【面内君が送る独り言vol.23 】
最近ちょっと思うことがある。 異性からの返信が早い、返信が多いから「良いサイト」なのか？ http://www.look8.org/ ここ見てもらえばわかると思うけど、女性からバシバシメール来るのに「会えない」っていうのは普通に考えて「おかしい」よね？ 「面白おかしく異性とメールをするだけ」という趣旨ならともかく、男性であれば よさげな子がいれば「会いたい」と思うからこそ出会い系サイトをやっているはずだ（奇麗事抜きで） 会員がすごいいるサイトならメールがバシバシきてもおかしくないが、相手が素人ならそれなりの確率で必ず「会えるはず」だ。 それが一般的なのに、なぜか逢う約束の話になると、必ずと言っていいほど話がそれる。そのクセおしゃべりは大好き。それがサクラでしょ？と思う今日この頃です。ですので僕的には女性からの返事は夜中は当然来なかったり、逢う約束したら平気で断ってその後メールが来なくなったりが【本当の出会い系】だと思う今日この頃です。だって相手は素人女性なんですから。まぁ確かに出会い系だと女性はかなり積極的になったりするんですけど。 でも素人女性としても「ただ男と会いたい」「そういう関係になりたい」という理由だけでは、入会しづらいのが正直なところだと思う。 女性に入会する「理由」を与えてあげて、「あとは気があったらどうぞ」的な運営であれば、女性も気軽に入会できるし、男性としても素人女性とメールをやる、もしくは会う確率は断然に上がると思います。 そこで、「本当の出会いサイト」を目指すこと2年。そういうサイトのみを激選したつもりです。 まぁ現段階で満足している人にとっては無用の長物になってしまいますけど。 女性は入るといいものがもらえます（確認してね） 変な広告や同時登録、後課金、不当請求などはありません!(^^)! ★完全無料 ★電話番号認証もなし！ ★基本、メアド非公開 ★なかよくなったら勝手にメール交換してね！ ★でもどりＯＫ！いつでも退会可能！ ★写メの登録ももちろんＯＫなので逢う前から安心。 サーバーの要領の問題もあるので一定数の会員さんが集まったら、新規入会受付は終了の方向らしいです。 最後にこれは僕にとっても諸刃の剣です。 だって男性会員が増えれば同時にライバルも増えるワケです。 でも男性会員が増えなければ当然女性会員も増えません。 と、いうワケで僕が主に利用しているサイトを何個か上げてみました。 主に女性会員の登録を期待しています（笑） http://www.look8.org/ -- 会員様向け配信です。 ご不要な方はそのまま返信してください。 ※当サイトに掲載されておりますサイトは当サイトとは関係ございませんので 質問・ご不明な点は各サイトのインフォメーションにお問合せください。 ___ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Re: My Linux is not your Linux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Kastrup wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> >> > My Linux is not your Linux. It is the human Linux >> > that acknowledges that Linux involves human work >> > to create, that although it is free you are not >> > entitled to it, that although it is created in large part >> > by volunteers, they deserve to be paid for their >> > gifts with at least gratitude. >> >> You can start by calling your complete system GNU/Linux. That would >> show respect towards the project responsible for fundamental >> components such as compiler, central libraries and text and file >> utilities. > > But not for the editor (vim, not emacs :) and xorg. The name would > be too long then :-) If you find the "GNU" unappealing, you can of course choose to exorcise it the hard way, like the maintainer of http://www.skarnet.org/poweredby.html> tries. If you use the utilities from BSD, you should get close. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum ___ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Re: Placing GPL licensed application's installer inaproperietaryapplication's installer
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Wahaj Khan wrote: >> >> Yes item 2 in my email must be prohibited as its not mere >> aggregation, its more of merging. > > That's a distinction without a difference. It is mere/bare/scant > aggregation. Well, I'd recommend the use of Google Groups on threads in this group with Mr. Terekhov's participation before deciding to follow any legal advice of his. Since his razorsharp legal opinions are unfortunately not shared by the copyright holders (for example, the FSF), following his advice is not prone to keep you out of the courts. And since the judges are seemingly not sufficiently versed in the laws for following Mr. Terekhov's reasoning, following his advice is not likely to get you out of the courts unscathed again. It would certainly be appreciated by the FSF if the law cut down the extent and reach of copyright to the measure that Mr. Terekhov imagines for the GPL. However, while copyright law is given the current, partly ridiculous extent, GPLed works are just as protected as other works are. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum ___ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Re: My Linux is not your Linux
2005-06-21
Thread
* * * Y o u r . S h e p h e r d . A q u i l a . D e u s . ( d 2 0 0 5 x x , d 2 0 0 4 x x , d 2 0 0 3 x x , d 2 0 0 2 x x ) * * *
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In the land of no software patents. Isn't it easier to remove the law or the government who protects them? ___ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Re: My Linux is not your Linux
2005-06-21
Thread
* * * Y o u r . S h e p h e r d . A q u i l a . D e u s . ( d 2 0 0 5 x x , d 2 0 0 4 x x , d 2 0 0 3 x x , d 2 0 0 2 x x ) * * *
David Kastrup wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > To the denizens of comp.os.linux.advocacy! > > You crossposted to gnu.misc.discuss. > > > My Linux is not your Linux. It is the human Linux > > that acknowledges that Linux involves human work > > to create, that although it is free you are not > > entitled to it, that although it is created in large part > > by volunteers, they deserve to be paid for their > > gifts with at least gratitude. > > You can start by calling your complete system GNU/Linux. That would > show respect towards the project responsible for fundamental > components such as compiler, central libraries and text and file > utilities. But not for the editor (vim, not emacs :) and xorg. The name would be too long then :-) ___ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Re: Placing GPL licensed application's installer inaproperietaryapplication's installer
Wahaj Khan wrote: > > Yes item 2 in my email must be prohibited as its not mere aggregation, > its more of merging. That's a distinction without a difference. It is mere/bare/scant aggregation. regards, alexander. ___ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Re: Placing GPL licensed application's installer in aproperietaryapplication's installer
Yes item 2 in my email must be prohibited as its not mere aggregation, its more of merging. Regards, Wahaj Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> Wahaj Khan wrote: ...>> One and two are the same. Mere aggregation. It is nonsensical to talk about "aggregation" if one "aggregate" isnot even accessible for separate use.-- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum___Gnu-misc-discuss mailing listGnu-misc-discuss@gnu.orghttp://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss ___ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Re: Placing GPL licensed application's installer in a properietaryapplication's installer
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Wahaj Khan wrote: ... > > One and two are the same. Mere aggregation. It is nonsensical to talk about "aggregation" if one "aggregate" is not even accessible for separate use. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum ___ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Re: My Linux is not your Linux
In the land of no software patents. ___ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Re: Placing GPL licensed application's installer in a properietaryapplication's installer
Wahaj Khan wrote: ... One and two are the same. Mere aggregation. regards, alexander. ___ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Distributed Search Engine
Hi Everyone. I am writing this post, to ask if there is any Project, dedicated to develop a GNU distributed web-search engine that could be used (in the long term) as a substitute for google-yahoo etc? Do you have any informations on this subject? MTIA Grigoris ___ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Placing GPL licensed application's installer in a properietary application's installer
Hi, I am slightly confused regarding how one can provide GPL based software along with properietary based software both in either a zip,rar file placed on a CD or simply placed on a CD. There are 3 ways 1) By placing the GPL software along with the properietary software side by side on a CD and on installation of the properietary application's setup, the GPL software installer is launched as well which completes the installation (no linking of any sort is performed here, only GPL application is launched using shellexecute etc. The GPL setup.exe can be seen or launched on its own). 2) By bundling the GPL software with the properietary application setup program (Bundling means actually making the setup.exe of the GPL software embedded in the properietary's application setup program. The GPL setup.exe can't be seen or launched on its own) 3) By downloading the GPL software at run time from internet and then installing it by the properietary application setup program by copying it on hard disk and then launching By reading the FAQ provided at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLCommercially and by reading the question What is the difference between "mere aggregation" and "combining two modules into one program"? it seems that 1 and 3 are valid means of providing GPL software with properietary software. Am I right ? Regards, Wahaj ___ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
