Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [gnu.org #1291285] RE: FSF endorsement request for Hyperbola GNU/Linux-libre
Jason Self wrote .. > Yes, exactly. I'll volunteer to do that. https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Incoming_distros has been updated to show Hyperbola in review.
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [gnu.org #1291285] RE: FSF endorsement request for Hyperbola GNU/Linux-libre
> > only in this case he was interjecting immediately, vouching that in
> > this case, the distro is already know to be a valid candidate and
needs
> > no further scrutiny at this level
>
> So now, Hyperbola needs wait for an individual volunteer on the list who
> wants to take on the role of ensuring that this application continues to
> move forward ("application manager"), right?
Yes, exactly.
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [gnu.org #1291285] RE: FSF endorsement request for Hyperbola GNU/Linux-libre
On 04/29/2018 02:09 AM, Jason Self via RT wrote:
> The GNU Webmasters just do a very basic check to make sure that a distro is a
> feasible candidate. The folks on the mailing list take it from there. So our
> role is done. If you've already contacted the mailing list that's fine.
On 04/29/2018 07:02 AM, bill-auger wrote:
> i think jason was indicating, as might normally be done in the future,
> that someone else representing GNU would gather that information and
> post it to gnu-linux-libre@nongnu.org on behalf of the new distro to
> begin the community evaluation phase -
>
> only in this case he was interjecting immediately, vouching that in
> this case, the distro is already know to be a valid candidate and needs
> no further scrutiny at this level
So now, Hyperbola needs wait for an individual volunteer on the list who
wants to take on the role of ensuring that this application continues to
move forward ("application manager"), right?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [gnu.org #1291285] RE: FSF endorsement request for Hyperbola GNU/Linux-libre
On 04/29/2018 02:09 AM, Jason Self via RT wrote:
> The GNU Webmasters just do a very basic check to make sure that a distro is a
> feasible candidate. The folks on the mailing list take it from there. So our
> role is done. If you've already contacted the mailing list that's fine.
On 04/29/2018 07:02 AM, bill-auger wrote:
> i think jason was indicating, as might normally be done in the future,
> that someone else representing GNU would gather that information and
> post it to gnu-linux-libre@nongnu.org on behalf of the new distro to
> begin the community evaluation phase -
>
> only in this case he was interjecting immediately, vouching that in
> this case, the distro is already know to be a valid candidate and needs
> no further scrutiny at this level
So now, Hyperbola needs wait for an individual volunteer on the list who
wants to take on the role of ensuring that this application continues to
move forward ("application manager"), right?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [gnu.org #1291285] RE: FSF endorsement request for Hyperbola GNU/Linux-libre
On 04/28/2018 02:18 PM, Jason Self via RT wrote: > Hyperbola seems a feasible candidate. Please request an endorsement > from the dedicated mailing list . They > should include a description of their new distro, a link to their > home page, and any other useful info. > > They will take over from there. i think jason was indicating, as might normally be done in the future, that someone else representing GNU would gather that information and post it to gnu-linux-libre@nongnu.org on behalf of the new distro to begin the community evaluation phase - only in this case he was interjecting immediately, vouching that in this case, the distro is already know to be a valid candidate and needs no further scrutiny at this level signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
