Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Amendment proposal for incoming distros page

[André Silva]

On 05/04/2018 01:50 AM, Jason Self wrote:
> In thinking on this, since I do this in my spare time and don't seem
> to work fast enough for André so as to get an entire distro reviewed
> in 4 days before it's called "stalled", I hereby resign as the
> Hyperbola application manager. Someone else can do it.
> 

I think you are misunderstanding me, perhaps my english is not enough
good to explain the goal in this thread (portuguese is my native one),
so i apologize if i've offend you, this wasn't my intention since i have
a good friendship with you through different free software projects
channels in freenode.

I've put "Seems Hyperbola endorsement process (to be evaluated by
community) is stalled for now." by referring about mailing lists
activity through all users subscribed here, not you as application manager.

That thing gave me an idea about "What happens if X distro is stalled
(without activity for evaluation) through mailing lists for X distro for
a long time?" it means months, years, X time, etc.

So, i've opened this thread to propose an amendment for those cases, eg.

If there isn't activity in the mailing lists for evaluation to certain X
distro for 4 years, then it could be assigned to reviewer manager to see
if it follows FSDG and moved back to evaluation to community continue it.

It's just an idea/proposal that came to my mind to know that could
happen in those cases for certain distros that are under evaluation, it
isn't a specific thread for Hyperbola or a personal attack for you or
another user(s).



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Amendment proposal for incoming distros page

[André Silva]

On 05/04/2018 01:38 AM, Jason Self wrote:
> This is something I do in my spare time. The usual review will take
> weeks. Sometimes months. (Remember the FSF said that PureOS took
> something like two years.) This is not some automated rote process. It
> takes a lot of thankless hard work and thought

Jason, i'm not attacking you, i think you are misunderstanding me and I
understand that it takes time, i just proposed a new amendment to
contribute in the "Incoming distros" page.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Amendment proposal for incoming distros page

[André Silva]

On 05/04/2018 01:34 AM, Jason Self wrote:
> I only volunteered to look over Hyperbola 4 days ago. It seems
> premature to say this. Plus, I hope others are willing to help too and
> not leaving it to a one-person job.
> 

I think you misunderstood, i have put **It's so early to be officially
considered as stalled**. Otherwise the goal in this thread is about an
amendment proposal for if there is a stalled process for **a long time**
for X distro, it means months, years, ever forever, adding a supposition
for X time.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Amendment proposal for incoming distros page

[Jason Self]

In thinking on this, since I do this in my spare time and don't seem
to work fast enough for André so as to get an entire distro reviewed
in 4 days before it's called "stalled", I hereby resign as the
Hyperbola application manager. Someone else can do it.

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Amendment proposal for incoming distros page

[Jason Self]

This is something I do in my spare time. The usual review will take
weeks. Sometimes months. (Remember the FSF said that PureOS took
something like two years.) This is not some automated rote process. It
takes a lot of thankless hard work and thought.

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Amendment proposal for incoming distros page

[Jason Self]

André Silva  wrote ..
> Seems Hyperbola endorsement process (to be evaluated by community)
> is stalled for now.

I only volunteered to look over Hyperbola 4 days ago. It seems
premature to say this. Plus, I hope others are willing to help too and
not leaving it to a one-person job.

[GNU-linux-libre] Amendment proposal for incoming distros page

[André Silva]

Seems Hyperbola endorsement process (to be evaluated by community) is
stalled for now.

It's so early to be officially considered as stalled, however the first
thing that came to my mind was in which if it persists for a long time
(months, years, etc), there isn't an amendment for those cases. What is
the next step that should we do for it? Shouldn't we create an amendment
that is needed find a review manager to handle it (eg. the same
application manager)?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[GNU-linux-libre] advice

[Hebert Bastidas]

Greetings:
I am a teacher, in blue xo1.5 laptop
you can install LibreCAD
Thank you


xo1.5
Description: Binary data