Re: GPG and PGP

2011-03-17 Thread Johan Wevers
Op 16-3-2011 17:38, ved...@nym.hush.com schreef:

 I've had a problem running Disastry's PGP 2.6.3 multi6 on 64 bit 
 windows systems, because the DOS command line window didn't work 
 with even Disastry's 32 bit pgp.exe.

That is because his executables are DOS executables and not win32
commandline programs. AFAIK win64 dumped the support for 16 bit DOS
programs altogether, I'm surprised the executable could be made to run
anyway. Compiling the source with a Windows compiler should solve that

 (I have both pgp 2.6.3m6 and gnupg 1.4.11 on a flash drive, and 
 they both run on 64 bit windows systems from a command line dos 
 window, without having pgp or gnupg installed.)

Technically on Windows NT and up, you don't have a DOS window but a
command shell, like Unix tcsh or bash.

 As mobile phones become bundled with OSes, it shouldn't be long 
 before gnupg can be run on a mobile.

I hope so, but this isn't an easy job. I remember it has been discussed
here before.

-- 
ir. J.C.A. Wevers //  Physics and science fiction site:
joh...@vulcan.xs4all.nl   //  http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/index.html
PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/pgpkeys.html


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


compatible with PGP/Desktop

2011-03-17 Thread Bill Albert
Is PGP/ENIGMAIL compatible with folks using Outlook or Microsoft Mail
with PGP Desktop?

I've tried searching for this but no luck,-- :-(


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Running GnuPG smartcard with CTAPI?

2011-03-17 Thread Malte Gell
Am Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:02:43 +0100
schrieb Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org:

 On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:31, malte.g...@gmx.de said:
 
  currently I have some trouble to get my Cyberjack running with
  PCSC. So I wonder, can GnuPG (2.0.16) also work with CTAPI drivers?
 
 I doubt that.  CTAPI has not been used for years.  There is some code
 still but it will eventually be removed.  
 
 Swap your Cyberjack against a real reader.  Reiner stuff does not
 comply to any modern standards.  Or well, only to their own
 interpretation of the standards.

They supported Linux at least... what other brand would you recommend?
(Security class III with pinpad and display with Linux support).

Regards
Malte

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Language question

2011-03-17 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Thursday 17 March 2011, Charly Avital wrote:
 Hi,
 
 when the user's locale is e.g. French, and she/he is generating a key
 in Terminal (or DOS prompt, if that's what it is called in Windows),
  is the interactive dialogue displayed in French (or in the language
 of the user's locale)?
 Ditto for all other gpg interactive dialogues.

On Linux this the case. Why do you ask?


Regards,
Ingo


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GPG and PGP

2011-03-17 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Wednesday 16 March 2011, Mark H. Wood wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 09:15:45AM +0100, Johan Wevers wrote:
  Op 15-3-2011 21:32, Ben McGinnes schreef:
   That's probably a worthwhile discussion to have.  Even if RFC1991
   support is maintained, there's still value in migrating encrypted
   data to more robust algorithms.
  
  Only if IDEA gets broken (or the pgp 2.x implementation of it turns
  out flawed) or, very unlikely, 128 bit can be brute-forced in the
  future.
 
 On that day it would be well to already know what to do about it and
 already have the tools in hand.

Obviously.


 It would be best to have already done so.

I'm not so sure about this. Migration requires decryption of the 
encrypted data. This introduces an attack vector that does not exist if 
you keep the data encrypted with IDEA.


Regards,
Ingo


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Language question

2011-03-17 Thread Charly Avital
Ingo Klöcker wrote the following on 3/17/11 3:41 PM:
 On Thursday 17 March 2011, Charly Avital wrote:
 Hi,

 when the user's locale is e.g. French, and she/he is generating a key
 in Terminal (or DOS prompt, if that's what it is called in Windows),
  is the interactive dialogue displayed in French (or in the language
 of the user's locale)?
 Ditto for all other gpg interactive dialogues.
 
 On Linux this the case. Why do you ask?
 
 
 Regards,
 Ingo

Hi Ingo,

I'm asking because in the course of localizing an application written
for Mac users, and that is a GUI for interactive actions that can be
carried via Terminal by Command Line Instructions, I have found several
terms that are exactly the ones that are displayed in Terminal.

I was surprised that in spite of being a GUI, it was still necessary to
actually include those interactive processes in the body of the
applications, whereas _*maybe*_ it would have been possible to somehow
create an interface that would have retrieved the interactive commands
and actions from GnuPG running in the language required for the
localization.

I have *not* written the application (I have no programing skills or
even knowledge), but was just helping to localize the required strings.

Thanks,
Charly



___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: GPG and PGP

2011-03-17 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Wednesday 16 March 2011, Johan Wevers wrote:
 Op 15-3-2011 21:57, Ingo Klöcker schreef:
  Why migrate away? Even if GnuPG 3 stops supporting RFC1991 there
  will always be GnuPG 1 and GnuPG 2 around to decrypt ancient data
  and verify signatures made decades ago.
 
 If that is the case, you could also say we still have pgp 2.x arround
 including source code.

Sure. That's definitely an option for old data that can be decrypted 
with PGP 2.


  That's the beauty of Free Software. Nobody
  can take it away and since it's Open Source it will always be
  possible to compile it on new OSes (provided we will be
  able/allowed to install what we want on those OSes).
 
 Current OSes pose already a problem. PGP 2 did not provide nagtive
 binaries for win32 so I compiled them myself, which was easy (just
 make a new project file in VC5, add all C files and press compile).
 Added benefit was long filename support. Now I have a Symbian phone
 and an Android tablet, but I have no idea how to decrypt messages on
 those devices. The source of pgp and GnuPG is freely available, but
 without a C compiler you need to port them to the Symbian version of
 C and the Google Java clone, or write a compiler yourself. The first
 task is a huge effort I'm not sure I could even do myself and I'm
 certainly not up to the second.

The good thing is that you are not alone. ;-)

And if nobody wants to do it you still have the option to pay somebody 
for doing it.


Regards,
Ingo


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


keyservers

2011-03-17 Thread Andrew Long
Anyone else having problems accessing pool.sks-keyservers.net? I've  
tried pointing nslookup at a couple of the root DNS name servers and  
get DOMAIN (not known)


Regards, Andy
--
Andrew Long
andrew dot long at mac dot com





PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: keyservers

2011-03-17 Thread Grant Olson
On 3/17/11 4:43 PM, Andrew Long wrote:
 Anyone else having problems accessing pool.sks-keyservers.net? I've
 tried pointing nslookup at a couple of the root DNS name servers and get
 DOMAIN (not known)
 

There were a few emails on sks-devel this morning.  Apparently it is
indeed down.

http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/sks-devel/2011-03/msg00017.html

-- 
Grant

I am gravely disappointed. Again you have made me unleash my dogs of war.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: keyservers

2011-03-17 Thread Charly Avital
Andrew Long wrote the following on 3/17/11 4:43 PM:
 Anyone else having problems accessing pool.sks-keyservers.net? I've  
 tried pointing nslookup at a couple of the root DNS name servers and  
 get DOMAIN (not known)
 
 Regards, Andy

Was down two hours ago, still down now 5:30 PM DST.

Charly

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users