Re: Is it a goal of the Free software movement to destroy easy sources of income?

2008-01-17 Thread Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 03:05:04PM -0800, mike3 wrote:
 QUOTE:
 Stallman does not care about
 business.  But others do.  Open Source has been one way to sell
 corporations their own downfall in a veiled manner.  It has taken a
 brutal but effective toll on stock market and the corporations.  Free
 Software is nothing that you can easily profit from.  But it is
 something that will prevail. 
 
 Does this mean that one of the goals of Free software is to destroy
 software as a source of money, hence requiring people to resort to
 other forms of business to obtain money that might be much more
 difficult to start up? (hence limiting them to only people _born_ into
 wealth?!)
 
 Or am I just too paranoid or way off base in my interpretations here?

Both. Firstly he doesn't speak for the FSF or Stallman, secondly,
Stallman has been found to say charge as much as you can for Free
Software services (this is not a direct quote, but the meaning is
there).

What Stallman advocates is to do business whilst respecting your
customers by not restricting their freedom.

There some extremist views of capitalism which defend that you should
extort as much money as you can, by any means deemed necessary, from
your clients. This includes restrincting user's freedom, false
advertisement, FUD, etc...

Stallman recommends you not to do dis but instead respect your
customers: give them their full rights. Attract your customers with
honey, rather than binding them in chains.

This seems to me like a very sound and honest business method, and
nothing at all like something against business.

Rui

-- 
Hail Eris!
Today is Boomtime, the 17th day of Chaos in the YOLD 3174
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?


___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss


Re: Is it a goal of the Free software movement to destroy easy sources of income?

2008-01-17 Thread mike3
On Jan 17, 2:37 am, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
 Both. Firstly he doesn't speak for the FSF or Stallman, secondly,
 Stallman has been found to say charge as much as you can for Free
 Software services (this is not a direct quote, but the meaning is
 there).

 What Stallman advocates is to do business whilst respecting your
 customers by not restricting their freedom.


Ah.

 There some extremist views of capitalism which defend that you should
 extort as much money as you can, by any means deemed necessary, from
 your clients. This includes restrincting user's freedom, false
 advertisement, FUD, etc...


So then it's not to destroy business, period, but to destroy
*immoral* business. That makes a lot more sense, actually.

 Stallman recommends you not to do dis but instead respect your
 customers: give them their full rights. Attract your customers with
 honey, rather than binding them in chains.

 This seems to me like a very sound and honest business method, and
 nothing at all like something against business.


It sure does.
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss


Re: Is it a goal of the Free software movement to destroy easy sources of income?

2008-01-16 Thread David Kastrup
mike3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I noticed this old post here:

 http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.misc.discuss/msg/243e191086e80bef?dmode=source

 QUOTE:
 Stallman does not care about
 business.  But others do.  Open Source has been one way to sell
 corporations their own downfall in a veiled manner.  It has taken a
 brutal but effective toll on stock market and the corporations.  Free
 Software is nothing that you can easily profit from.  But it is
 something that will prevail. 

 Does this mean that one of the goals of Free software is to destroy
 software as a source of money, hence requiring people to resort to
 other forms of business to obtain money that might be much more
 difficult to start up? (hence limiting them to only people _born_ into
 wealth?!)

 Or am I just too paranoid or way off base in my interpretations here?

I am nobody's speaker or leader, so there is nothing to be gained from
assigning an interpretation to my words.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss


Re: Is it a goal of the Free software movement to destroy easy sources of income?

2008-01-16 Thread mike3
On Jan 16, 4:12 pm, David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 mike3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  I noticed this old post here:

 http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.misc.discuss/msg/243e191086e80bef?...

  QUOTE:
  Stallman does not care about
  business.  But others do.  Open Source has been one way to sell
  corporations their own downfall in a veiled manner.  It has taken a
  brutal but effective toll on stock market and the corporations.  Free
  Software is nothing that you can easily profit from.  But it is
  something that will prevail. 

  Does this mean that one of the goals of Free software is to destroy
  software as a source of money, hence requiring people to resort to
  other forms of business to obtain money that might be much more
  difficult to start up? (hence limiting them to only people _born_ into
  wealth?!)

  Or am I just too paranoid or way off base in my interpretations here?

 I am nobody's speaker or leader, so there is nothing to be gained from
 assigning an interpretation to my words.


Well, okay, I'm not sure exactly what that's supposed to mean
(What I'm trying to gain right now with my post is understanding
of this, first of all), but perhaps maybe you could tell me if my
interpretation was right?
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss


Re: Is it a goal of the Free software movement to destroy easy sources of income?

2008-01-16 Thread David Kastrup
mike3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On Jan 16, 4:12 pm, David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 mike3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  I noticed this old post here:

 http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.misc.discuss/msg/243e191086e80bef?...

  QUOTE:
  Stallman does not care about
  business.  But others do.  Open Source has been one way to sell
  corporations their own downfall in a veiled manner.  It has taken a
  brutal but effective toll on stock market and the corporations.  Free
  Software is nothing that you can easily profit from.  But it is
  something that will prevail. 

  Does this mean that one of the goals of Free software is to destroy
  software as a source of money, hence requiring people to resort to
  other forms of business to obtain money that might be much more
  difficult to start up? (hence limiting them to only people _born_ into
  wealth?!)

  Or am I just too paranoid or way off base in my interpretations here?

 I am nobody's speaker or leader, so there is nothing to be gained from
 assigning an interpretation to my words.

 Well, okay, I'm not sure exactly what that's supposed to mean (What
 I'm trying to gain right now with my post is understanding of this,
 first of all), but perhaps maybe you could tell me if my
 interpretation was right?

Again: I don't set the goals for free software, so it is nonsensical to
assign any relevance to any interpretation of my musings.  They are food
for thought, nothing else.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss


Re: Is it a goal of the Free software movement to destroy easy sources of income?

2008-01-16 Thread mike3
On Jan 16, 4:37 pm, David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 mike3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  On Jan 16, 4:12 pm, David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  mike3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   I noticed this old post here:

  http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.misc.discuss/msg/243e191086e80bef?...

   QUOTE:
   Stallman does not care about
   business.  But others do.  Open Source has been one way to sell
   corporations their own downfall in a veiled manner.  It has taken a
   brutal but effective toll on stock market and the corporations.  Free
   Software is nothing that you can easily profit from.  But it is
   something that will prevail. 

   Does this mean that one of the goals of Free software is to destroy
   software as a source of money, hence requiring people to resort to
   other forms of business to obtain money that might be much more
   difficult to start up? (hence limiting them to only people _born_ into
   wealth?!)

   Or am I just too paranoid or way off base in my interpretations here?

  I am nobody's speaker or leader, so there is nothing to be gained from
  assigning an interpretation to my words.

  Well, okay, I'm not sure exactly what that's supposed to mean (What
  I'm trying to gain right now with my post is understanding of this,
  first of all), but perhaps maybe you could tell me if my
  interpretation was right?

 Again: I don't set the goals for free software, so it is nonsensical to
 assign any relevance to any interpretation of my musings.  They are food
 for thought, nothing else.


I didn't say you did set or assign goals, I was trying to better
understand your opinion on what you _think_ the goal seems
to be or should be or something. I just want to know what you
meant when you said what you said. I just wanted understanding
 knowledge to satisfy my curiosity.

Can you please tell me?
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss


Re: Is it a goal of the Free software movement to destroy easy sources of income?

2008-01-16 Thread David Kastrup
mike3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On Jan 16, 4:37 pm, David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Again: I don't set the goals for free software, so it is nonsensical
 to assign any relevance to any interpretation of my musings.  They
 are food for thought, nothing else.


 I didn't say you did set or assign goals, I was trying to better
 understand your opinion on what you _think_ the goal seems to be or
 should be or something.

I was describing effects, not goals.

 I just want to know what you meant when you said what you said. I just
 wanted understanding  knowledge to satisfy my curiosity.

 Can you please tell me?

I don't consider myself an appropriate subject for study.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss


Re: Is it a goal of the Free software movement to destroy easy sources of income?

2008-01-16 Thread mike3
On Jan 16, 5:03 pm, David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 mike3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  On Jan 16, 4:37 pm, David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Again: I don't set the goals for free software, so it is nonsensical
  to assign any relevance to any interpretation of my musings.  They
  are food for thought, nothing else.

  I didn't say you did set or assign goals, I was trying to better
  understand your opinion on what you _think_ the goal seems to be or
  should be or something.

 I was describing effects, not goals.


Oh, so the _effect_ is to destroy easy sources of income, then,
right?

  I just want to know what you meant when you said what you said. I just
  wanted understanding  knowledge to satisfy my curiosity.

  Can you please tell me?

 I don't consider myself an appropriate subject for study.


Study? What do you mean? I just wanted to understand you
right.
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss