guile-2.0
Hello, as reported in one of my earlier mails I have build a working gnucash (opensuse 12.1, guile 2). but starting a report is still impossible. Today I tried it again in the console and got this message: ERROR: In procedure hash-fold: Wrong type argument in position 3 (expecting hash-table): #(((bgcolor . #f6ffdb))) this seemed to be in file html-document.scm line 292 actually I do not now if this is indeed an error in this file or one of the new guile-2 things. ??? RBB ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Re: guile-2.0
Op vrijdag 3 februari 2012 13:15:32 schreef rbibr...@t-online.de: Hello, as reported in one of my earlier mails I have build a working gnucash (opensuse 12.1, guile 2). but starting a report is still impossible. Today I tried it again in the console and got this message: ERROR: In procedure hash-fold: Wrong type argument in position 3 (expecting hash-table): #(((bgcolor . #f6ffdb))) this seemed to be in file html-document.scm line 292 actually I do not now if this is indeed an error in this file or one of the new guile-2 things. ??? This is also where I stranded so far on Fedora 16, with test packages for Guile 2.0 installed. My guile knowledge is too limited to understand this well. The gnucash code has a definition for the hash-table procedure. But this should only be triggered for guile 1.8 and older. Guile 2.0 has its own definition of hash-table. Perhaps these definitions are not compatible ? I mean, the gnucash guile code was written for guile 1.6 and 1.8. So perhaps GnuCash interprets hash-table differently in terms of 1.8 while the 2.0 definition may be slightly different ? From what I could read in the guile 2.0 manual it doesn't seem like that. Geert ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Re: No vendor/customer address on printable invoice in trunk
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 22:48:29 + Mike Evans mi...@saxicola.idps.co.uk wrote: On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:39:14 -0500 Bob Brush gnuc...@wvit.net wrote: On 02/01/2012 12:02 PM, Mike Evans wrote: In SVN trunk, I've just noticed that the printable invoice (invoice.scm) doesn't have the customer's details, same with bills. Not sure when this first occurred as I've not printed an invoice for a while. :( Tax invoice works fine. Mike Evans ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel I saw this behaviour happen once before, I had sent a request to investigate on Dec 11, but by Dec 12 it was fixed, so I didn't worry about it any more. I was kind of waiting to see what would happen. Thanks for that Bob. That may help to narrow down the error. I didn't see any mention in the mailing lists however. Mike E ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel Committed fix in r21930. Mike ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Re: r21930 - gnucash/trunk/src/report/business-reports - Restore missing customer|vendor in printable invoice.
Op vrijdag 3 februari 2012 08:16:23 schreef Mike Evans: Author: mikee Date: 2012-02-03 08:16:23 -0500 (Fri, 03 Feb 2012) New Revision: 21930 Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/21930 Modified: gnucash/trunk/src/report/business-reports/invoice.scm Log: Restore missing customer|vendor in printable invoice. Modified: gnucash/trunk/src/report/business-reports/invoice.scm === --- gnucash/trunk/src/report/business-reports/invoice.scm 2012-02-03 11:13:53 UTC (rev 21929) +++ gnucash/trunk/src/report/business-reports/invoice.scm 2012-02-03 13:16:23 UTC (rev 21930) @@ -668,6 +668,7 @@ (if (not (null? invoice)) (begin + (set! owner (gncInvoiceGetOwner invoice)) (let ((type (gncInvoiceGetType invoice))) (cond ((eqv? type GNC-INVOICE-CUST-INVOICE) Ah, that line seems to have gone lost in my commit 21575. Thanks for spotting it. I have additionally committed a fix for the easy invoice, which I broke similarly in r21551. Geert ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Re: guile-2.0
-Original Message- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:36:58 +0100 Subject: Re: guile-2.0 From: Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be This is also where I stranded so far on Fedora 16, with test packages for Guile 2.0 installed. My guile knowledge is too limited to understand this well. The gnucash code has a definition for the hash-table procedure. But this should only be triggered for guile 1.8 and older. Guile 2.0 has its own definition of hash-table. Perhaps these definitions are not compatible ? I mean, the gnucash guile code was written for guile 1.6 and 1.8. So perhaps GnuCash interprets hash-table differently in terms of 1.8 while the 2.0 definition may be slightly different ? From what I could read in the guile 2.0 manual it doesn't seem like that. Geert according to the manual guile provides two types of hashtables one abstract type and one vectorlike type. May be that mixing both types was allowed in guile 1.8 but not longer in 2.0 In file html-style-info.scm a vector type table was created. The lines for the abstract type are outcommented. May be that the hanging hash-fold should be replaced by a construction similare to kvt-fold.??? Rudolf ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Invoice printing, table formatting.
Hi all In an effort to improve the look of the printable invoice I've changed some of the table setting in invoice.scm near line 707 to: (gnc:html-table-set-style! table table 'attribute (list border 1) 'attribute (list cellspacing 0) 'attribute (list STYLE=\border-collapse: collapse;\) 'attribute (list cellpadding 2)) which, on screen, removes the double line table border. It's the border-collapse bit that's important here. However, on printing to actual paper I still don't get nice thin hard line cell borders. My question is why and where during the printing process does the formatting get altered? Exporting to html and subsequent printing from a browser retains the correct formatting. Mike E ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
commit #21848 for htdocs: Fix facebook like button
I've noticed that the commit #21848[1] commit broke the validation of the gnucash website. I don't really know what it does but I remember I've used that code because it was adviced (browsing the internet) to do so for validation purpose. While working with the website I've always aimed to have it validated (XHTML+RDFa as of now) but I don't really know if it is of any use. Regards Cristian [1] http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset?reponame=new=21848%40htdocs%2Ftrunkold=21769%40htdocs%2Ftrunk ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
