GC Search Engine

2009-03-29 Thread Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI)
For a few months now the GC archives are searchable and I am using this
functionality a lot.  This is a great addition to the site.
I do have a suggestion how to make it maybe a little bit better.
Would it be possible to add the link Next Page also to the bottom of the
page?  This way a user would not have to scroll back up in order to go to
see the remaining results of a search.

Thanks

Volker Englisch

___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel


RE: GnuCash on windows - Instructions for giving it a try

2006-10-05 Thread Englisch, Volker \(NIH/NCI\) [C]
During my first attempt I was able to get a bit further into the process
but now I am  getting stuck during the installation of MinGW.  
I've used several different mirrors but I get the same error message no
matter which one I use.  
I guess nobody else has ran into this?


  $ ./install.sh

  
  ###  Wget
  
  already installed.  skipping.

  
  ###  MSYS DTK
  
  msys dtk already installed.  skipping.

  
  ###  MinGW
  
  !!! Install g++ !!!
  !!! When asked for an installation path, specify c:\Gnucash\mingw !!!

...

  Create folder: C:\Gnucash\MinGW
  Extract: C:\Gnucash\MinGW\installed.ini... 100%
  Extracting gcc-g++-3.4.2-20040916-1.tar.gz
  untgz::extract -d 'C:\Gnucash\MinGW' -z
'c:\Gnucash\downloads\gcc-g++-3.4.2-20040916-1.tar.gz' 
  tgz_extract: bad header checksum
  Error: Failure reading from tarball.


Thanks

Volker Englisch


___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel


Unable to compile r13514

2006-03-07 Thread Englisch, Volker \(NIH/NCI\) [C]
I also keep having problems building gnucash recently.

I've been able to build gnucash from SVN many times before but since 
last week or so I am running into problems.  I know that some of these
problems are related to the version of g-wrap but since yesterday
I am seeing the following error message with a fresh copy from SVN:

...
go-marshalers.c:2:36: error: goffice/goffice-config.h: No such file or
directory
make[7]: *** [go-marshalers.lo] Error 1
make[6]: *** [all] Error 2
make[5]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[4]: *** [all] Error 2
make[7]: Leaving directory
`/home/venglisc/g2-devel/gnucash/lib/goffice-0.0.4/goffice/utils'
make[6]: Leaving directory
`/home/venglisc/g2-devel/gnucash/lib/goffice-0.0.4/goffice/utils'
make[5]: Leaving directory
`/home/venglisc/g2-devel/gnucash/lib/goffice-0.0.4/goffice'
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/home/venglisc/g2-devel/gnucash/lib/goffice-0.0.4/goffice'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/home/venglisc/g2-devel/gnucash/lib/goffice-0.0.4'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/venglisc/g2-devel/gnucash/lib'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/venglisc/g2-devel/gnucash'

The file goffice-config.h exists on my system under
  /home/venglisc/g2-devel/gnucash

I am running FC4.  

Thanks

Volker Englisch


___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel


RE: tarball POTFILE.in errors; 1.9.0 next Sunday proposed (was: Proposal: Release 1.9.0 today)

2006-02-01 Thread Englisch, Volker \(NIH/NCI\) [C]
 Does anyone of the active developers have a amd64 machine at hand? (I 
 don't.) I would certainly believe that some tests will fail on amd64
as 
 long as this is none of our actively developed target platforms...

I'm not an active developer but I do have an AMD64 running FC4 sitting
at 
home.  I would be willing to create a user account for a developer to do
whatever you need to do. 

Thanks

Volker Englisch
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel


RE: 64-bit issues, login accounts on an Athlon-64 available.

2005-12-07 Thread Englisch, Volker \(NIH/NCI\) [C]
 I took Karl up on this offer, and David Hampton and I were able to
 squish the happily-small number of 64-bit compilation issues.  If you
 see others, please speak up.

I've now been able to compile GnuCash on my 64-bit system but only 
when I drop the --enable-hbci option.  With it the compilation stops
with
this error message (I'm running FC4):

cc1: warnings being treated as errors
hbci-interaction.c: In function 'inputBoxCB':
hbci-interaction.c:363: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but
argument 2 has type 'size_t'
hbci-interaction.c:363: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but
argument 2 has type 'size_t'
hbci-interaction.c: In function 'getTanCB':
hbci-interaction.c:444: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but
argument 2 has type 'size_t'
hbci-interaction.c:444: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but
argument 2 has type 'size_t'
hbci-interaction.c: In function 'hideBoxCB':
hbci-interaction.c:512: warning: cast to pointer from integer of
different size
hbci-interaction.c:519: warning: cast to pointer from integer of
different size
hbci-interaction.c: In function 'showBoxCB':
hbci-interaction.c:555: warning: cast to pointer from integer of
different size
make[5]: *** [hbci-interaction.lo] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory
`/home/venglisc/gnucash/g2-devel/gnucash/src/import-export/hbci'
make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/home/venglisc/gnucash/g2-devel/gnucash/src/import-export/hbci'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/home/venglisc/gnucash/g2-devel/gnucash/src/import-export'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/venglisc/gnucash/g2-devel/gnucash/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/venglisc/gnucash/g2-devel/gnucash'
make: *** [all] Error 2


Thanks

Volker Englisch


___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel


RE: 64-bit issues, login accounts on an Athlon-64 available.

2005-12-07 Thread Englisch, Volker \(NIH/NCI\) [C]
 I've now been able to compile GnuCash on my 64-bit system

Just noticed that even though I can compile GC (without the
--enable-hbci
option) I can not run it:

  [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /opt/gnucash/bin/gnucash
  ERROR: In procedure dynamic-link:
  ERROR: file: libgw-wct, message: /usr/lib/libgw-wct.so.0: cannot
open 
  shared object file: No such file or directory

Thanks

Volker Englisch


___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel


RE: G2 Testing - Register Toolbar

2005-10-28 Thread Englisch, Volker \(NIH/NCI\)
  Would you like me to report these as well or should I ignore them at
the 
  moment?
 
 I don't think these are related to Gnucash.  Maybe a bug in ALSA or a
 permissions problem, but that's just a guess.
 
 -chris
 

Oh, there are plenty of other messages that are definitely related to
Gnucash.
The messages I listed just were the latest once I had on my screen.

Thanks

Volker Englisch
Contractor - MSD, Inc.
phone: (301) 496-0102  (OTSA)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel


RE: Bug Triage

2004-06-24 Thread Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI)
 Uhh... What makes you think that these two bugs are the same?  IMHO
 these two are _not_ the same bug.  88517 is about cut-and-paste losing
 transaction information, whereas 92484 is about bulk moves of
 transactions.  They are certainly different in my mind.  Why do you
 consider them the same?

What the user in 88517 wants to do _is_ moving a transaction from account A
to account B and he/she is doing it by copy/pasting.  The information that
gets lost is the reconciliation status of the pasted transaction.  
IMHO there is and should be a distinction between copying and moving
transactions.  A copied tx, one that I want to copy from two months ago for
instance, should not be entered into the register as a reconciled tx just
because the original one was reconciled.  A moved transaction, however, has
to keep all of the information except for the account information.

Both bugs listed are requesting a method to move a single tx (or multiple
transactions) from one account to another one.  Am I reading this wrong?

By the way, I don't see a mark bug as duplicate of checkbox.  I may not
have permission to do this.

Thanks

Volker Englisch
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel