Re: Keyserver

2005-06-03 Thread gpg . 20 . subu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Two Request
~~


Can some one give me the correct entry I should place in my config
file for the best key-server


Can I have an option that practically helps me to search thru several
key servers .. i.e. search the second (specified keyserver) if the
first (specified keyserver) did not have the key, use the third
(keyserver ..) if the second did not have the key  and so on


TIA

Subu



Dan Mundy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> The fastest and most reliable keyserver I have come across is this:
>
> website usage - http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de/
> gpg --keyserver usage - hkp://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de/
>
> These keyservers synchronize very often (i.e. instantaneously) with
> other keyservers. The website also looks very cool =P. So these would
> be my choice.
>


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: key : http://www.geocities.com/mail_to_subu/pubkey.txt
Comment: key : http://maniams2.tripod.com/Sign/pubkey.txt
Comment: fingerprint 174E F2B0 C7D2 5AED 0FEC  EE1D 686C D1C8 0BE4 6FA2

iD8DBQFCoF6qaGzRyAvkb6IRAqmNAKCMvYL7OSgniZFuijtKcxHtzxwVcACdFjPC
vNFgOB6jrlRvziZN3N6YhwY=
=Q0Tj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Help on Enigmail - Mozilla 1.7.7. with Win XPP

2005-06-03 Thread gpg . 20 . subu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



Dear Dan

Thanks for those answers. Thanks to help from this group, PGPNET and
PGP-basics on yahoo groups, I've progressed further

Should I have other questions, I shall post them here

Thanks again

Subu


Dan Mundy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> >I'm totally new to GPG (I know the concepts behind PGP)
>
>
> well you can rest easy because gpg is basically a free command line
> version of pgp, and the two are fully compatible.
>
> >I use Win XPP + Mozilla 1.7.7. I've recently downloaded enigmail to
> >use with Mozilla - as I was advised that Enigmail has most
> >functions for a startup user
>
>
> good choice. i use enigmail for my email encryption and signing with gpg.
>

[]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: key : http://www.geocities.com/mail_to_subu/pubkey.txt
Comment: key : http://maniams2.tripod.com/Sign/pubkey.txt
Comment: fingerprint 174E F2B0 C7D2 5AED 0FEC  EE1D 686C D1C8 0BE4 6FA2

iD8DBQFCoFwWaGzRyAvkb6IRAsRuAJ49O5YQpPoUAOpMC8rlgxB4lDdqKACfWxmc
O47YUcIYzsefx3Gdqy+fCAI=
=BkuG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


How to install your GPG keys to a USB dongle for Windows

2005-06-03 Thread Dan Mundy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
 
i had just the opposite problem. i can't find any kind of a linux
driver for my USB drive. but i quickly figured out how to set this up
in windows without regedit. here's what you do.

1. open gpg.conf (located in your "application data" folder)

2. add the following lines (without quotes) after your
keyserver-options line:
"keyring x:\keys\pubring.gpg
secret-keyring x:\keys\secring.gpg
no-default-keyring"

x:\ is your USB drive and \keys\ is your keyring folder.

3. from your "application data" folder, copy "pubring.gpg" and
"secring.gpg" to x:\keys\.

that is all you have to do. and it won't mess up your registry if you
make a typo.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD8DBQFCmbptTbbnG4BhqDARAukTAJ455C//sAT3SyyrcuXK0UQJp/qpywCgnQ2G
hAevnwg0Ex3rwDrOzpyL6IY=
=2xi3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Help on Enigmail - Mozilla 1.7.7. with Win XPP

2005-06-03 Thread Dan Mundy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
 
> - Lets say I get a signed message - like the ones from this
> "gnupg-users" list - I click on the "pen" ICON (displayed by
> Mozilla) to check the signature - I get a message "public key not
> found" - I proceed to try and download the public key from one of
> the 4 servers listed in Enigmail ~ I suppose defaults as of now in
> Enigmail - I get either a *socket error* or a *key not found error*
>
>
> - How do I proceed further ?
>
> - Is there a better way to import public keys into enigmail ?

make sure enigmail is set up correctly. in mozilla mail, go to
Enigmail->Preferences. make sure this is set correctly:

"Basic" tab:
GnuPG executable path: x:\\gpg.exe where x:\ is your gpg install path.

there are better ways to import keys into enigmail:

1. type "gpg --keyserver  --recv-keys " at a command prompt.

- ---OR---

1. go to a keyserver with a search engine (i.e.
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371) and search for the name of the owner of the
key you want.

2. when the results come up, look for the key you want and click on
the key id

3. the pgp public key block will come up. copy that into notepad and
save it as a .gpg or .asc file.

4. type "gpg --import x:\xxx\xxx.gpg" at a command prompt.

> - where is the public key ring stored by enigmail ?

Enigmail takes its keyring from gpg's public keyring. it is located at
x:\\pubring.gpg

i hope this helps, and good luck with enigmail!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD8DBQFCmcwfTbbnG4BhqDARAqw3AKDyvaThXtGITJ/cj/Se6fY6UA5+wQCfQpyp
T8HPPyd0ZTlQpQaII3bqZcQ=
=P6mF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: IBM to Provide Security w/o Sacrificing Privacy Using Hash

2005-06-03 Thread gpg . 20 . subu

Hi Alex

Thanks for your good, informative reply

I'll try and catch up with the recommended reading 

Subu


Alex Mauer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>I thought that two *non* identical names - as in case below will *not*
>>create the same hash
>>If it will, what is the probability ? 
>
>
>The probability of this happening is extremely low.
>
>For a 128-bit hash, such as md5, the probability is 1 in 2^128 (1 in
>340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456)
>
>For a 160-bit hash, such as sha-1 which PGP uses, the probability is 1
>in 2^160, 1 in
>1,461,501,637,330,902,918,203,684,832,716,283,019,655,932,542,976).
>

[.]

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Problems when trying to create a second keyring

2005-06-03 Thread gpg . 20 . subu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



Hi

I wish to create a second keyring on my machine to avoid
crowding and to manage yagoo groups keys on independent keyrings

Problems when trying to create a second keyring



~ I'm trying to create a second keyring - for PGPNET members' keys

~ My pubring.gpg is in the directory c:\Documents and
Settings\user\Application Data\gnupg\

~ My gpg.conf is located in the same directory c:\Documents and
Settings\user\Application Data\gnupg

~ I have added the following to my gpg.conf
~~
secret-keyring c:\documents and settings\user\application
data\gnupg\secring.gpg
keyring c:\documents and settings\user\application
data\gnupg\pubring.gpg
keyring c:\documents and settings\user\application data\gnupg\pgpnet.gpg

~ I have administrator rights on my machine - So rights / permissions
to create files are NOT a problem.

~ I had installed GnuPG using the same login etc. on this machine,
again user rights is not the issue

~ Neither winPT nor Enigmail are running now

~ Other normal gpg commands like --Decrypt etc are working from
command prompt

~ Now when I try to import PGPNET_Keys.asc into the second keyring
"pgpnet.gpg" with the command "gpg --import PGPNET_Keys.asc" I get the
following errors

=== start of command line output =

C:\gpg --import PGPNET_Keys.asc

gpg: keyblock resource `c:\documents and settings\user\application
data\gnupg\pgpnet.gpg': file open error

gpg: key 01C3E2A9: "Jeff Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" not
changed

gpg: renaming `C:/Documents and Settings/user/Application
Data/gnupg\pubring.gpg ' to `C:/Documents and
Settings/user/Application Data/gnupg\pubring.bak' failed: Permission
denied

gpg: error writing keyring `C:/Documents and Settings/user/Application
Data/gnupg\pubring.gpg': file rename error

gpg: key E65CF0EE: public key "[User ID not found]" imported

gpg: error reading `PGPNET_Keys.asc': file rename error

gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.

gpg: import from `PGPNET_Keys.asc' failed: file rename error

gpg: Total number processed: 1

gpg:   imported: 1

gpg:  unchanged: 1

= end of command line output ===


Where am I going wrong ?


Any help is appreciated


TIA

subu

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: key : http://www.geocities.com/mail_to_subu/pubkey.txt
Comment: key : http://maniams2.tripod.com/Sign/pubkey.txt

iD8DBQFCl5HraGzRyAvkb6IRAtIvAKC3ps4ToJbXxx/jrGwT71EBreHzLQCgxuEp
+Ggro5yo98w8mEnZ5370OlQ=
=21VA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


(no subject)

2005-06-03 Thread Dan Mundy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
 
hey everyone, just letting you all know i'm new to mailing lists.

by the way, here's my public key. make sure to sign it!

Public key for 0x4DB6E71B8061A830
- -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
 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==
=LLgi
- -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD8DBQFCmQgrTbbnG4BhqDARAo3oAJ9GrFLwwwrr1h/uUSGtJaMCVELCsACbBV6t
bD3Fx7AW6bJfxaGX8gkUbBQ=
=bvJM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Version 1.4.2. for Win XPP ? / was Re: Additional self-signature

2005-06-03 Thread gpg . 20 . subu
David Shaw - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>
>"Newer keys" is 1.4.2 and later.  I'm sorry I didn't make that clear.
>

Is the above version released for Win XPP as well ?

Any URL ?

TIA

Subu


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: IBM to Provide Security w/o Sacrificing Privacy Using Hash

2005-06-03 Thread gpg . 20 . subu

Hi Alex

Thanks for your good, informative reply

I'll try and catch up with the recommended reading 

Subu


Alex Mauer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>I thought that two *non* identical names - as in case below will *not*
>>create the same hash
>>If it will, what is the probability ? 
>
>
>The probability of this happening is extremely low.
>
>For a 128-bit hash, such as md5, the probability is 1 in 2^128 (1 in
>340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456)
>
>For a 160-bit hash, such as sha-1 which PGP uses, the probability is 1
>in 2^160, 1 in
>1,461,501,637,330,902,918,203,684,832,716,283,019,655,932,542,976).
>

[.]

