentoo claims this fonts > are "public domain" [0] > > Furthermore Trisquel (and Debian) have this fonts included as part of > their xfonts-100dpi and xfonts-75dpi package. So I think it is okay to keep > them until someone have seriously doubts. > > [0] > https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/media-fonts/font-bh-lucidatypewriter-100dpi
[GNU-linux-libre] xorg-fonts (was:FreeSlack: In search of FSF certification)
Hi, On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 01:15:51PM -0700, Ivan Zaigralin wrote: > I have hard time figuring out the license for these: > > font-bh-lucidatypewriter-100dpi-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz > font-bh-lucidatypewriter-75dpi-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz > > No-mod clause is present in these: > > font-bh-ttf-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz > font-bh-type1-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz You're right about font-bh-typewrityper and I removed it from the ConnochaetOS' repo. But am am not sure about font-bh-ludicatypewriter. Gentoo claims this fonts are "public domain" [0] Furthermore Trisquel (and Debian) have this fonts included as part of their xfonts-100dpi and xfonts-75dpi package. So I think it is okay to keep them until someone have seriously doubts. [0] https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/media-fonts/font-bh-lucidatypewriter-100dpi Regards, Henry
