Re: deluid // why no passphrase required ?

2005-08-11 Thread Werner Koch
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:32:33 +0200 (MET DST), Johan Wevers said:

 Are uid's also stored in the secret key? I thought they only existed

For historic reasons the user IDs are also stored in the secring.gpg.
This is an internal detail and will eventually change.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Proof of email ownership

2005-08-11 Thread Marco d'Itri
How does this interact with DKIM?

-- 
ciao,
Marco

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: [outlgpg] Outlook 2003 problems

2005-08-11 Thread Richard Sperry
The setting for cached mode can cause bandwidth
problems on the network. you may be in violation of
your IT policy by implememting this.  Some companies
have terminated users for such actions.  It also can
pose a security threat as the raise in bandwidth, if
by many users, could over load their IDS/IPS sniffers.
 

--- R. Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Richard Sperry wrote:
  The issue you have is caused from the newer
 version of
  GnuPG.  Timo is doing a great job of writing a
 newer
  version, but with all new releases it takes time
 to
  find the bugs. 
  
  for a working beta of my Ol03 installer goto
  http://www.sperryservices.com/gnutools.htm
  
  The installer takes care of some of the OL issues
 and
  uses the .94 plug-in for stability. 
  
  It also has Winpt for keymanager, GnuPG 1.4.2 and
  GpgEE .  I have tried to write it stupid friendly
 so
  everything is set in theroy.  For security reasons
  I
  set the keys and conf into the userdocs. I
 recomend
  using EFS if you are on XP Pro.  
  
  I would like any feedback you have.
  
  --Richard Sperry
  
 I looked at the page you mentioned and was curious
 about:
 
Please note that if you are connected to a
 Corperate Network
or Exchange server, you MUST contact your IT or
 ADMIN before
installing!
 
 Is this a licensing issue?
 My Outlook 2003 is connected to my employer's
 Exchange server.
 That's the only reason I even use Outlook.  :-)
 
 Richard.
  ___
 Gnupg-users mailing list
 Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
 http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
 


Richard Sperry 
Sperry Services 
Where your total cost is our bottom line!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: [outlgpg] Outlook 2003 problems

2005-08-11 Thread Timo Schulz
On Wed Aug 10 2005; 17:06, R. Jensen wrote:

 and installed it. Now, in the explorer windows the dll does
 show up a 0.99.4, but the tab in Outlook says 0.99.3.

This is an error in the code. We already fixed it.


 Save options in the registry. When I start Outlook, I
 get one that initially says Access is denied and then

Another user told me about similar problems, currently the plugin
assumes you have enough privileges to write to the registry. This
could be also the problem with the crash.



 Debugger drstsn32 -p %ld -e %ld -g
 (and a PreVisualStudio7Debugger with the same value)
 
 So, it looks like Dr. Watson is enabled, but isn't getting invoked?

As I said, I use special debugging programs. But I will see what I can
do to find it out.


Timo

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: [outlgpg] Outlook 2003 problems

2005-08-11 Thread Timo Schulz
On Wed Aug 10 2005; 13:30, R. Jensen wrote:

 and Enigmail (0.92.0.0). I signed the email there, but sent it
 to the Windows XP Pro box where I'm running Outlook 2003.
 
 On the Windows box I'm running GPG 1.41.

This is weird, I use GPG 1.4.2 and I have no problems. We definitely
need to check this. Maybe you can upgrade to 1.4.2?


Timo

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: [outlgpg] Outlook 2003 problems

2005-08-11 Thread Patrick Dickey
Timo Schulz wrote:

On Wed Aug 10 2005; 17:06, R. Jensen wrote:

  

and installed it. Now, in the explorer windows the dll does
show up a 0.99.4, but the tab in Outlook says 0.99.3.



This is an error in the code. We already fixed it.


  

Save options in the registry. When I start Outlook, I
get one that initially says Access is denied and then



Another user told me about similar problems, currently the plugin
assumes you have enough privileges to write to the registry. This
could be also the problem with the crash.



  

Debugger drstsn32 -p %ld -e %ld -g
(and a PreVisualStudio7Debugger with the same value)

So, it looks like Dr. Watson is enabled, but isn't getting invoked?



As I said, I use special debugging programs. But I will see what I can
do to find it out.


Timo

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

  

I believe also (and it's been a while since I've seen the crash report)
when you get the message, there is a link to show the details of the
message.  What he can possibly do there is click inside of the details
box, and select everything in there.  Then hit CTRL-V (Copy) and then
Paste it to either a post here, or notepad.  That should get everything
that you need, since I believe also that part of the details are the Dr.
Watson report.

Patrick.


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: [outlgpg] Outlook 2003 problems

2005-08-11 Thread Plan9
Where I live it was 8/11/2005 4:57 AM, when Timo Schulz wrote:

useful to have the debug output of Dr. Watson. Please compress it
before you send it because it's very large. You can either send these
reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or to me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) directly.

How do I enable this?
 
 I thought Windows offers it by default. When it crashes you have some
 choices and one of them should be like Details. Sorry, but my machine
 has special debugging hooks and thus I don't know how the original
 dialogs look like.

The following two Microsoft support links may be helpful:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;308538
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;188296

-- 
 Regards, Ben


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Access experimental subpackets of 'User Attribute Packet'

2005-08-11 Thread David Srbecky

Hello,

I have payed with the idea of using experimental subpackets of 'User 
Attribute Packet' and here is what I came up with:


Named Attribute Subpacket (type 100)
--
Subpacket specific data:
   magic identification number
   datatype - identifier - eg. 4 - UTF8 string
   name - UTF8 string - eg. ICQ#
   data - depends on datatype - eg. 123-456-789

NB: size of data can be calculated from size of subpacket (it is just 
the remaining data)


Datatypes:
   0 - reserved
   1 - no data (it is just named flag)
   2 - boolean
   3 - integer
   4 - UTF8 string
   5 - URL
   6 - image
   7 - binary
   8 - binary file
   100-110 - private or experimental use

NB: Binary type holds just some unspecified binary data. On the other 
hand, binary file type holds file that can be saved to disk and the name 
of the attribute represents its filename.


In my humble opinion this is the most important attribute of all. This 
attribute is supposed to be used for any user specific or program 
specific data. It is similar to the mail X- headers - it allows users to 
store identifiable information, which is not suitable for 
standardization or is not standardized yet.



vCard Subpacket (type 102)
--
Subpacket specific data:
   magic identification number
   data - content of the vCard file

You can store you name, email and Photo ID in your public key, but what 
about other information? I suggest to add 'vCard Subpacket' because 
vCard is already known and supported format in MUAs and so the cost of 
implementing this should be minimal.



Property Subpacket (type 103)
-
Subpacket specific data:
   magic identification number
   id - identifier - eg. 1
   data - depends on id - eg. true

There are a lot of little attributes which we may want to store in this 
subpacket. For example:


1 - public key url
2 - prefers signed mail
3 - prefers encrypted mail
4 - preferred format
5 - supports MIME format
6 - supports inline format
etc...

'Property Subpacket' does not really describe the purpose of the 
subpacket, but I could not find any better name. Any suggestions?






It there any way I can use GnuPG to store and load this information?


Regards,
David Srbecky

Reference:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-14.txt

 5.12. User Attribute Packet (Tag 17)

 The User Attribute packet is a variation of the User ID packet.  It
 is capable of storing more types of data than the User ID packet
 which is limited to text.  Like the User ID packet, a User Attribute
 packet may be certified by the key owner (self-signed) or any
 other key owner who cares to certify it.  Except as noted, a User
 Attribute packet may be used anywhere that a User ID packet may be
 used.

 While User Attribute packets are not a required part of the OpenPGP
 standard, implementations SHOULD provide at least enough
 compatibility to properly handle a certification signature on the
 User Attribute packet.  A simple way to do this is by treating the
 User Attribute packet as a User ID packet with opaque contents, but
 an implementation may use any method desired.

 The User Attribute packet is made up of one or more attribute
 subpackets.  Each subpacket consists of a subpacket header and a
 body. The header consists of:

   - the subpacket length (1, 2, or 5 octets)

   - the subpacket type (1 octet)

 and is followed by the subpacket specific data.

 The only currently defined subpacket type is 1, signifying an image.
 An implementation SHOULD ignore any subpacket of a type that it does
 not recognize.  Subpacket types 100 through 110 are reserved for
 private or experimental use.


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


RE: [outlgpg] Outlook 2003 problems

2005-08-11 Thread Timo Schulz
You wrote:

 running Outlook 2003 SP1. Re-registering the plugin doesn't resolve
 the problem either.  Would any log files, screen prints, etc help?  If
 so, please specify and I will be glad to send them on.

No, the logging code is not complete yet. As I said, the most
valuable information is the output of Dr. Watson or a similar
'debugger' because it contain information at what place the crash
happened.


Timo



___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: [outlgpg] Outlook 2003 problems

2005-08-11 Thread R. Jensen
Timo Schulz wrote:
 
 The primary site for downloads is ftp.g10code.com/pub/outlgpg.
 

When I connect to ftp.g10code.com, there is no pub directory.
[I'm doing anonymous FTP with WS_FTP].
There is a g10code directory and in there is an outlgpg directory.
I got the zip of the 0.99.4 version dated July 27, 2005.

As to permissions, I checked and I'm in the administrators group
on my machine--I can't think what other permissions I'd need. :-)

I upgraded to 1.4.2 from 1.4.1 and the behavior is the same.

As to copying the data that shows up as part of Microsoft's error
reporting. The text is not selectable.

So, I don't see any path going forward that will help resolve the
problem on my system:
  Dr. Watson doesn't seem to get invoked, just Microsoft's
 Error reporting.
  I can't copy Microsoft's report content.


Just to summarize:

Hardware: Dell OPTIPLEX GX270: Dual Pentium 4 (2.8G Hz)
   2 GB RAM

OS: Windows XP Professional, Service Pack 2
(Build 2600.xpsp_sp2_gdr.050301-1519 : Service Pack 2)
Outlook: Microsoft Office Outlook 2003 (11.6359.6408) SP1
 [Installed from Microsoft Office Standard Edition 2003]

GPG Location: C:\Program Files\Gnu\GnuPG\gpg.exe
Vrsion: 1.4.2
Home: C:/Documents and Settings/rjensen.AMERICAS/Application Data/GnuPG
(from gpg --version)

GPGExch info:
   libgpgmedlgs.dll: 0.6.1.0 copied to C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32
   GPGExch.dll:  0.99.4.0 installed in C:\gnupg\GPGExch
  [I ran regsvr32 on GPGExch.dll from a command prompt in
   C:\gnupg\GPGExch]

Summary of behavior problems:
   When Outlook is started, I get several dialog boxes relating
   to storing values in the registry. The first one says access
   denied. The other 5 indicate the operation completed successfully.

   Preferences changed on the GnuPG tab do not survive a program
   restart. Changing the preferences also causes the 5 dialog
   boxes to appear.

   When changing preferences,
the Also encrypt message with the default key starts off
with the value:
C:\Documents and Settings\rjensen.AMERICAS\Application Data\gnupg
If I attempt to save changes I get an error dialog:
The default key cannot contain any spaces.
I have to clear out the box and uncheck to save other changes.

Attempting to verify a signature results in a dialog:
Invalid crypto engine

Attempting to sign a message causes Outlook to 'close'.
After composing a plain text message I click on 'Send'.
I do not get a prompt for my passphrase.
I just get the dialog about:
  Microsoft Office Outlook has encountered a problem
   and needs to close

Error 'signature':
  AppName:  outlook.exe   AppVer: 11.0.6353.0  AppStamp: 408f2937
  ModName: libgpgmedlgs.dll  ModVer: 0.6.1.0   ModStamp: 42e0c70e
  fDebug: 0   Offset: 5f77

If I look at the error report contents, I can't copy and paste,
but here are some more details:

Exception Information
  Code: 0xc005 Flags: 0x
Record: 0x  Address: 0x002235f77

Then there are a large number of 'Modules' listed.
GPGExch.dll is module 63 and libgpgmedlgs.dll is module 64.

GPGExch.dll
Image Base: 0x0208   Image Size: 0x
Checksum:   0x   Time Stamp: 0x42dfcf77
Version Information:
 Signature:  feef04bd
 StrucVer:   0001
 FileVer:(0.99:4.0)
 ProdVer:(0.99:4.0)
 FlagMask:   003f
 Flags:  
 OS: 0004
 FileType:   0002
 SubType:
 FileDate:   :

libgpgmedlgs.dll
Image Base: 0x0223   Image Size: 0x
Checksum:   0x   Time Stamp: 0x42e0c70e
Version Information:
 Signature:  feef04bd
 StrucVer:   0001
 FileVer:(0.6:1.0)
 ProdVer:(0.6:1.0)
 FlagMask:   003f
 Flags:  0020
 OS: 00040004
 FileType:   0001
 SubType:
 FileDate:   :

After all the modules, there is information about different threads,
but without being able to copy the contents, I don't know what
information would be helpful.

I'll be glad to try the next version, but I don't see there
is anything more I can do with this one.

Richard.


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


zero-length MPIs (was: Re: mpi error with check-trustdb in 1.4.2 - resolved)

2005-08-11 Thread Jason Harris
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:02:17PM -0400, Jason Harris wrote:
 On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:30:09PM -0500, John Clizbe wrote:
 
  Tracked down the two offending keys and deleted them with 1.4.1. They both
  failed to import from a keyserver with 1.4.2 with the same mpi error, so I'm
  marking it off to key cruft.

Here are some more offending keys:

  0xA0B3E88B
  0xFC05DA69
  0x0FCF6738
  0xCC78C893
  0x98FDE37C
  0x74C9DE33
  0x57023F00 - corrupt subkey

Fetching them from keyserver.kjsl.com is now possible with gnupg-1.4.2.
To patch pks, add this to the middle of decode_mpi() (in pgputil.c):

  /* skip packets with 0-length MPIs for GPG's benefit (gnupg-1.4.2) */
  if (mpi-nbits == 0) {
return (0);
  }

-- 
Jason Harris   |  NIC:  JH329, PGP:  This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] _|_ web:  http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/
  Got photons?   (TM), (C) 2004


pgpXeuUVhq6vB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: [outlgpg] Outlook 2003 problems

2005-08-11 Thread Timo Schulz
On Thu Aug 11 2005; 12:29, R. Jensen wrote:

 As to permissions, I checked and I'm in the administrators group
 on my machine--I can't think what other permissions I'd need. :-)

Then it's propably a bug. But I never got such a message so it is
propably a combination of some 'events'.

 
   Dr. Watson doesn't seem to get invoked, just Microsoft's
  Error reporting.
   I can't copy Microsoft's report content.

I'm not sure about the details they present. Useful would be a
'stack backtrace'. But I'm not sure how they call it and if they
provide it at all.


 After all the modules, there is information about different threads,
 but without being able to copy the contents, I don't know what
 information would be helpful.

I guess this is the information I need. And something like CTRL+A
CTRL+C does not work?


 I'll be glad to try the next version, but I don't see there
 is anything more I can do with this one.

You already did a lot, thanks.


Timo

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: [outlgpg] Outlook 2003 problems

2005-08-11 Thread Samuel ]slund
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:29:01PM -0500, R. Jensen wrote:
 
 As to copying the data that shows up as part of Microsoft's error
 reporting. The text is not selectable.
 
 So, I don't see any path going forward that will help resolve the
 problem on my system:
   Dr. Watson doesn't seem to get invoked, just Microsoft's
  Error reporting.
   I can't copy Microsoft's report content.

Did you try Alt+Print Screen ? 
That usually takes a screenshot of the curently active window.

HTH
//Samuel


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


tracing the Web of Trust?

2005-08-11 Thread Michael W. Lucas
Hi folks,

I'm trying to learn if there's a tool to trace the web of trust
between two keys.

For example, suppose I get an email from someone I've never heard of
and want to learn if there is any valid chain of signatures leading
from me to him.

I imagine that this is a difficult problem.  :-)  Has anyone solved it
for Joe Average user?

Thanks,
==ml

-- 
Michael W. Lucas[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.BlackHelicopters.org/~mwlucas/

The cloak of anonymity protects me from the nuisance of caring. -Non Sequitur

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: tracing the Web of Trust?

2005-08-11 Thread Michael Daigle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

In reply to Michael W. Lucas's message sent 2005-08-11 20:42:

 I'm trying to learn if there's a tool to trace the web of trust 
 between two keys.
 
 For example, suppose I get an email from someone I've never heard of 
 and want to learn if there is any valid chain of signatures leading 
 from me to him.
 
 I imagine that this is a difficult problem.  :-)  Has anyone solved
 it for Joe Average user?

Jason Harris provided useful links. An end-user might take advantage of
path tracing as in my public key page,
http://www.mikedaigle.ca/keys/index.htm


- --
Mike Daigle   http://www.mikedaigle.ca
My PGP Key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust  http://www.gswot.org

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: GSWoT - Gossamer Spider Web of Trust - www.gswot.org

iD8DBQFC/CLaNuccKlqTLlMRA5gzAJ9xwb2bRztemuk1517DWFyPzB8pKgCdEGrl
ZpJDJuQcJ2uiZjQc2B5gb7A=
=nmCS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users