Re: [GNUnet-developers] womb / maintainers description rewrite
Mike just told me the changes will (probably) be done this weekend. Nils Gillmann transcribed 2.9K bytes: > Okay, done. > Or at least initiated. > Blurb description change has to wait a while longer. > > Nils Gillmann transcribed 2.5K bytes: > > Christian Grothoff transcribed 4.1K bytes: > > > On 06/28/2018 04:13 PM, Nils Gillmann wrote: > > > > link in line 1 returns: > > > > > > > > package: gnunet > > > > doc-category: Internet > > > > doc-summary: Secure, decentralized, peer-to-peer networking framework > > > > doc-url: http://gnunet.org/book > > > > gplv3-status: depends-on-mysql (gnumaint-reply 20 Aug 2007 20:40:48) > > > > > > Should be corrected to AGPLv3+. (or 'yes'). > > > > > > > activity-status: ok 201404008 (0.10.1, java-0.10.1, gtk-0.10.1, > > > > fuse-0.10.0/20131222) > > > > > > > > package: libextractor > > > > logo: /software/libextractor/extractor_logo.png > > > > doc-category: Audio > > > > doc-summary: Library to extract meta-data from media files > > > > doc-url: htmlxref > > > > gplv3-status: depends-on-gnunet (gnumaint-reply 20 Aug 2007 20:40:48) > > > > > > Should be corrected to GPLv3+. (or 'yes'). > > > > > > > activity-status: stale 20131223 (1.3) > > > > > > > > package: libmicrohttpd > > > > copyright-holder: notfsf > > > > language: c > > > > doc-category: Libraries > > > > doc-summary: C library implementing an HTTP 1.1 server > > > > doc-url: /software/libmicrohttpd/manual/ > > > > gplv3-status: depends-on-gnunet-lgplv2.1+ > > > > > > Should be LGPLv3+. > > > > > > > For 1 I propose to correct the doc-url entry, we already have a first > > > > initial state of https://docs.gnunet.org publicly accessible. > > > > > > Sure. > > > > > > > license status does only reflect the latest release (maybe its intended > > > > to be that way?). > > > > > > No, it's just way outdated. > > > > > > > libextractor is not stale in development. > > > > > > And had more recent releases. > > > > > > > lmhd had more recent releases I think. > > > > > > Yes, 0.9.59 by now. > > > > > > > For 2: Let us rewrite the text. I've seen that you were active at the > > > > new > > > > website with a small fitting description, and we should sync that. The > > > > current package description was adjusted by myself at some point in the > > > > last couple of years. > > > > > > Well, that sounds like you know _how_ to do this, so please do! :-) > > > > > > > Thanks for you reply. > > > > I know who to call (not the Ghostbusters). > > That's all. I'll see what I can achieve. > > > > I think we wait for adjusting the description > > text of gnunet until the new website is online > > and the description text production ready? At > > least that's what I would do. > > > > > ___ > > > GNUnet-developers mailing list > > > GNUnet-developers@gnu.org > > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers > > > > > > ___ > > GNUnet-developers mailing list > > GNUnet-developers@gnu.org > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers > > ___ > GNUnet-developers mailing list > GNUnet-developers@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers ___ GNUnet-developers mailing list GNUnet-developers@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
Re: [GNUnet-developers] womb / maintainers description rewrite
Okay, done. Or at least initiated. Blurb description change has to wait a while longer. Nils Gillmann transcribed 2.5K bytes: > Christian Grothoff transcribed 4.1K bytes: > > On 06/28/2018 04:13 PM, Nils Gillmann wrote: > > > link in line 1 returns: > > > > > > package: gnunet > > > doc-category: Internet > > > doc-summary: Secure, decentralized, peer-to-peer networking framework > > > doc-url: http://gnunet.org/book > > > gplv3-status: depends-on-mysql (gnumaint-reply 20 Aug 2007 20:40:48) > > > > Should be corrected to AGPLv3+. (or 'yes'). > > > > > activity-status: ok 201404008 (0.10.1, java-0.10.1, gtk-0.10.1, > > > fuse-0.10.0/20131222) > > > > > > package: libextractor > > > logo: /software/libextractor/extractor_logo.png > > > doc-category: Audio > > > doc-summary: Library to extract meta-data from media files > > > doc-url: htmlxref > > > gplv3-status: depends-on-gnunet (gnumaint-reply 20 Aug 2007 20:40:48) > > > > Should be corrected to GPLv3+. (or 'yes'). > > > > > activity-status: stale 20131223 (1.3) > > > > > > package: libmicrohttpd > > > copyright-holder: notfsf > > > language: c > > > doc-category: Libraries > > > doc-summary: C library implementing an HTTP 1.1 server > > > doc-url: /software/libmicrohttpd/manual/ > > > gplv3-status: depends-on-gnunet-lgplv2.1+ > > > > Should be LGPLv3+. > > > > > For 1 I propose to correct the doc-url entry, we already have a first > > > initial state of https://docs.gnunet.org publicly accessible. > > > > Sure. > > > > > license status does only reflect the latest release (maybe its intended > > > to be that way?). > > > > No, it's just way outdated. > > > > > libextractor is not stale in development. > > > > And had more recent releases. > > > > > lmhd had more recent releases I think. > > > > Yes, 0.9.59 by now. > > > > > For 2: Let us rewrite the text. I've seen that you were active at the new > > > website with a small fitting description, and we