Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [gnu.org #1262331] (inactive Linux distributions)

2018-01-25 Thread Andrew Nesbit 
On 25/01/2018 11:38, Jean Louis wrote:

> Good starting point with references is here:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subdomain
> 
> In general, if the owner of the website does not
> give you link with "www" such shall not be used
> and referred, especially if other link is simply
> working.

My message wasn't clear.  I was'nt referring to "www." or subdomains.  I
was referring to trailing slashes in URL's.

Andrew

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [gnu.org #1262331] (inactive Linux distributions)

2018-01-25 Thread Andrew Nesbit 
On 25/01/2018 02:38, bill-auger wrote:

> in the case of the 'www.' sub-domain in 'http://www.foo.com', that 
> clearly identifies the HTTP "World Wide Web" server of foo.com
As a somewhat relevant side issue, what are the rules or conventions
regarding URLs with unadorned directory or file components, like
"http://www.foo.com";?

After reading up the other day, my understanding is that since a
trailing slash indicates something like a directory resource depending
on context, "http://www.foo.com"; should canonically be represented as
"http://www.foo.com/";.  The web server will resolve this "directory" to
"http://www.foo.com/index.html"; or something similar.  Do I understand
correctly?

What are the history and rules regarding this?  Is there an RFC or some
other authoritative resource that explains it?

Andrew

-- 
OpenPGP key: EB28 0338 28B7 19DA DAB0 B193 D21D 996E 883B E5B9
-- 
OpenPGP key: EB28 0338 28B7 19DA DAB0 B193 D21D 996E 883B E5B9