can i use gnupg in commercial application ?
if yes , can i add it to my installer ? ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: can i use gnupg in commercial application ?
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Meir Yanovich meiry...@gmail.com wrote: if yes , can i add it to my installer ? http://lmgtfy.com/?q=gnupg+license ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Why is --allow-non-selfsigned-uid needed to import this key?
On Mon, 16 May 2011 19:32, steve.stro...@link-comm.com said: root:~ gpg --import test-key.gpg gpg: key CBF38289 was created 137948617 seconds in the future (time warp or clock problem) Try the option --ignore-time-conflict . Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: GPG Problem - invalid radix64 character
On Tue, 17 May 2011 00:35, jer...@jeromebaum.com said: were made for different purposes and I think you're stretching GPG very far if you want to encrypt big streams of data. That's more something OpenSSL As a Unix tool GPG is designed to work on arbitrary data lengths. The problem is mereley that at one point gpg needs to see the end of the data to check the signature (or at least the MDC). Thus the command pairs tar cf - . | gpg -er foo | tooltosenddata tooltorecvdata | gpg --batch | tar xf - should always work. scp is much easier, though. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ksba_cms_set_enc_val failed: Invalid S-expression
I want to encrypt files with an X.509 public key DSA 1024 bits. With public test keays it works fine. But when I try it with the one I need to use in production the following error occures: ksba_cms_set_enc_val failed: Invalid S-expression I'm totally puzzled. I'm no encryption expert either. I user gpgsm -e -r certname file.pdf file.pdf.encrypt. version is gnupg for windows 2.1.0. Can somebody help? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/ksba_cms_set_enc_val-failed%3A-Invalid-S-expression-tp31636516p31636516.html Sent from the GnuPG - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: GPG Problem - invalid radix64 character
On 16 maj 2011, at 18.35, Jerome Baum wrote: So, start at the beginning of scrapped data (with a copy, of course), fill in As until you reach the 76 (or 80) limit, fill in a line break, continue with As, repeat until nothing left. That was a lot more difficult than it sounded!! :) I tried vi, emacs, sed, tr and finaly perl (!!). Perl finaly managed to find and replace the faulty characters... Something in the TERM I guess... But the last part didn't end up at the 64 char limit the other lines have. Instead, the last char on that line is at position 15. Would that be a problem? GnuPG may choke on an incorrect checksum, but there should be an override option or it might just spit out the file anyway. Are you thinking about the '--ignore-crc-error' option? -- You know, boys, a nuclear reactor is a lot like a woman. You just have to read the manual and press the right buttons - Homer Simpson ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: ksba_cms_set_enc_val failed: Invalid S-expression
On Tue, 17 May 2011 12:20, max.van.po...@gmail.com said: I want to encrypt files with an X.509 public key DSA 1024 bits. With public I once did some test with DSA under X.509 but that was all. It is very likely that it won't work in a real environment. Virtually nobody is using DSA with X.509. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: GPG Problem - invalid radix64 character
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 14:22, Turbo Fredriksson tu...@bayour.com wrote: On 16 maj 2011, at 21.11, Jerome Baum wrote: On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 19:08, Turbo Fredriksson tu...@bayour.com wrote: I've locked at some encrypted FS's, but none of them where secure enough. In what sense? Can you elaborate? See also my comment below. Didn't allow big enough keys of good algorithms for one... IIRC, OpenSSL places no limit on key-size. However, try openssl genrsa 16384 and see how long that takes... I would suggest you just symmetrically encrypt the data. If you really need public-key encryption, use gpg to encrypt the key-file. The theoretical security is about the same, and practically the significant factors will be where you store your key, what temp files you leave around, etc. It was many years since I looked at encryption, so I've forgot most of what I once learned (never actually needed it :). But isn't symmetric encryption 'easy' to crack? Given enough CPU? Not at all. In fact, most public-key crypto systems will symmetrically encrypt your data with a random session key and only asymmetrically encrypt the session key. This is a Good Thing in performance and security terms -- performance because AES tends to be faster than RSA (for instance), and security because this method has been extensively studied. I find it hard to believe that anything would be better than a 3072 bit DSA key with a 4096 bit ELG key which expires in a month... ? Those are very absolute numbers and the statement is very strong. In practice it's much more about key management than about key-size. Personally I opted for a 4096-bit RSA key, which is a somewhat arbitrary choice based on my gut and the intended duration of the key. Others go for 2048 bits, some go for a DSA master key, etc. -- it's just a matter of preference and in most cases you should be focusing your efforts elsewhere. As Werner has correctly pointed out, you _can_ use gpg for this task. I would personally still opt for OpenSSL, though. It feels like the right tool for this, and gpg seems designed more for block data than streams, more for communication than personal encryption, etc. -- there's lots of WoT stuff built-in that you get with the package and may never use, which OpenSSL doesn't have. etc. -- Jerome Baum tel +49-1578-8434336 email jer...@jeromebaum.com -- PGP: A0E4 B2D4 94E6 20EE 85BA E45B 63E4 2BD8 C58C 753A PGP: 2C23 EBFF DF1A 840D 2351 F5F5 F25B A03F 2152 36DA ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: GPG Problem - invalid radix64 character
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 14:16, Turbo Fredriksson tu...@bayour.com wrote: But the last part didn't end up at the 64 char limit the other lines have. Instead, the last char on that line is at position 15. Would that be a problem? It doesn't sound good but just go ahead and try. How long does a single run take? I'd say just start the run right now -- you can do other stuff while it's running (e.g. looking further into the file), so just start it and move on. GnuPG may choke on an incorrect checksum, but there should be an override option or it might just spit out the file anyway. Are you thinking about the '--ignore-crc-error' option? Yes, that was it. -- Jerome Baum tel +49-1578-8434336 email jer...@jeromebaum.com -- PGP: A0E4 B2D4 94E6 20EE 85BA E45B 63E4 2BD8 C58C 753A PGP: 2C23 EBFF DF1A 840D 2351 F5F5 F25B A03F 2152 36DA ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: can i use gnupg in commercial application ?
On 5/17/2011 2:05 AM, Meir Yanovich wrote: if yes , can i add it to my installer ? The answer is, yes, so long as you comply with the terms of Version 3.0 of the GNU General Public License. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Key generation on card fails with key sizes larger than 1024 bits
On Sat, 14 May 2011 18:12, ventur...@gmail.com said: I purchased a v2 OpenPGP card for use with a SCM SCR335 card reader, attempting to generate keys larger than 1024 bits fails, I've been This should definitely work. To help you we need more input: What version of GnuPG are you running (gpg --version)? Are you using pcscd? (it seems not). I've set debug-all in my gpg-agent scdaemon config files to get Add verbose debug 1024 debug-ccid-driver log-file /foo/bar/scdaemon.log to ~/.gnupg/scdaemon.conf . This will give you a more detailed debug output. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Why is --allow-non-selfsigned-uid needed to import this key?
On Mon, 16 May 2011 22:12, steve.stro...@link-comm.com said: easy to ask the user for the date. What would the security implications be of just setting the clock to a fixed future date before importing the key? I can see no problems from GnuPG's perspective. I suggest to start with a fixed date way before 2038. There is also an option --ignore-valid-drom which pertains to the selection of subkeys. Check the man page. Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Why is --allow-non-selfsigned-uid needed to import this key?
