Re: Gnupg good for big groups?
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:55:41 -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote: You would have to ask Paul. I suspect, though, that with only a low-thirtysomething number of nodes and a total number of messages in the neighborhood of six hundred, that there's not much confidence to be had in any trend. Exactly. I figured from the start that with few people and messages that I wasn't going to find anything more than gross trends. -Paul ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: batch program to find my password - help please!!!
Thanks to all for your hints. I succeeded to run rephrase but it didn't find the phrase. So I had to revoke my key and generate a new one... Josef Jeff Sadowski schrieb: On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:47 AM, wegwe...@gmx.de wrote: Just a repetition of my question, in a different way: Does anybody out there know of any script to brute force a list of passphrases? I never tried it before but maybe jack the ripper might help. I've only heard of it, never tried it. There was a procedure to try and get the old key less trusted and tell people to use a new key. Maybe someone can post the link to the page that tells you how to do that before I can find it. Josef ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: WoT cluster analysis tools?
On Tuesday 10 August 2010, Robin H. Johnson wrote: Not sure if such things exist already, but hopefully they do, and somebody could point me to them... To go into a little more detail, I'd like to examine the WoT as it exists between Gentoo developers, and try to work out a reasonable way to close it for resurrecting our long-dead keyring. Specifically interested in isolation of local clusters within the sets of keys. Two sets of keys, one of current developers only, and a second of all developers, past and present. Looking around, I find a few WoT graphing sites, but none of the tools used by said sites. Most likely most sites use a combination of a simple script (written in an arbitrary scripting language) extracting the graph's edges from a keyring and one of the graphviz tools (probably dot) for the visualization of the graphs. Regards, Ingo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: WoT cluster analysis tools?
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 04:52:12AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: Not sure if such things exist already, but hopefully they do, and somebody could point me to them... To go into a little more detail, I'd like to examine the WoT as it exists between Gentoo developers, and try to work out a reasonable way to close it for resurrecting our long-dead keyring. Specifically interested in isolation of local clusters within the sets of keys. Two sets of keys, one of current developers only, and a second of all developers, past and present. Looking around, I find a few WoT graphing sites, but none of the tools used by said sites. I think keyanalyze does exactly what you want. Given a keyring, it will list the strong set, in which everyone can reach everyone else, and isolated sets, which can be connected to the strong set with a single connection between sets. Any keys which aren't specifically listed are (essentially) only self-signed and also need a connection to/from the strong set. -- Jason Harris | NIC: JH329, PGP: This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it? jhar...@widomaker.com _|_ web: http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/ Got photons? (TM), (C) 2004 pgpSmqtNbhACm.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