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: chrooting gnupg

2005-06-03 Thread Joerg Schmitz-Linneweber

Hi Christian!

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

...
does anyone here know by chance, what I have to provide to gnupg in order to 
run in a chrooted environment? Providing the libs obviously is not enough. 
I'm suspecting /dev/random or /dev/urandom or sth. the like, but in my tests 
it did not work properly (hangs) - due to entropy, I'd assume? 

Got no clue, how entropy is handled in a chroot, nor if this IS the problem. 
I'd appreciate any hints.
What does "strace gpg_chroot --version_or_anything" reveal on this 
chroot-ed binary?


Salut, Jörg

--
gpg/pgp key # 0xd7fa4512
fingerprint 4e89 6967 9cb2 f548 a806  7e8b fcf4 2053 d7fa 4512

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


please read the documentation Re: (no subject)

2005-06-03 Thread Gregor Zattler
Hi Dan,
* Dan Mundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [28. Mai. 2005]:
> hey everyone, just letting you all know i'm new to mailing lists.
> 
> by the way, here's my public key. make sure to sign it!
> 
> Public key for 0x4DB6E71B8061A830
> -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
>  
> mQGiBEJuhSERBADLM03wfD19tlfpwGCFhb3oHgLe/9Z2d9N9rLRNk77ISV3w9SgM

You are new to public key cryptography also, aren't you?  Please
read the documentation, especially:

http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html#AEN335

Ciao, Gregor

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


SmartCard + Evolution

2005-06-03 Thread Federico Munerotto
Il sab, 2005-05-28 alle 10:47, Matthias Kirschner ha scritto:
> Hi Fede,
> sorry in taking so long in writing.
> 
> * Federico Munerotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-22 19:11:49 +0200]:
> 
> > OK. I'll be tester.
> 
> Thank you. If it's ok I would like to move this discussion to
> , as there are also other people who are probably
> able to help you. 
> 
> Can you please resent it to this list? 
> 
> Thank you very much,
> Matze
Just wait for a little bit more. In the past days I have been busy in
syncronizing palm device/PC/mobile (I lost all my mobile contacts!).
I still haven't tryed with evolution, yet.
I think that the files in /etc/hotplug/usb/ (to see the USB smartcard
reader) fight with my USB bluetooth dongle, but it a first impression I
will dig on it more (in the worst case i'll avoid to plug the two things
in the same time).
-- 
Fede
_
   mune (at) fsfe.orgIng. Federico Munerotto   
   homehttp://www.krl.it/~mune
Public key http://www.krl.it/~mune/personal/misc/pk/pk.html
_
You are sick, twisted and perverted.  I like that in a person.


signature.asc
Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


1er contacto

2005-06-03 Thread Hernan Costante
Buen dia.
Ante todo me presento, mi nombre es Hernan soy Analista de seguridad.
Primariamente me gustaria saber si hay gente que hable español.

Mas adelante les consultare sobre unos proyectos que tengo en mente.

Saludos,
Hernan

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: OpenPGP Smartcard Advantages

2005-06-03 Thread Alex L. Mauer

Werner Koch wrote:


The only thing a malicious host can do is to lock the card (by sending
several times a wrong PIN) and to trick you into signing or decrypting
data.


This just made me think.

Wouldn't it thus be trivial [for a malicious host] to destroy a smart
card (by sending the wrong admin pin repeatedly)?

-Alex Mauer "hawke"
--
Bad - You get pulled over for doing 90 in a school zone and you're drunk
off your ass again at three in the afternoon.
Worse - The cop is drunk too, and he's a mean drunk.
FUCK! - A mean drunk that's actually a swarm of semi-sentient
flesh-eating beetles.
gpg/gpg key id: 51192FF2 @ subkeys.pgp.net


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: 1er contacto

2005-06-03 Thread Youssef Aoun
Hola,
Ma llamo Youssef (Jose en espanol), soy Libanes y hablo espanol.
Me encantare comunicar con usted en su idioma.

Hastal luego.

Cordialmente,
Youssef Aoun

/* AOUN Youssef - 3eme annee ENST Bretagne */
/* Technopole Brest Iroise - CS83818   */
/* 29238 Brest Cedex 3 - France */
/* Tel: 0033 2 29 00 17 35 - Mobile: 0033 6 60 36 69 71*/
/* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] */



Hernan Costante wrote:
> Buen dia.
> Ante todo me presento, mi nombre es Hernan soy Analista de seguridad.
> Primariamente me gustaria saber si hay gente que hable español.
> 
> Mas adelante les consultare sobre unos proyectos que tengo en mente.
> 
> Saludos,
> Hernan
> 
> ___
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
> 

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Sign my key - Was (no subject)

2005-06-03 Thread Francis Gulotta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

How do we know it's really yours or that you are really you? I'll accept
that this message was signed with it, but by signing you key it means I
have no doubt that it really does indeed belong to Dan Mundy. And I've
nver met him.

I personally don't have any signatures except from my other identities
(who have seperate keys instead of subkeys), I will have more, I'm
waiting for my local LUG's keysigning party after their next meeting. To
miss-quote someone else here. (It's got the same jist)

"People travel long and far to get their key's signed."

I'd give you some links off hand (if I had any on hand) for how to find
any keysigning parties or people in your area who will meet with you to
sign your key. You should look yourself, and I'm sure there are plenty
of other people here who have those links handy.

Good luck.

- -Francis

Dan Mundy wrote:
> hey everyone, just letting you all know i'm new to mailing lists.
> 
> by the way, here's my public key. make sure to sign it!
> 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCoIAoTJEaZCt0gQsRAk0oAJ4vOh/8Vrfw+dysa4UoPDfOhexQdwCfeB4r
gZogKpH5OCVXUXyOw0kKtNQ=
=W/a9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: OpenPGP Smartcard Advantages

2005-06-03 Thread Jan Niehusmann
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 09:30:22AM -0500, Alex L. Mauer wrote:
> Wouldn't it thus be trivial [for a malicious host] to destroy a smart
> card (by sending the wrong admin pin repeatedly)?

It is - but a malicious card reader could also fry the card with some
high voltage pulses. But at least you know that something bad happend,
you know who (or at least which host - it may have been cracked) did it,
and you did know the risk when you put the card into the reader. And it's
not worse than losing the card.

I wondered if the card couldn't just erase itself completly when the
wrong Admin-PIN is entered three times. This would at least save the
card itself, which is worth some euros. But OTOH, just locking the card
is probably easier to implement in a safe way (it's an atomic operation
which can't be aborted by just turning of power, for example).

Yours,
Jan


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: [Fwd: RE: 1er contacto]

2005-06-03 Thread Hernan Costante
Gracias!
yo soy de Capital Federal, Argentina.

Les comento cual es una de mis ideas.
Actualmente trabajo con una notebook la cual tengo en una partición
WinXP y en otra un Debian, además de estas tengo una partición más
grande en la cual tengo los documentos de trabajo.
Lo que estoy intentando hacer es que la partición en donde se
encuentran los documentos se encuentre encriptada y pueda ser accedida
por ambos SO.
También que la encripción y desencripción sea automática.

Se que PGP tiene esta funcionalidad pero la licencia es excesivamente cara.

Saludos,
Hernán


El 3/06/05, Youssef Aoun<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Eso es de Juan Neufeld
> 
>  Original Message 
> Subject: RE: 1er contacto
> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:06:22 -0300
> From: Juan Neufeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Youssef Aoun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Hola:
> Soy Juan Carlos Neufeld de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
> Hoy me incorporé al gnupg-users group.
> 
> Por favor hazle llegar mi email a "Hernan Constante", porque no figuraba
> su email".
> 
> Muchas gracias.
> 
> -Mensaje original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> En nombre de Youssef Aoun
> Enviado el: Viernes, 03 de Junio de 2005 12:23
> Para: Hernan Costante
> CC: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> Asunto: Re: 1er contacto
> 
> Hola,
> Ma llamo Youssef (Jose en espanol), soy Libanes y hablo espanol.
> Me encantare comunicar con usted en su idioma.
> 
> Hastal luego.
> 
> Cordialmente,
> Youssef Aoun
> 
> /* AOUN Youssef - 3eme annee ENST Bretagne */
> /* Technopole Brest Iroise - CS83818   */
> /* 29238 Brest Cedex 3 - France */
> /* Tel: 0033 2 29 00 17 35 - Mobile: 0033 6 60 36 69 71*/
> /* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] */
> 
> Hernan Costante wrote:
> > Buen dia.
> > Ante todo me presento, mi nombre es Hernan soy Analista de seguridad.
> > Primariamente me gustaria saber si hay gente que hable español.
> >
> > Mas adelante les consultare sobre unos proyectos que tengo en mente.
> >
> > Saludos,
> > Hernan
> >
> > ___
> > Gnupg-users mailing list
> > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
> >
> 
> ___
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
> 
>

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: [Fwd: RE: 1er contacto]

2005-06-03 Thread Youssef Aoun
Bueno, me parece interesente.
Nunca utilise el GPG con windows.

Pero digame. Cundo un sistema de fichero se incripte con el GPG, el
sistema cambiara? Lo digo otramente: Podemos encriptir el EXT3 y el NTFS
o hay un sistema propio al GPG que se sustitue los demas cundo
empezaremos a encriptir?

