Re: [GNC] Asset accounts: cost, or value?

2020-09-02 Thread Michael or Penny Novack

On 9/2/2020 11:08 AM, D. wrote:

Michael,

Could you go into more detail about how one would enter, e.g., title insurance 
in GnuCash so that it would apply to the cost basis of a property?

TIA,
David

Take a simple example. You write a check to pay something that is 
properly part of the basis:


debit    "basis"

credit   "current account"

I was assuming that the only way could have been puzzled if instead had 
done this:


debit   "some expense account

credit  "current account"

And then seen no way to get the "basis" involved. Well that transaction 
was NOT properly an expense but the "purchase" of asset (a transfer 
between asset account)



Michael D Novack

PS: Yes I know, at "settlement" when buying a house usually some complex 
transaction with lots of debits and credits



___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.


Re: [GNC] Asset accounts: cost, or value?

2020-09-02 Thread Christopher Lam
I can illustrate an example where costs etc are derived from my book.

When I purchase a house at $100,000, using a $20,000 deposit and $83,000
mortgage. Purchase costs are $3,000 - includes insurance, buyer's agent
fees etc.

The Balance line describes Asset:Settlement Running Balance.

Deposit
Asset:Settlement +20,000
Asset:Bank -20,000
Balance 20,000

Mortgage drawn
Asset:Settlement +83,000
Liability:Mortgage -83,000
Balance 103,000

House Purchase
Asset:Settlement -100,000
Asset:Fixed:House +100,000
Balance 3,000

Purchase Costs
Asset:Settlement -3,000
Expense:Stamp Duty 1,000
Expense:Buyer's Agent 1,000
Expense:Title Insurance 500
Expense:Building Insurance 500
Balance = 0

I chose to input each component as a separate transaction because they had
different dates (e.g. deposit sent before exchange of contracts).
Alternatively they could all be written as a multi-split transaction.
Selling will be a similar setup.

On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 15:16, Marcus Winston 
wrote:

> Well, yes, it isn't necessarily a gnucash question. But pen and ink are
> a bit cumbersome, and so I use gnucash.
>
> Let me illustrate, perhaps it will help to identify whether I'm
> fundamentally doing it wrong, or just have the wrong accounts.
>
> In the assets:fixed assets:house account, I have (I'm making up numbers
> to make things simple):
>
> purchase price of house: +$100,000, balance $100,000
>
> costs to purchase: +$1000, balance $101,000
>
> costs to sell: +$2000, balance $102,000
>
> capital gains: $20,000, balance $122,000
>
>
> What I'm attempting to do is see the cost or value of the house (or,
> that's what I thought it would do) in the assets:fixed assets:house
> account.  The purchase price is, of course, fine. The costs to purchase
> add to the basis, which is what I want to do in order to easily
> see/calculate (eventually) capital gains (for tax-related purposes). I
> add the selling costs before capital gains because, when I add the
> capital gains, then I get to the actual selling price of the house,
> which is convenient. It might be wrong from an accounting perspective,
> but I'm just a "regular person", not an accountant. I'm trying to figure
> out how to use GnuCash to track all this stuff.  What I see in the other
> accounts tells me I am probably doing it wrong. The "costs to purchase"
> account is an expense. But that account has a -$1000 balance, and the
> "costs to sell" account (also under Expenses) has a -$2000 balance. The
> capital gains is the only thing that's right, because that's an income
> account.
>
> The fundamental question is, should I be trying to use the assets:fixed
> assets:house account to track this stuff? What I see in there has me
> thinking that account tracks my actual costs, but when I add the capital
> gains, it appears to reflect the value of the house, not the cost.
> Hence, my original question: is the "house" account intended to track
> the value, or the cost, of the house?
>
> MW
>
>
> On 9/2/20 6:53 AM, Michael or Penny Novack wrote:
> > On 9/2/2020 8:28 AM, Marcus Winston wrote:
> >> OK, Thanks. So the "balance" in the asset account would reflect the
> >> cost of the asset, not its value. That's fine, and is what I
> >> concluded also.
> >>
> >> Next question: When I sell the house, I'm adding the costs to sell
> >> the house (title insurance, reconveyance fees, etc) to the cost of
> >> the house itself. In other words, this will increase the bottom line
> >> on the fixed asset "House" account. For two-column accounting, where
> >> does that money come from (what's the other account)? I tried using
> >> an equity account, but then I end up with a positive equity value on
> >> the house after I sell it, and that doesn't make sense (I think I
> >> should have zero equity in the house once it's sold).
> >>
> >> MW
> >
> > This isn't a gnucash question per se (you would have exactly the same
> > question were we back in the days of pen and ink on paper accounting)
> >
> > When these transactions occurred you may have entered them wrongly <<
> > BTW, maybe it is being in different jurisdictions, but you are listing
> > things like "title insurance" and "conveyance fees" as SELLER costs.
> > In my experience, it is the buyer who pays for those particular
> > things. >>
> >
> > But back to the other side of those transactions. What I suspect is
> > that you entered them incorrectly with the other side as expenses, not
> > changes to the basis.
> >
> > Michael D Novack
> >
> >
> > ___
> > gnucash-user mailing list
> > gnucash-user@gnucash.org
> > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> > If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
> > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
> > -
> > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
> 

Re: [GNC] Asset accounts: cost, or value?

2020-09-02 Thread Marcus Winston
Well, yes, it isn't necessarily a gnucash question. But pen and ink are 
a bit cumbersome, and so I use gnucash.


Let me illustrate, perhaps it will help to identify whether I'm 
fundamentally doing it wrong, or just have the wrong accounts.


In the assets:fixed assets:house account, I have (I'm making up numbers 
to make things simple):


purchase price of house: +$100,000, balance $100,000

costs to purchase: +$1000, balance $101,000

costs to sell: +$2000, balance $102,000

capital gains: $20,000, balance $122,000


What I'm attempting to do is see the cost or value of the house (or, 
that's what I thought it would do) in the assets:fixed assets:house 
account.  The purchase price is, of course, fine. The costs to purchase 
add to the basis, which is what I want to do in order to easily 
see/calculate (eventually) capital gains (for tax-related purposes). I 
add the selling costs before capital gains because, when I add the 
capital gains, then I get to the actual selling price of the house, 
which is convenient. It might be wrong from an accounting perspective, 
but I'm just a "regular person", not an accountant. I'm trying to figure 
out how to use GnuCash to track all this stuff.  What I see in the other 
accounts tells me I am probably doing it wrong. The "costs to purchase" 
account is an expense. But that account has a -$1000 balance, and the 
"costs to sell" account (also under Expenses) has a -$2000 balance. The 
capital gains is the only thing that's right, because that's an income 
account.


The fundamental question is, should I be trying to use the assets:fixed 
assets:house account to track this stuff? What I see in there has me 
thinking that account tracks my actual costs, but when I add the capital 
gains, it appears to reflect the value of the house, not the cost. 
Hence, my original question: is the "house" account intended to track 
the value, or the cost, of the house?


MW


On 9/2/20 6:53 AM, Michael or Penny Novack wrote:

On 9/2/2020 8:28 AM, Marcus Winston wrote:
OK, Thanks. So the "balance" in the asset account would reflect the 
cost of the asset, not its value. That's fine, and is what I 
concluded also.


Next question: When I sell the house, I'm adding the costs to sell 
the house (title insurance, reconveyance fees, etc) to the cost of 
the house itself. In other words, this will increase the bottom line 
on the fixed asset "House" account. For two-column accounting, where 
does that money come from (what's the other account)? I tried using 
an equity account, but then I end up with a positive equity value on 
the house after I sell it, and that doesn't make sense (I think I 
should have zero equity in the house once it's sold).


MW


This isn't a gnucash question per se (you would have exactly the same 
question were we back in the days of pen and ink on paper accounting)


When these transactions occurred you may have entered them wrongly << 
BTW, maybe it is being in different jurisdictions, but you are listing 
things like "title insurance" and "conveyance fees" as SELLER costs. 
In my experience, it is the buyer who pays for those particular 
things. >>


But back to the other side of those transactions. What I suspect is 
that you entered them incorrectly with the other side as expenses, not 
changes to the basis.


Michael D Novack


___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.

-
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.


Re: [GNC] Asset accounts: cost, or value?

2020-09-02 Thread D. via gnucash-user
Michael, 

Could you go into more detail about how one would enter, e.g., title insurance 
in GnuCash so that it would apply to the cost basis of a property? 

TIA,
David


 Original Message 
From: Michael or Penny Novack 
Sent: Wed Sep 02 09:53:54 EDT 2020
To: gnucash-user@gnucash.org
Subject: Re: [GNC] Asset accounts: cost, or value?

On 9/2/2020 8:28 AM, Marcus Winston wrote:
> OK, Thanks. So the "balance" in the asset account would reflect the 
> cost of the asset, not its value. That's fine, and is what I concluded 
> also.
>
> Next question: When I sell the house, I'm adding the costs to sell the 
> house (title insurance, reconveyance fees, etc) to the cost of the 
> house itself. In other words, this will increase the bottom line on 
> the fixed asset "House" account. For two-column accounting, where does 
> that money come from (what's the other account)? I tried using an 
> equity account, but then I end up with a positive equity value on the 
> house after I sell it, and that doesn't make sense (I think I should 
> have zero equity in the house once it's sold).
>
> MW

This isn't a gnucash question per se (you would have exactly the same 
question were we back in the days of pen and ink on paper accounting)

When these transactions occurred you may have entered them wrongly << 
BTW, maybe it is being in different jurisdictions, but you are listing 
things like "title insurance" and "conveyance fees" as SELLER costs. In 
my experience, it is the buyer who pays for those particular things. >>

But back to the other side of those transactions. What I suspect is that 
you entered them incorrectly with the other side as expenses, not 
changes to the basis.

Michael D Novack


___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.


Re: [GNC] Asset accounts: cost, or value?

2020-09-02 Thread Michael or Penny Novack

On 9/2/2020 8:28 AM, Marcus Winston wrote:
OK, Thanks. So the "balance" in the asset account would reflect the 
cost of the asset, not its value. That's fine, and is what I concluded 
also.


Next question: When I sell the house, I'm adding the costs to sell the 
house (title insurance, reconveyance fees, etc) to the cost of the 
house itself. In other words, this will increase the bottom line on 
the fixed asset "House" account. For two-column accounting, where does 
that money come from (what's the other account)? I tried using an 
equity account, but then I end up with a positive equity value on the 
house after I sell it, and that doesn't make sense (I think I should 
have zero equity in the house once it's sold).


MW


This isn't a gnucash question per se (you would have exactly the same 
question were we back in the days of pen and ink on paper accounting)


When these transactions occurred you may have entered them wrongly << 
BTW, maybe it is being in different jurisdictions, but you are listing 
things like "title insurance" and "conveyance fees" as SELLER costs. In 
my experience, it is the buyer who pays for those particular things. >>


But back to the other side of those transactions. What I suspect is that 
you entered them incorrectly with the other side as expenses, not 
changes to the basis.


Michael D Novack


___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.


Re: [GNC] Asset accounts: cost, or value?

2020-09-02 Thread Peter West
In my neck of the woods, sale prices of houses are recorded with the records of 
change of ownership. Sale values may not be available until some time after the 
sale, but they will appear. Online real estate sites can tell you the history 
of sales and sale prices in whatever area you are interested in. You can 
therefore get a reasonable idea of what is happening to values in your area.

If the purpose of your personal accounts is to inform you – not some external 
authority – of your equity standing, is it better to stick to the purchase 
price of an asset you may have had for a decade or more, or to include an 
estimate of the sale value of the property? In any case, external authorities 
are likely to want an estimate of current market value.

Any corporation that does NOT provide estimates of appreciation or depreciation 
of capital resources is not reporting accurately, as far as I can tell.

--
Peter West
p...@pbw.id.au
“Ha! What have you to do with us, Jesus of Nazareth? Have you come to destroy 
us? I know who you are—the Holy One of God.”

> On 2 Sep 2020, at 10:28 pm, Marcus Winston  
> wrote:
> 
> OK, Thanks. So the "balance" in the asset account would reflect the cost of 
> the asset, not its value. That's fine, and is what I concluded also.
> 
> Next question: When I sell the house, I'm adding the costs to sell the house 
> (title insurance, reconveyance fees, etc) to the cost of the house itself. In 
> other words, this will increase the bottom line on the fixed asset "House" 
> account. For two-column accounting, where does that money come from (what's 
> the other account)? I tried using an equity account, but then I end up with a 
> positive equity value on the house after I sell it, and that doesn't make 
> sense (I think I should have zero equity in the house once it's sold).
> 
> MW
> 
> On 9/1/20 10:38 PM, Stan Brown wrote:
>> On 2020-09-01 19:49, Marcus Winston wrote:
>>> I had thought that the Assets:Fixed assets:House would reflect the value of
>>> the house. But after putting the purchase price of the house, and then
>>> adding the costs to purchase (recording fees, appraisal, etc), I conclude
>>> that the House account actually reflects the total cost of the house, and
>>> not necessarily its value. First question: is that a correct view of the
>>> Assets:Fixed assets:House1 account?
>> Any tracking of value that you might do would be mere speculation. Even
>> an appraisal is no indication of how much your house is really worth:
>> both when I moved earlier this year both houses' appraisals were about
>> 20% different from the selling price.
>> 
>> Valuing assets on a balance sheet at somebody's guess of what they're
>> worth, known as "writing to market", is part of shady accounting
>> practices and, if I'm not mistaken, partly responsible for the real
>> estate crash of 2008-2011. Don't do it!
>> 
>> And of course for tax purposes, as you indicated, you _have_ to work
>> from actual costs, not from guesses about value. Keeping your books on a
>> cost basis will make that less difficult when you make out your tax returns.
>> 
> ___
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user@gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
> -
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.


Re: [GNC] Asset accounts: cost, or value?

2020-09-02 Thread Marcus Winston
OK, Thanks. So the "balance" in the asset account would reflect the cost 
of the asset, not its value. That's fine, and is what I concluded also.


Next question: When I sell the house, I'm adding the costs to sell the 
house (title insurance, reconveyance fees, etc) to the cost of the house 
itself. In other words, this will increase the bottom line on the fixed 
asset "House" account. For two-column accounting, where does that money 
come from (what's the other account)? I tried using an equity account, 
but then I end up with a positive equity value on the house after I sell 
it, and that doesn't make sense (I think I should have zero equity in 
the house once it's sold).


MW

On 9/1/20 10:38 PM, Stan Brown wrote:

On 2020-09-01 19:49, Marcus Winston wrote:

I had thought that the Assets:Fixed assets:House would reflect the value of
the house. But after putting the purchase price of the house, and then
adding the costs to purchase (recording fees, appraisal, etc), I conclude
that the House account actually reflects the total cost of the house, and
not necessarily its value. First question: is that a correct view of the
Assets:Fixed assets:House1 account?

Any tracking of value that you might do would be mere speculation. Even
an appraisal is no indication of how much your house is really worth:
both when I moved earlier this year both houses' appraisals were about
20% different from the selling price.

Valuing assets on a balance sheet at somebody's guess of what they're
worth, known as "writing to market", is part of shady accounting
practices and, if I'm not mistaken, partly responsible for the real
estate crash of 2008-2011. Don't do it!

And of course for tax purposes, as you indicated, you _have_ to work
from actual costs, not from guesses about value. Keeping your books on a
cost basis will make that less difficult when you make out your tax returns.


___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.