should sync that. The > > > current package description was adjusted by myself at some point in the > > > last couple of years. > > > > Well, that sounds like you know _how_ to do this, so please do! :-) > > > > Thanks for you reply. > > I know who to call (not the Ghostbusters). > That's all. I'll see what I can achieve. > > I think we wait for adjusting the description > text of gnunet until the new website is online > and the description text production ready? At > least that's what I would do. > > > ___ > > GNUnet-developers mailing list > > GNUnet-developers@gnu.org > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers > > > ___ > GNUnet-developers mailing list > GNUnet-developers@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers ___ GNUnet-developers mailing list GNUnet-developers@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
Re: [GNUnet-developers] womb / maintainers description rewrite
Christian Grothoff transcribed 4.1K bytes: > On 06/28/2018 04:13 PM, Nils Gillmann wrote: > > link in line 1 returns: > > > > package: gnunet > > doc-category: Internet > > doc-summary: Secure, decentralized, peer-to-peer networking framework > > doc-url: http://gnunet.org/book > > gplv3-status: depends-on-mysql (gnumaint-reply 20 Aug 2007 20:40:48) > > Should be corrected to AGPLv3+. (or 'yes'). > > > activity-status: ok 201404008 (0.10.1, java-0.10.1, gtk-0.10.1, > > fuse-0.10.0/20131222) > > > > package: libextractor > > logo: /software/libextractor/extractor_logo.png > > doc-category: Audio > > doc-summary: Library to extract meta-data from media files > > doc-url: htmlxref > > gplv3-status: depends-on-gnunet (gnumaint-reply 20 Aug 2007 20:40:48) > > Should be corrected to GPLv3+. (or 'yes'). > > > activity-status: stale 20131223 (1.3) > > > > package: libmicrohttpd > > copyright-holder: notfsf > > language: c > > doc-category: Libraries > > doc-summary: C library implementing an HTTP 1.1 server > > doc-url: /software/libmicrohttpd/manual/ > > gplv3-status: depends-on-gnunet-lgplv2.1+ > > Should be LGPLv3+. > > > For 1 I propose to correct the doc-url entry, we already have a first > > initial state of https://docs.gnunet.org publicly accessible. > > Sure. > > > license status does only reflect the latest release (maybe its intended > > to be that way?). > > No, it's just way outdated. > > > libextractor is not stale in development. > > And had more recent releases. > > > lmhd had more recent releases I think. > > Yes, 0.9.59 by now. > > > For 2: Let us rewrite the text. I've seen that you were active at the new > > website with a small fitting description, and we should sync that. The > > current package description was adjusted by myself at some point in the > > last couple of years. > > Well, that sounds like you know _how_ to do this, so please do! :-) > Thanks for you reply. I know who to call (not the Ghostbusters). That's all. I'll see what I can achieve. I think we wait for adjusting the description text of gnunet until the new website is online and the description text production ready? At least that's what I would do. > ___ > GNUnet-developers mailing list > GNUnet-developers@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers ___ GNUnet-developers mailing list GNUnet-developers@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
Re: [GNUnet-developers] womb / maintainers description rewrite
On 06/28/2018 04:13 PM, Nils Gillmann wrote: > link in line 1 returns: > > package: gnunet > doc-category: Internet > doc-summary: Secure, decentralized, peer-to-peer networking framework > doc-url: http://gnunet.org/book > gplv3-status: depends-on-mysql (gnumaint-reply 20 Aug 2007 20:40:48) Should be corrected to AGPLv3+. (or 'yes'). > activity-status: ok 201404008 (0.10.1, java-0.10.1, gtk-0.10.1, > fuse-0.10.0/20131222) > > package: libextractor > logo: /software/libextractor/extractor_logo.png > doc-category: Audio > doc-summary: Library to extract meta-data from media files > doc-url: htmlxref > gplv3-status: depends-on-gnunet (gnumaint-reply 20 Aug 2007 20:40:48) Should be corrected to GPLv3+. (or 'yes'). > activity-status: stale 20131223 (1.3) > > package: libmicrohttpd > copyright-holder: notfsf > language: c > doc-category: Libraries > doc-summary: C library implementing an HTTP 1.1 server > doc-url: /software/libmicrohttpd/manual/ > gplv3-status: depends-on-gnunet-lgplv2.1+ Should be LGPLv3+. > For 1 I propose to correct the doc-url entry, we already have a first > initial state of https://docs.gnunet.org publicly accessible. Sure. > license status does only reflect the latest release (maybe its intended > to be that way?). No, it's just way outdated. > libextractor is not stale in development. And had more recent releases. > lmhd had more recent releases I think. Yes, 0.9.59 by now. > For 2: Let us rewrite the text. I've seen that you were active at the new > website with a small fitting description, and we should sync that. The > current package description was adjusted by myself at some point in the > last couple of years. Well, that sounds like you know _how_ to do this, so please do! :-) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ GNUnet-developers mailing list GNUnet-developers@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers