Re: Test mail to aldo...@gmail.com
2010/6/11 Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org Sorry for the inconvenience, No problem. -- Aldo Latino OpenPGP key: 4096R/0xA18E41E8 | bit.ly/keyDSA 84E2 2BC8 ABE3 DCC0 9F15 E511 4357 7ECD 4397 C730 ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: auto refresh-keys
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:50, d...@fifthhorseman.net said: here's a proposal: gpg could keep track of the last time it refreshed any given key from a public keyserver. when the user tries to use that That is one of the reasons why we should move away from the pubring.gpg format. The new keybox format allows to store such meta data. I hope to finish the migration of secret keys to gpg-agent in a few weeks. After that has been done gpg can move to the keybox format. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
undefined symbol: gc ry_md_hash_buffer
Hi, (i think i previously sent this question to the wrong mailinglist) I am installing collectd-4.10.0 on a CentOS 5 machine: 1) Configured collectd: ./configure --with-librrd=/opt/rrdtool-1.4.3/ --with-liboping=/opt/oping --with-libnetlink=/home/username/iproute2-2.6.29-1 --with-libgcrypt=/usr/lib 2) make followed by make install 3) Configured collectd.conf and this is the network plugin: Plugin network Server [IP adress here] 25826 SecurityLevel Sign Username client2 Password password2 /Server # TimeToLive 128 # Forward false # CacheFlush 1800 # ReportStats false /Plugin 4) Restarted collectd and got the following error: Stopping collectd: [FAILED] Starting collectd: /opt/collectd/sbin/collectd: symbol lookup error: /opt/collectd/lib/collectd/network.so: undefined symbol: gcry_md_hash_buffer I looked everywhere to find the problem but had no luck. I installed the same version of collectd on another machine exactly the steps above but it went smoothly and had no problem. Can someone please help me with this? Thanks in advace, h _ The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Test mail to ...
Werner's email was a good email to look for bots. Regards RR On 2010-06-13 16:24, FederalHill wrote: I have been reading them and trying to understand this issue, I thought it was solved. --- On Sun, 6/13/10, Road Runner r_run...@poczta.onet.pl wrote: From: Road Runner r_run...@poczta.onet.pl Subject: Re: Test mail to ... To: gnupg-users gnupg-users@gnupg.org Date: Sunday, June 13, 2010, 10:19 AM On 2010-06-11 09:38, Werner Koch wrote: Hi! One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an automated ticketing system which responds to the the poster. The owner of the ticketing system at secure.mpcustomer.com does not respond to any of our queries to send us more information on the mails triggering the posting. Thus we need to send these test mails in the hope to figure out the culprit. Sorry for the inconvenience, Werner Like the others I'm living too. RR ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: FYI: About my test mails
On 14 Jun 2010, at 08:18, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote: Did alava...@gmail.com ever get removed? I can see no evidence that this address is abusing this ML. It was also forwarding to the MP Customer ticket system but now seems resolved. Ben ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Fwd: [Full-disclosure] Introducing TGP...
Hello, there's this guy, named Timothy Mullen who recently released this TGP (Thor’s Godly Privacy) encryption utility for the cloud. Timothy wrote (note that his complete text goes forwarded below): ... I designed TGP with “encryption for the cloud” in mind. That means that not only does TGP do everything your normal PGP-type applications do, but it does things a bit differently – differently in a way that can change the way you work with your encrypted data. At the simplest level, this is done by encrypting data into byte arrays, and then converting those byte arrays into Base64 encoded text wrapped inside XML tags. In this way, not only do you get your typical file-based encrypted representation of your data, but you also get data that you can copy and paste directly into any email, mailing list, blog-page, or social networking site... Have anyone tested it so far? How different can this XML wrapped byte array encryption be? Is this cloud oriented difference only about its XML capabilities? He continues: ... What I think is interesting about this is that if we choose to, we no longer have to be the custodians of our encrypted data – we don’t have to worry about actually housing the files: we can just post them to the internet and let someone else assume the burden of storing the files for us... I can do the same with my keys... Is this crazy stuff? Maybe I'm the one who's getting crazy (and old) for not accepting this so called cloud trendy paradigm driven by megacorporations but that seems weird to me even if I think of combining this guy's proposal with, say, that Diceware methodology. Comments are really welcome. Thank you, regards, -- Forwarded message -- From: Thor (Hammer of God) t...@hammerofgod.com Date: Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 6:44 PM Subject: [Full-disclosure] Introducing TGP... To: full-disclos...@lists.grok.org.uk full-disclos...@lists.grok.org.uk This is what I’ve been talking about... Here is the first part of the docs I wrote up - make sure you see that I'm not yet supporting huge files unless you have huge RAM. **.Net 4.0 Client profile is required to run this.** Right now the install bits are only available on the pilot site at: http://www.owa.hammerofgod.com in the downloads section. I have to wait on Raging Haggis to return from Canada before posting on www.hammerofgod.com . Here's a bit from the TGP Overview document included with the install and on the web site. Please read through it before asking silly questions. :) Also, feel free to hack it up as much as you would like. I know this is full disclosure, so feel free to zing them at me, or if you prefer, I can work with you on any issues you might have. Remember, this is totally free, so my ability to handle custom requests will be limited. For those looking to break it, I would look at fuzzing the XML documents and the drag and drop public XML parsing feature. If you have questions or challenges about any of the security, I would ask to keep it on the list so that everyone can get the full benefit of productive security development. The read-me should pretty much lay everything out for you. If not, we'll take it up from there. t TGP – “Thor’s Godly Privacy” 06/13/10 v1.1.06 TGP is a small yet very powerful encryption utility. With all eyes on “the cloud,” I decided to write an encryption application better suited to an environment where portability and security were, at the least, challenging. In cloud computing, not only is the use of file structures becoming more abstract, but the very concept of a “file server” is becoming more and more ubiquitous. As such, I designed TGP with “encryption for the cloud” in mind. That means that not only does TGP do everything your normal PGP-type applications do, but it does things a bit differently – differently in a way that can change the way you work with your encrypted data. At the simplest level, this is done by encrypting data into byte arrays, and then converting those byte arrays into Base64 encoded text wrapped inside XML tags. In this way, not only do you get your typical file-based encrypted representation of your data, but you also get data that you can copy and paste directly into any email, mailing list, blog-page, or social networking site. What I think is interesting about this is that if we choose to, we no longer have to be the custodians of our encrypted data – we don’t have to worry about actually housing the files: we can just post them to the internet and let someone else assume the burden of storing the files for us. If I want to share encrypted files with someone or secure my own files, all I have to do is TGP encrypt the data I want, and post it to a mailing list somewhere. In the case of a list like Bugtraq or Full Disclosure, the data is actually automatically replicated out to any number of archive sites, thus distributing my data for me. I can literally be anywhere in the world
Re: Fwd: [Full-disclosure] Introducing TGP...
On 6/15/2010 6:20 PM, M.B.Jr. wrote: there's this guy, named Timothy Mullen who recently released this TGP (Thor’s Godly Privacy) encryption utility for the cloud. There is no formal spec for TGP which I've been able to find. I did not see any links to source on the site. While no source and no spec doesn't automatically mean TGP is bogus, it doesn't engender much confidence in the product. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Gnupg-users Digest, Vol 81, Issue 19
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ben hello: On 14 Jun 2010, at 08:18, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote: Did alava...@gmail.com ever get removed? I can see no evidence that this address is abusing this ML. It was also forwarding to the MP Customer ticket system but now seems resolved. === Please tell me more. When was this? I'd like not to be doing so and did not do so intentionally. === I suspected that I had a rootkit a couple of months ago, but reformatted the disk and reinstalled (OpenSUSE 11.2), use guarddog and rkhunter assiduously, with no indications of a problem. Haven't studied MUA reply protocols: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird:Help_Documentation:Mail-Followup-To_and_Mail-Reply-To But shall do so now, to ensure I am not offending you or others. But at present I see no reply-to addresses in my headers. If I am doing so it is certainly unintentional, as I have only replied here once before, and that by accident, which may have triggered werner's comment. It was late and I was intending to reply to gnucash, not gnupg... So this is only my second knowingly posted transmission to the group, so if you are getting others then something is decidedly wrong. Please instruct me. Best regards, Andy Lavarre -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iJwEAQECAAYFAkwYMbIACgkQOMMPCS4qbIZznAP/Ze4xI7a/fsBqWDSw6vUvzSlg 5s0JhI/nYQVVlqEXIV6EM+qP8Ykf5IIhLnB7nTIJpmOrFAwoeLAG6XR5Eouk3EdJ 8ppZ+6qFvO+PHUq/G0/40ZB/EURrPlm46MkTfKcNvRl7VMjW7usDg9mmDuUS8OWe B5F0BlrD9BjcDHPoXXk= =hP49 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
