Re: [GNC-dev] Ubuntu. Both guile-2.0 and guile-2.2 installed, can't find guile-2.2

[Geert Janssens]

Op vrijdag 11 mei 2018 15:29:34 CEST schreef Christopher Lam:
> As per subject.
> 
> Having successfully worked on guile-2.0, I wished to try 2.2 and 'sudo
> apt install guile-2.2' and all was well. I can run guile-2.2.
> 
> However cmake rebuild script cannot find guile-2.2 and tries to
> configure with guile-2.0 instead.
> 
> However the test suite runs using guile-2.2 and obviously fails.
> 
> I think the CMake guile-2.0/2.2 detector can't handle having both.
> 
> Any clues?
> 
> Attached logfile from cmake... && cd build && ninja && ninja check

Did you install guile-2.2-dev as well ?

In addition you may have to clear you CMakeCache. ISTR it doesn't always 
automatically recheck dependencies once they are resolved.

Geert



___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Re: [GNC-dev] Ubuntu. Both guile-2.0 and guile-2.2 installed, can't find guile-2.2

[John Ralls]

> On May 11, 2018, at 6:29 AM, Christopher Lam  
> wrote:
> 
> As per subject.
> 
> Having successfully worked on guile-2.0, I wished to try 2.2 and 'sudo apt 
> install guile-2.2' and all was well. I can run guile-2.2.
> 
> However cmake rebuild script cannot find guile-2.2 and tries to configure 
> with guile-2.0 instead.
> 
> However the test suite runs using guile-2.2 and obviously fails.
> 
> I think the CMake guile-2.0/2.2 detector can't handle having both.
> 
> Any clues?
> 
> Attached logfile from cmake... && cd build && ninja && ninja check

Assuming you’re using a current maint clone it checks for 2.2 first, so it 
would seem to be a matter of not finding guile-2.2.

What does `pkg-config --modversion guile-2.2` return?

Regards,
John Ralls

___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Re: [GNC-dev] GnuCash Bugzilla URLs -- /bugzilla or not?

[cicko]

Excuse me for jumping the thread but I'd just like to mention that there is a
similar situation with wiki:

https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Backup

There is a redundant "wiki" sub-domain / application path combination.




--
Sent from: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/GnuCash-Dev-f1435356.html
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Re: [GNC-dev] AppImage

[cicko]

John Ralls-2 wrote
> None of the core devs have had time to look into application bundles for
> Linux. Since the Windows and Mac bundles also have pretty much all of the
> dependency libraries and associated data in them I imagine that a Flatpack
> or similar would run to about the same size, 120-180MB. 

Great. I've opened a request / discussion thread at
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=796019.

I think this might be a convenient option as quite a few users have
mentioned that they can't find a current version of GnuCash in their
distribution repositories and need to build it themselves. While I have
nothing against building software, I find it unnecessary for an ordinary
user to download development tools and libraries. Especially now that a few
technologies exist to allow convenient binary packages. In any case, the
topic is open. Let's see if we can get something rolling automatically.



--
Sent from: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/GnuCash-Dev-f1435356.html
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel