Re: [GNU-linux-libre] programs which only use-case is non-free Was: Adding some scummvm

2023-04-25 Thread Jason Self
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 23:36:34 -0400
bill-auger  wrote:

> this is one of those FSDG grey-areas, for which it would be good to
> have some consensus

It sounds like what you're talking about his how to handle
distro-specific packaging decisions. It's important to note that the 
FSDG doesn't seem to prevent distro maintainers from adopting an even
broader interpretation of "steering users to nonfree software" than
what the FSDG might require, nor does it seem to require distro 
maintainers to include any software that they don't wish to, for
whatever reason they don't wish to, even if it would be permissible
under the FSDG, so they'll still be able to exclude such software
regardless.


pgprurHBMuXRA.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [GNU-linux-libre] programs which only use-case is non-free Was: Adding some scummvm

2023-04-25 Thread bill-auger
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 21:58:54 -0400 bill-auger wrote:
> without those, distros would likely stop distributing the
> game engine also; so its a "package deal" really

i would like to expand on this point - it has broader implications for the FSDG,
and is a recurring topic of discussion

some have suggested that it conflicts with the "steering toward" guideline,
for an FSDG distro to distribute a program, which only known use-case (other
than hack to it out) is to install or wrap some other non-free program
(flash-player-installer is exemplary) - this is generally considered to be
"steering toward" use of some other non-free program, prohibited per the FSDG

WRT scummvm, there o/c remains the use-case of writing a new game for it; but
that is equivalent, in all aspects but the work-load, to hacking-out specific
bits of some code-base, in order to make it fit the FSDG (eg: someone could
hack flash-player-installer to point at a libre file)

both are possible and common; but neither would fully excuse the "steering
toward" guideline, until indeed some libre replacement exists, for the distro to
"deflect toward" - ie: without the deflection of intention, to distribute
scummvm, is to "steer toward" playing non-free games

this is one of those FSDG grey-areas, for which it would be good to have some
consensus



Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Adding some scummvm game(s) to the "List of software that does not respect the Free System Distribution Guidelines".

2023-04-25 Thread bill-auger
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 21:32:07 -0400 Richard wrote:

> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> 
>   > > Is it clear yet whether scummvm itself is unacceptable
>   > > in and of itself?  
> 
>   > that was my assumption - many years ago, debian reviewed and approved the 
> game
>   > machine and all of the mentioned games  
> 
> I am confused here.  What, exactly, "was your assumption"?
> 
> From the info you provided, it looks like scummvm IS free.
> Do you agree with that?

yes, that the game engine is libre; but the games mentioned in the OP all have
the "no-selling" license

just to note that those four games are the only known to exist which are not
totally proprietary - without those, distros would likely stop distributing the
game engine also; so its a "package deal" really



Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Adding some scummvm game(s) to the "List of software that does not respect the Free System Distribution Guidelines".

2023-04-25 Thread Richard Stallman
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > > Is it clear yet whether scummvm itself is unacceptable
  > > in and of itself?

  > that was my assumption - many years ago, debian reviewed and approved the 
game
  > machine and all of the mentioned games

I am confused here.  What, exactly, "was your assumption"?

>From the info you provided, it looks like scummvm IS free.
Do you agree with that?

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)