Cordialemente,
Youssef Aoun

Hernan Costante wrote:
> Gracias!
> yo soy de Capital Federal, Argentina.
> 
> Les comento cual es una de mis ideas.
> Actualmente trabajo con una notebook la cual tengo en una partición
> WinXP y en otra un Debian, además de estas tengo una partición más
> grande en la cual tengo los documentos de trabajo.
> Lo que estoy intentando hacer es que la partición en donde se
> encuentran los documentos se encuentre encriptada y pueda ser accedida
> por ambos SO.
> También que la encripción y desencripción sea automática.
> 
> Se que PGP tiene esta funcionalidad pero la licencia es excesivamente cara.
> 
> Saludos,
> Hernán
> 
> 
> El 3/06/05, Youssef Aoun<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> 
>>Eso es de Juan Neufeld
>>
>> Original Message 
>>Subject: RE: 1er contacto
>>Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:06:22 -0300
>>From: Juan Neufeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: Youssef Aoun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>Hola:
>>Soy Juan Carlos Neufeld de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
>>Hoy me incorporé al gnupg-users group.
>>
>>Por favor hazle llegar mi email a "Hernan Constante", porque no figuraba
>>su email".
>>
>>Muchas gracias.
>>
>>-Mensaje original-
>>De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>En nombre de Youssef Aoun
>>Enviado el: Viernes, 03 de Junio de 2005 12:23
>>Para: Hernan Costante
>>CC: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
>>Asunto: Re: 1er contacto
>>
>>Hola,
>>Ma llamo Youssef (Jose en espanol), soy Libanes y hablo espanol.
>>Me encantare comunicar con usted en su idioma.
>>
>>Hastal luego.
>>
>>Cordialmente,
>>Youssef Aoun
>>
>>/* AOUN Youssef - 3eme annee ENST Bretagne */
>>/* Technopole Brest Iroise - CS83818   */
>>/* 29238 Brest Cedex 3 - France */
>>/* Tel: 0033 2 29 00 17 35 - Mobile: 0033 6 60 36 69 71*/
>>/* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] */
>>
>>Hernan Costante wrote:
>>
>>>Buen dia.
>>>Ante todo me presento, mi nombre es Hernan soy Analista de seguridad.
>>>Primariamente me gustaria saber si hay gente que hable español.
>>>
>>>Mas adelante les consultare sobre unos proyectos que tengo en mente.
>>>
>>>Saludos,
>>>Hernan
>>>
>>>___
>>>Gnupg-users mailing list
>>>Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
>>>http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>>>
>>
>>___
>>Gnupg-users mailing list
>>Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
>>http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>>
>>
> 
> 
> ___
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
> 

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: OpenPGP Smartcard Advantages

2005-06-03 Thread Alex L. Mauer

Jan Niehusmann wrote:


I wondered if the card couldn't just erase itself completly when the
wrong Admin-PIN is entered three times. This would at least save the
card itself, which is worth some euros. But OTOH, just locking the card
is probably easier to implement in a safe way (it's an atomic operation
which can't be aborted by just turning of power, for example).


That's a good idea.  I think you could implement it safely, by making
the card treat the "locked" status (zeroed pin retry counter?) as a flag
that it should erase itself.  Then, when it had erased itself and
verified the erasure it could reset the pin retry counter (and possibly
reset the admin PIN to default)

That way, even if you abort it by turning off power, as soon as you
apply power again the card either resumes or restarts the erasure
process (depending on which is the best combination of speed and security).

It seems to me that this is just as good as becoming permanently locked
from a security standpoint, and better from a convenience stand point
(if you forget/lose/corrupt the admin PIN, all you have to do is enter
it wrong three times.)  And in the case of a malicious host, you're
better off in that you don't have to shell out for another card.

--
Bad - You get pulled over for doing 90 in a school zone and you're drunk
off your ass again at three in the afternoon.
Worse - The cop is drunk too, and he's a mean drunk.
FUCK! - A mean drunk that's actually a swarm of semi-sentient
flesh-eating beetles.
gpg/gpg key id: 51192FF2 @ subkeys.pgp.net


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Sign my key - Was (no subject)

2005-06-03 Thread Alex L. Mauer

Francis Gulotta wrote:

How do we know it's really yours or that you are really you? I'll accept
that this message was signed with it, but by signing you key it means I
have no doubt that it really does indeed belong to Dan Mundy. And I've
nver met him.


I know this is rather controversial, but for a lot of people it doesn't
matter if the person really is Dan Mundy, since Dan Mundy is just a
string, and doesn't really have any inherent meaning attaching it to a
physical entity.

You can be *somewhat* sure that if you send an encrypted email to some
address, and they respond to its contents, that someone who has access
to that mailbox also knows the passphrase to the relevant key.

Physically meeting someone doesn't prove that the keyholder hasn't
shared the passphrase and private key.

If there's a picture UID on the key and it matches the person that you
physically meet, it doesn't prove that the person you met has the
passphrase to the key, or that they have access to the mailbox
associated with the key.

With a photo ID, it can prove (to the extent that they have proven it to
the ID issuer, i.e. not a whole lot) that the name on the key matches
the person you've physically met.  But if you interact primarily over
the net, that doesn't really matter.  There's a major missing link
between the email address and the physical person at the meeting.


For purposes of network addresses, I mostly couldn't care less if the
person who uses the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] *actually* goes
by the name, or is known to some government by the name Dan Mundy.  What
I do care about is that the same keyholder who signed this message, also
signed that one, and I have some basis for believing they both came from
the same person. And *that* is the important step.  I can build up a
level of trust based on the contents of messages signed by that key.  If
he starts spouting crap that is inconsistent with prior messages, I can
lower my trust on the determination that his key has been compromised,
or he's gone nuts, or he's changed his mind.  But what he's actually
named by his parents is totally irrelevant to that.

If I was entering into some sort of contract with him, validating the
government ID might start to matter so I could enlist some governmental
aid in enforcing it, if it became necessary.  But the more risk I'm
taking in some contract, the less likely I am to trust any middle-men to
have verified someone's identity.

--
Bad - You get pulled over for doing 90 in a school zone and you're drunk
off your ass again at three in the afternoon.
Worse - The cop is drunk too, and he's a mean drunk.
FUCK! - A mean drunk that's actually a swarm of semi-sentient
flesh-eating beetles.
gpg/gpg key id: 51192FF2 @ subkeys.pgp.net


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Corruption of KeyRing (possible WinPT related?)

2005-06-03 Thread Peter Schott
Running latest version of GPG on Windows XP.

I will sometimes start my PC and when the WinPT program launches, I have
a 0-byte pubring or secring.  I have backups, but I am a little
concerned that I could lose all of my keys due to some corruption or
improper closing of the file.

Has anyone else encountered this?  Any suggestions on things I can do to
help prevent this?

Thanks. 


Peter A. Schott
drive financial services
Database Administrator
p: 214.237.3567
c: 214.734.1792
f: 214.237.3495
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
This e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 
Sections 2510-2521. The information contained in this e-mail is confidential 
and intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the 
reader 
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent 
responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is 
strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in error or there are any 
problems 
please notify the originator immediately.  

The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is 
strictly forbidden.  This mail and any attachments have been scanned for 
viruses 
prior to leaving the Drive Financial Services network. Drive Financial Services 
will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages 
arising 
from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result 
of 
any virus being passed on. 
___


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: [Fwd: RE: 1er contacto]

2005-06-03 Thread Santiago José López Borrazás
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

El 03/06/05 19:35, Youssef Aoun escribió:

> Bueno, me parece interesente.
> Nunca utilise el GPG con windows.

Yo lo utilizo desde que utilicé el PGP desde el año 1.999..así que...mira.

> Pero digame. Cundo un sistema de fichero se incripte con el GPG, el
> sistema cambiara? Lo digo otramente: Podemos encriptir el EXT3 y el NTFS
> o hay un sistema propio al GPG que se sustitue los demas cundo
> empezaremos a encriptir?

En un principio, no. El sistema operativo Linux tiene un sistema de
encriptación aparte al GnuPG(no recuerdo cuál es el modo para la
encriptación del mismo, pero posiblemente sea con el GnuPG como tú mismo
mencionas).

- --
Slds...
ICQ #117844560 Santiago José López Borrazás(Milon) Miembro del Grupo A.H.E.
Linux User: #206958 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key Public: 0xFD913988 0xD522C952

- --
Slds de Santiago José López Borrazás. Admin de hackindex.com
Conocimientos avanzados en seguridad informática.
Conocimientos avanzados en redes pequeñas y grandes.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2rc1 (GNU/Linux)
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=H3DY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: [Fwd: RE: 1er contacto]

2005-06-03 Thread Santiago José López Borrazás
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

El 03/06/05 19:21, Hernan Costante escribió:

Jau:

> Gracias!

;-))

> yo soy de Capital Federal, Argentina.

Yo soy de España. Concretamente del Noroeste de España(Galicia).

> Les comento cual es una de mis ideas.

A ver... :)

> Actualmente trabajo con una notebook la cual tengo en una partición
> WinXP y en otra un Debian, además de estas tengo una partición más
> grande en la cual tengo los documentos de trabajo. Lo que estoy
> intentando hacer es que la partición en donde se encuentran los
> documentos se encuentre encriptada y pueda ser accedida por ambos SO.
> También que la encripción y desencripción sea automática.

De todo eso, no hay ningún problema, todo sistema operativo puede ser
posible y susceptible para no tener problemas genéricos a la hora de
encriptar cualquier documento en una partición que se quiera(o incluso, si
cabe más...pues guardarlo en un CD o DVD).

> Se que PGP tiene esta funcionalidad pero la licencia es excesivamente 
> cara.

No creo...GnuPG y PGP(en la versión Freeware), se pueden encriptar los
ficheros y documentos generales SIN NINGÚN TIPO de limitación. Yo no veo el
problema...

- --
Slds de Santiago José López Borrazás. Admin de hackindex.com
Conocimientos avanzados en seguridad informática.
Conocimientos avanzados en redes pequeñas y grandes.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2rc1 (GNU/Linux)
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=wyXI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Sign my key - Was (no subject)

2005-06-03 Thread Dan Mundy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Well I'm glad someone out there saw that message...  Anyway I see your
point about user identity.  About those keysigning parties, I see you
guys are nerds!  Don't worry, so am I... Anyway, you can /choose/ to
sign my key, but you don't really have to (obviously).
Also, i think i'm finally beginning to understand mailing lists...

Dan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCoLz8TbbnG4BhqDARAm2yAKDLv73GdPCd5P5KF3I7bcHzglBuLgCeIx+9
b0TM1vTn+EStx9t/wBqZvHI=
=mEjj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Sign my key - Was (no subject)

2005-06-03 Thread Dan Mundy

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Well, I'm glad someone out there saw that message... anyway, now
I've got the hang of these mailing lists!
Alright, I understand that nobody really knows I'm Dan Mundy.
But about key signing parties, you guys really are nerds! Oh
well, I guess I am one too... Anyway, I've been spreading the
word about gnupg, and hopefully some of my friends will get a
key.  In fact, I think by the end of the weekend, we will have a
new guy, so to speak...  Hope he joins this mailing list!

Dan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.44

iD8DBQFCoLJLTbbnG4BhqDARAg/DAKCDtq8YrX3zAly9qei5UidrhN7XJQCgmJVY
CbAK3PB5GrIkT//iqGIlB4w=
=V6WX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Mailing List Chaos!!! HELP!!

2005-06-03 Thread Dan Mundy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I am very confused as to how to reply to a message and make it display
as an indented response, for example, responses to the topic "Pref" at
the beginning of the month.

how do i do what David Shaw did? is it something with the subject
line, like "Re:"? HELP!!

thanks,

Dan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCoL/nTbbnG4BhqDARAmCsAKCSxGqWxI25nF6Bd+pADqHPiSAoJACfeBd+
LS7F9vFON4QXyNSwAS1aaEY=
=p5u/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: 1er contacto

2005-06-03 Thread Hernan Costante
Muchas gracias,
ya envie un mail explicando brevemente una de mis ideas.
**
yo soy de Capital Federal, Argentina.

Les comento cual es una de mis ideas.
Actualmente trabajo con una notebook la cual tengo en una partición
WinXP y en otra un Debian, además de estas tengo una partición más
grande en la cual tengo los documentos de trabajo.
Lo que estoy intentando hacer es que la partición en donde se
encuentran los documentos se encuentre encriptada y pueda ser accedida
por ambos SO.
También que la encripción y desencripción sea automática.

Se que PGP tiene esta funcionalidad pero la licencia es excesivamente cara.
**

Saludos!

El 3/06/05, Erpo<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 14:43 +0200, Hernan Costante wrote:
> > Buen dia.
> > Ante todo me presento, mi nombre es Hernan soy Analista de seguridad.
> > Primariamente me gustaria saber si hay gente que hable español.
> >
> > Mas adelante les consultare sobre unos proyectos que tengo en mente.
> >
> > Saludos,
> > Hernan
> 
> Hola Hernan! Me llamo Eric y he tomado clases de español pero no tengo
> mucha experiencia en realidad. Inglés es mi primera idioma.
> 
> Me gustaría practicar y especialmente aprender mas palabras que tienen
> que ver con seguridad y computadoras. Entonces, si puedo ayudarle con
> algo, pregunte!
> 
> Eric
> 
> 
> ___
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: 1er contacto

2005-06-03 Thread Erpo
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 14:43 +0200, Hernan Costante wrote:
> Buen dia.
> Ante todo me presento, mi nombre es Hernan soy Analista de seguridad.
> Primariamente me gustaria saber si hay gente que hable español.
> 
> Mas adelante les consultare sobre unos proyectos que tengo en mente.
> 
> Saludos,
> Hernan

Hola Hernan! Me llamo Eric y he tomado clases de español pero no tengo
mucha experiencia en realidad. Inglés es mi primera idioma.

Me gustaría practicar y especialmente aprender mas palabras que tienen
que ver con seguridad y computadoras. Entonces, si puedo ayudarle con
algo, pregunte!


Eric



___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Sign my key - Was (no subject)

2005-06-03 Thread Martin Geisler
Francis Gulotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I'd give you some links off hand (if I had any on hand) for how to
> find any keysigning parties [...]

Such as http://www.biglumber.com/ for example.

-- 
Martin Geisler GnuPG Key: 0x7E45DD38

PHP EXIF Library  |  PHP Weather |  PHP Shell
http://pel.sf.net/|  http://phpweather.net/  |  http://mgeisler.net/
Read/write EXIF data  |  Show current weather|  A shell in a browser


pgppbzE2hXwTF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: [Fwd: RE: 1er contacto]

2005-06-03 Thread Erpo
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 19:21 +0200, Hernan Costante wrote:
> Gracias!
> yo soy de Capital Federal, Argentina.
> 
> Les comento cual es una de mis ideas.
> Actualmente trabajo con una notebook la cual tengo en una partición
> WinXP y en otra un Debian, además de estas tengo una partición más
> grande en la cual tengo los documentos de trabajo.
> Lo que estoy intentando hacer es que la partición en donde se
> encuentran los documentos se encuentre encriptada y pueda ser accedida
> por ambos SO.
> También que la encripción y desencripción sea automática.
> 
> Se que PGP tiene esta funcionalidad pero la licencia es excesivamente cara.
> 
> Saludos,
> Hernán

Si le entiendo, lo que usted quiere no está fácil hacer. La problema
está que los documentors pueda ser accedida por ambos SO.

Si su notebook tuviera solamente WinXP, pueda usar el sistema de fichero
"NTFS". Con NTFS pueda mantener ficheros encriptados. Si su notebook
tuviera solamente Linux, pueda usar "DM-Crypt" debajo de su sistema de
fichero (por ejemplo EXT3 o ReiserFS). Con eso, todo del sistema está
encriptado incluyendo los nombres y fechas de creación de los archivos.

Pero Linux no puede escribir NTFS y WinXP no puede usar EXT3 ni
DM-Crypt.

Personas quien quieren guardar archivos accedida por ambos SO a menudo
usan el sistema FAT32, pero eso no puede hacer encripción automática.

Entonces no sé como resolver esta problema fácilmente. :( 

Si usted desea documentos encriptados, es posible que usted tendrá que
cifrar cada uno con GPG cada tiempo desearía usarlo.


Eric




___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Help on Enigmail - Mozilla 1.7.7. with Win XPP

2005-06-03 Thread Dan Mundy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

> Dear Dan
>
> Thanks for those answers. Thanks to help from this group, PGPNET
> and PGP-basics on yahoo groups, I've progressed further
>
> Should I have other questions, I shall post them here
>
> Thanks again
>
> Subu



You're very welcome, Subu.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCoMkWTbbnG4BhqDARAmttAKC2x13oOK1n2bEWp1KjWdljFTrJyQCgmwG9
IXzEDpoHLsZ4q/lWleHOLWU=
=boBM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


cross-OS transparent encryption

2005-06-03 Thread Erpo
The spanish thread on the list right now is revolving around the problem
of sharing encrypted data between WinXP and Linux. The original poster
wants to share a read/write partition between the two OSs on a laptop
and have transparent encryption of the files on that partition. 

I said that NTFS will do this (windows only) as well as dm-crypt (linux
only), but I'm stumped as far as cross-platform solutions with
compatible on-disk formats. The only suggestion I could offer was to use
FAT32 and manually encrypt and decrypt the files before using them
(yuck). Any non-spanish-speakers have suggestions?


Eric


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Mailing List Chaos!!! HELP!!

2005-06-03 Thread Dan Mundy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Sean C. C. wrote:

> Dan, When you click on the reply button it should automatically add
> the "Re: " to the Subject.
>
> Dan Mundy said the following on 6/3/2005 4:39 PM:
>

> I am very confused as to how to reply to a message and make it
> display as an indented response, for example, responses to the
> topic "Pref" at the beginning of the month.
>
> how do i do what David Shaw did? is it something with the subject
> line, like "Re:"? HELP!!
>
> thanks,
>
> Dan

>>
>>
just testing different lines in my email program, please excuse 2 more
of these messages!! thanks
Dan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCoNy3TbbnG4BhqDARAgOoAJ9ZWHOUVC8rxqEXM+fJ4ctgJuLGIACgkshE
Attk/KoDTKgM0Kusl24cBdg=
=SYzb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Mailing List Chaos!!! HELP!!

2005-06-03 Thread Dan Mundy
here's just 1 more test of what i can posibly do!! please excuse me!

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


GnuPG Clearsign vs. PGP/MIME Signing

2005-06-03 Thread Dan Mundy
hey all,

i was wondering what the differences between conventional gpg
clearsigning and pgp/mime signing are.  which one's better for what?
which should i use more often? please help me!

thanks all,

Dan



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


[Fwd: Re: GnuPG Clearsign vs. PGP/MIME Signing]

2005-06-03 Thread Dan Mundy

--- Begin Message ---
I'm wondering which kind of signing you did on this mail?

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Mundy
> Sent: Samstag, 4. Juni 2005 02:31
> To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> Subject: GnuPG Clearsign vs. PGP/MIME Signing
> 
> 
> hey all,
> 
> i was wondering what the differences between conventional gpg 
> clearsigning and pgp/mime signing are.  which one's better 
> for what? which should i use more often? please help me!
> 
> thanks all,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 


--- End Message ---
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Set date for signature to expire

2005-06-03 Thread Per Tunedal Casual

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,
I want to sign keys with signatures having a limited life time. Can I set
an expiration date when I sign a key?

I often get a question if I want my signature to expire when the key
expires, so far so good. I want to set a date of my own will.

Per Tunedal
Keyid: 0xAE053BE0
Fingerprint: D70D 9057 A985 4944 2191 995A 2D74 F09D AE05 3BE0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.959
Comment: Vad är en PGP-signatur? www.clipanish.com/PGP/pgp.html

iD8DBQFCoRIDpPsTvNtsBX8RAlJ3AKCAatzYbH9rtqXzgTDL4wqIqsV1ZgCfT7Tf
j5bKKEfwRZE2e1e3PhE5uNo=
=jz/n
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Set date for signature to expire

2005-06-03 Thread David Shaw
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 04:28:56AM +0200, Per Tunedal Casual wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to sign keys with signatures having a limited life time. Can I set
> an expiration date when I sign a key?
> 
> I often get a question if I want my signature to expire when the key
> expires, so far so good. I want to set a date of my own will.

Set ask-cert-expire in yout gpg.conf or on the command line and you'll
be asked when the key signature should expire.

David

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users