Re: GPL components in libgcrypt 1.4.1
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 11:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > But, it seems following files are also under GPL. > ./src/dumpsexp.c > ./tests/random.c > ./tests/prime.c > ./tests/ac-schemes.c Right. But where is your problem? These are parts of the regresion test suite or independent helper utilities. They are not part of the libgcrypt shared library. > I was also unable to make/compile the libgcrypt > without these 4 files. Given that you need to to distribute the source code and build system anyway, I fail to see why you want to exclude them. Just distribute the entire libcgrypt package with or witout your modification. Let me also note that you need to allow anyone to change the LGPL code and allow them to use this changed code with your possible proprietary application. For practical reasons this means that your applications needs to use libgcrypt as shared library. Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Linux-Kongress 2008 + Hamburg + October 7-10 + www.linux-kongress.org Die Gedanken sind frei. Auschnahme regelt ein Bundeschgesetz. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Has anybody installed SP3 for XP?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Well, my windows wants me to install SP3, and before doing that, I would like to know if there is any known problem with GPG due to SP3. It would not be the first time an SP breaks something... and I don't want to break GPG. Best Regards -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJIv8qbAAoJEMV4f6PvczxARGUIAKzykVrt2xqA0NdAaT8Gv5eE 5eBJIHg1962YPc7couiM43iHhFjt43RKWwu9HCqf8Jro3AehMDymCUc7UqT7lv/6 6jPj1FKnyiA3OM7DJsKYpIPtB+YRI4hHil83E7vGwRIwZfFttaUFgmzRpLUrKjUD iHsiyJtKqt5hxOwoc4GbsBm3CmYgh/j10medkXbIbwAt83ZNYSbDysVXQkyW1v7W IW/17bANTCL/DDx9anxzNtYjbUjfhPLsWcL7A/qPcGlvPoY1ZWQ08uqHkVdh9avP QsGxKmpdHlPt53Yz8/Q9oVoFWOsCOHtp05zpbBy8upIzm32xajUTomBxaaqKX2M= =DcIv -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Has anybody installed SP3 for XP?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Faramir wrote: > Well, my windows wants me to install SP3, and before doing that, I would > like to know if there is any known problem with GPG due to SP3. It would > not be the first time an SP breaks something... and I don't want to > break GPG. I have experienced _no_ issues with regards to SP3. JOHN ;) Timestamp: Thursday 04 Sep 2008, 08:19 --400 (Eastern Daylight Time) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10-svn4818: (MingW32) Comment: Public Key at: http://tinyurl.com/8cpho Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: https://www.gswot.org Comment: Homepage: http://tinyurl.com/yzhbhx iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJIv9JTAAoJEBCGy9eAtCsPMzsIAKSr+2ReiJfhT7YRDAJKUtTI Di69s5y5lPlgQgmWvOQlZh5JbGy/0vJgu52fc7YLzz9moNWe4rmq1fr2dy+VgXnM ClTZ62ApILMMad97X0bOUQb4CpdNHxXUO8xw28wFng5pFd80NQBfhnjsgEueEbtV OlBy2nvRjRtae7hGX6DfNvSuGvOTy9/c8ibElDtJ0PsgAB8oVcco9Z5v2X40/Por 7SG+PssmLhkx9eMBUuDi27LDbZkHWSCOogoTEXenzwIZAl7ryDp1fejYuy4evaVX t8mK2fkhZ2uW+Q+XO9YgZ5rSFfY9ENcxWUPX4XcvYUaO/voDmSsZ+nUbTz1rD3c= =BMZ8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Has anybody installed SP3 for XP?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 John W. Moore III escribió: > Faramir wrote: >> Well, my windows wants me to install SP3, and before doing that, I would >> like to know if there is any known problem with GPG due to SP3. It would >> not be the first time an SP breaks something... and I don't want to >> break GPG. > > I have experienced _no_ issues with regards to SP3. Excellent! I think I will check at hamachi forum, and proceed... Thanks for your answer Best Regards -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJIv+lsAAoJEMV4f6PvczxAA8YH/2IlfRJGeVF3yjoRLj/2yntO 1rnszaGDlvBDXsztYvz6keh9FAhvx/9V9fAyf0aUnhhrbYXxBM1V4yifF0mJhXBB mTpZTje11W67xkom1FjiT71rG9KSUK/LqPY3Xl76AsPsSTjhXIdetlObpE01Fu0O 5u8N3n5a+uvxiwQdHVtr2tRnBXrLKg08ArgiM09TWX9vCURxO27JGqwt4Qrtamp/ ta8Z+d4/MNWtkhLiZTG+AadjEVg1J9BaGcsxsI9tcfj4iLuCLoT+nw2+pyhJEJRe lk1bur/yWpkadvyMmvuUz1w4vVa1VcQKsvHSWGIU4Ki969qtgVGv/K8qgHlAc5w= =p2h4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: CERT fails with LDAP URL
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 04:31:01PM -0400, Alex wrote: > Hi, when I try to locate a key with CERT it fails with this message: > > $ gpg2 --auto-key-locate cert -r [EMAIL PROTECTED] --encrypt > gpgkeys: key not found on keyserver > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found. > gpg: Total number processed: 0 > gpg: automatically retrieved [EMAIL PROTECTED]' via DNS CERT > gpg: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: skipped: No public key > gpg: [stdin]: encryption failed: No public key > > $ gpg2 --version > gpg (GnuPG) 2.0.9 > [...] > Used libraries: gcrypt(1.4.1) > > > I generated the CERT record using the make-dns-cert tool and set the > url to "ldap://keyserver.pgp.com";. My key is definitely listed on the > keyserver, and GPG is correctly connecting to the keyserver using ldap. > It seems that gpg is asking the ldap server for the wrong key (all 0's) > I checked the RR with `host' and it is indeed correct. (Alex sent me the necessary information to diagnose this off-list) This is actually working correctly. CERT is not intended to pass a keyserver address (like ldap://keyserver.pgp.com), but rather a complete URL to the key (like http://www.jabberwocky.com/key.asc). That said, I don't see any harm in accepting a keyserver address in a CERT in addition to full URLs. I'll change the code to permit that in the future. David ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Automate decryption
Hi This question pops up from time to time. I have written a blog post on this: http://blog.hardeep.name/computer/20080904/auto-gpg/ I havent added details on how to secure the passphrase and key file - but maybe I can do that. Please send in comments - better if you post them on the blog itself. Regards Hardeep On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Robert J. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Duwaine Robinson wrote: >> I want to automate decryption with GnuPG and I am not sure how is the >> best way to go about handling the passphrase. Anybody have any ideas, >> suggestions or any failed attempts to speak of? > > It's fairly easy to automate things with Perl. Biggest concern will be > keeping the file unreadable by other users, though, since your > passphrase will be in the file. > > > > ___ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users > -- Hardeep Singh http://blog.Hardeep.name ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Has anybody installed SP3 for XP?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 There has bee no problem with the Hamachi and SP3. However, there has been some known problems with AMD chipsets and SP3. On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Faramir wrote: > Excellent! I think I will check at hamachi forum, and proceed... -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: http://getfiregpg.org iD8DBQFIwCsVBii+WJwtK7YRAnSdAJwNH9iOl5eUVL12Jgo1kUYVUE/69ACgmAzo dH8wgvzOqJqYYb1YEQ5q9LE= =qhks -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Has anybody installed SP3 for XP?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Allen Schultz escribió: > There has bee no problem with the Hamachi and SP3. However, there has > been some known problems with AMD chipsets and SP3. Holy chipsets, Batman! Too bad I already installed it... I hope my nforce chipset survives the upgrade... Thanks, I will be on guard... Best Regards -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJIwDdAAAoJEMV4f6PvczxAi7MH/j5RQOwLiNb9lC64NPkVGeP1 wm7ipCTA6dWDnnib9NQDtD+SQFAQ2AD893CAjY15pr/1QmorWpa9R+Ygi86tfkrn 46iaz9EpSefBYyndHQ4x1j9be18wcCXrzwNq/Bi1iD84DUSVtm0VqrqfxWlegsWE sPyUxHLFOxJGQcAOoRblsWTOdYjHE1jZwpdt3EMlLsH76QTEY3oTaR+ONzKluazZ A6SUKMIX+tDPZhvAsASADdinhfLO6FAphsh7ef8f4+WJu0nBF2+7JAd1dASkygrd S9Tz0NdirOszKdXzUGPMWaTFXVwxnrsQ3Cll+5Jh7YuI6i8neU9nxjLzeQGUBOw= =w8qd -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Has anybody installed SP3 for XP?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Allen Schultz wrote: > There has bee no problem with the Hamachi and SP3. However, there has > been some known problems with AMD chipsets and SP3. This 'problem' affected only HP/Compaq PC's that haven't had the BIOS re-Flashed to correct a Read Error. JOHN ;) Timestamp: Thursday 04 Sep 2008, 15:32 --400 (Eastern Daylight Time) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10-svn4818: (MingW32) Comment: Public Key at: http://tinyurl.com/8cpho Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: https://www.gswot.org Comment: Homepage: http://tinyurl.com/yzhbhx iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJIwDfLAAoJEBCGy9eAtCsPyb0IAKOCVg1y6mxi2ZKb9drPTtd7 2jQbJP3a940Ws4IFsAtlZkkVdGuefCnmvzrYl21WFFOyeg3c4YFCiWjm43UzMnFC gupZVCKFhlA1x+wQg/78YERFJ8csvlZok0iqlyQePTpVBhtTfZOCuSLK5uLhVYQU nt4MUPCeb1ql255dtCOTBG4UY373lMv1wKWs/LmyffNJGcUj0Kqkx5HqJ05flbin kjWj8Re8yQHbov2uaYJr0N9LNHmngc2yNaaSowP8kIxk/fAzKXgc519MXfgy+FQD kv2789WXpVIWWE9ktAoWOd2xjXWzETr8jB7JPecY9eDeGq4Vk1MKwjx8o5MHrw8= =gojY -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Has anybody installed SP3 for XP?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 John W. Moore III escribió: > Allen Schultz wrote: >> There has bee no problem with the Hamachi and SP3. However, there has >> been some known problems with AMD chipsets and SP3. > > This 'problem' affected only HP/Compaq PC's that haven't had the BIOS > re-Flashed to correct a Read Error. Very good, my computer is not in the list, then... :) Thanks Best Regards -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJIwDpnAAoJEMV4f6PvczxAXdgIAKavc5Mx/oPI4ue99smeDrmO Zlf06V/hah5GIEO+SdCRBz2AffLADQc1aSj/2sgkdVWCoaTTyNkJPj4B2azpt2is bT2RoF+tD788xj1sSbUjvVcQ2raAIYAa3qeaiL6qB2mlPqlIKvpmpioh4cl41OJX 88EmhcwM8IeMIlTsKbTUTjsVyV6+RTqr5kTMayJ8biG2CDmRyo9v0ih3g9qkC4an 4u+3KUmn7I7ySD6SMH6eNQb5mbDFHddzBPX6R2RzlGB61EwAGG4b0fpJ2fbF8zec Y56Nrza4iIM5k91bLTFhk+R/aau/XH3wA7Glqm9pA04u/NnTzhyVMhjuYrjp1jA= =WSgz -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