Werner Koch 8762p9qsg4@vigenere.g10code.de wrote on 5/17/11 5:04:27 PM: I can see no problems from GnuPG's perspective. I suggest to start with a fixed date way before 2038. There is also an option --ignore-valid-drom which pertains to the selection of subkeys. Check the man page. Did you mean (copy-paste from the man page): --ignore-valid-from GnuPG normally does not select and use subkeys created in the future. This option allows the use of such keys and thus exhibits the pre-1.0.7 behaviour. You should not use this option unless you there is some clock problem. See also --ignore-time-conflict for timestamp issues with signatures. Charly ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
bug: gpg fails to allow update of OpenPGP certification after expiration
My certification on a key+userID recently expired. I went to re-certify it, and gpg failed to allow the re-certification, with the following interaction: foo (redacted) was already signed by key D21739E9 Your current signature on foo (redacted) has expired. Do you want to issue a new signature to replace the expired one? (y/N) y Nothing to sign with key D21739E9 Key not changed so no update needed. Note that no additional certification was added. There were two certifications by D21739E9 on the key in question already: A) one certification from 2008 with no expiration date B) a certification from 2010 with an expiration date in early 2011 Given the OpenPGP standard, B should supercede A. It appears that what happens is that when the user says y to the prompt, gpg effectively deletes signature B from the temporary view of local keyring, leaving it with A. It then decides that A is sufficient, and declines to do anything. Since no changes have been made, it doesn't even save the updated local keyring. I have two workarounds: 0) manually delete A from my local keyring first, with something like: gpg --edit-key $KEYID 1 delsig 1) use gpg's --expert flag to force my way through. I note that if i use either of these methods to create a new certification, then my local keyring ends up without (B) at all (though it is of course re-fetchable from the public keyservers). I consider this is surprising behavior, though given that i'm in workaround territory, i suppose any surprises should be expected. --dkg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Key generation on card fails with key sizes larger than 1024 bits
Hi Werner On 17 May 2011 13:43, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote: On Sat, 14 May 2011 18:12, ventur...@gmail.com said: I purchased a v2 OpenPGP card for use with a SCM SCR335 card reader, attempting to generate keys larger than 1024 bits fails, I've been This should definitely work. To help you we need more input: What version of GnuPG are you running (gpg --version)? gpg (GnuPG) 2.0.17 libgcrypt 1.4.6 Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Home: ~/.gnupg Supported algorithms: Pubkey: RSA, ELG, DSA Cipher: 3DES, CAST5, BLOWFISH, AES, AES192, AES256, TWOFISH, CAMELLIA128, CAMELLIA192, CAMELLIA256 Hash: MD5, SHA1, RIPEMD160, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512, SHA224 Compression: Uncompressed, ZIP, ZLIB, BZIP2 Are you using pcscd? (it seems not). No, I assumed I didn't need to as the reader works fine with the internal CCID driver (I can fetch card status, edit card details generate 1024bit keyson the card) I have the first reader listed on: http://www.gnupg.org/howtos/card-howto/en/smartcard-howto-single.html#id2503342 scdaemon.log output on FreeBSD: 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: T=1: waittime extension of bwi=100 scdaemon[95141]: chan_7 - S PROGRESS card_busy w 0 0 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: PC_to_RDR_XfrBlock: 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: dwLength ..: 5 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: bSlot .: 0 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: bSeq ..: 123 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: bBWI ..: 0x04 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: wLevelParameter ...: 0x 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: [0010] 00 E3 01 64 86 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: RDR_to_PC_DataBlock: 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: dwLength ..: 5 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: bSlot .: 0 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: bSeq ..: 123 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: bStatus ...: 0 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: bChainParameter ...: 0x04 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: [0010] 00 C3 01 64 A6 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: T=1: S-block request received cmd=3 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: T=1: waittime extension of bwi=100 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: PC_to_RDR_XfrBlock: 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: dwLength ..: 5 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: bSlot .: 0 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: bSeq ..: 124 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: bBWI ..: 0x04 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: wLevelParameter ...: 0x 2011-05-17 17:55:44 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: [0010] 00 E3 01 64 86 2011-05-17 17:55:49 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: usb_bulk_read error: Device busy 2011-05-17 17:55:49 scdaemon[95141] ccid_transceive failed: (0x1000a) 2011-05-17 17:55:49 scdaemon[95141] apdu_send_simple(0) failed: card I/O error 2011-05-17 17:55:49 scdaemon[95141] generating key failed 2011-05-17 17:55:49 scdaemon[95141] operation genkey result: Card error scdaemon[95141]: chan_7 - ERR 100663404 Card error SCD 2011-05-17 17:55:49 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: usb_bulk_read error: Device busy 2011-05-17 17:55:49 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: USB: CALLING USB_CLEAR_HALT 2011-05-17 17:55:51 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: usb_bulk_read error: Device busy 2011-05-17 17:55:51 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: USB: RETRYING bulk_in AGAIN 2011-05-17 17:55:51 scdaemon[95141] DBG: ccid-driver: bulk-in seqno does not match (127/125) scdaemon[95141]: chan_7 - RESTART scdaemon[95141]: chan_7 - OK On OpenBSD: 2011-05-17 19:12:41 scdaemon[13770] DBG: ccid-driver: PC_to_RDR_XfrBlock: 2011-05-17 19:12:41 scdaemon[13770] DBG: ccid-driver: dwLength ..: 17 2011-05-17 19:12:41 scdaemon[13770] DBG: ccid-driver: bSlot .: 0 2011-05-17 19:12:41 scdaemon[13770] DBG: ccid-driver: bSeq ..: 124 2011-05-17 19:12:41 scdaemon[13770] DBG: ccid-driver: bBWI ..: 0x04 2011-05-17 19:12:41 scdaemon[13770] DBG: ccid-driver: wLevelParameter ...: 0x 2011-05-17 19:12:41 scdaemon[13770] DBG: ccid-driver: [0010] 00 40 0D 00 20 00 2011-05-17 19:12:41 scdaemon[13770] DBG: ccid-driver: [0016] 83 08 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 EE 2011-05-17 19:12:41 scdaemon[13770] DBG: ccid-driver: RDR_to_PC_DataBlock: 2011-05-17 19:12:41 scdaemon[13770] DBG: ccid-driver: dwLength
An Invitation to Neuroscientists and Physicists: Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Reports First Hand Account of Mind Intrusion and Mind Reading
16 May 2011 Monday 7:28 P.M. Singapore Time For Immediate Release SINGAPORE, SINGAPORE - Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) would like to report first hand account of mind intrusion and mind reading. I have been hearing voices for quite some time now but I have not been able to identify the persons physically. A number of un-identified persons have intruded into my mind and they are able to read my thoughts. I could not explain the mechanism by which these un-identified persons have been reading my mind at the moment but there is definitely a scientific explanation for it. I know very clearly that I am not suffering from schizophrenia at all. I am fully aware that no common man would believe me except the select few scientific researchers working in top secret government projects and the human guinea pigs who are being experimented on. One of the possibilities is that I have a microchip implanted into my brain, possibly when I was an infant. It may take a few years, a few decades, or even a few centuries before mind reading is finally brought to light before the general public. I would like to invite neuroscientists, engineers and physicists to speak on the scientific explanation behind mind intrusion and mind reading. Please remember what Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) have said. Mark my words. You will know the truth in future. It is no longer a conspiracy theory. I can affirm that it (mind intrusion and mind reading) is indeed happening to me. Yours truly, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Dip(Mechatronics)(Singapore Polytechnic) BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)(National University of Singapore) Singapore Identity Card No/NRIC: S78*6*2*H Toa Payoh Lorong 5, Singapore Mobile Phone: +65-8369-2618 ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: An Invitation to Neuroscientists and Physicists: Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Reports First Hand Account of Mind Intrusion and Mind Reading
It's Called INCEPTION ! Cheers! --AA On 17 May 2011 19:42, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) singapore_citizen_mr_teo_en_m...@yahoo.com.sg wrote: 16 May 2011 Monday 7:28 P.M. Singapore Time For Immediate Release SINGAPORE, SINGAPORE - Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) would like to report first hand account of mind intrusion and mind reading. I have been hearing voices for quite some time now but I have not been able to identify the persons physically. A number of un-identified persons have intruded into my mind and they are able to read my thoughts. I could not explain the mechanism by which these un-identified persons have been reading my mind at the moment but there is definitely a scientific explanation for it. I know very clearly that I am not suffering from schizophrenia at all. I am fully aware that no common man would believe me except the select few scientific researchers working in top secret government projects and the human guinea pigs who are being experimented on. One of the possibilities is that I have a microchip implanted into my brain, possibly when I was an infant. It may take a few years, a few decades, or even a few centuries before mind reading is finally brought to light before the general public. I would like to invite neuroscientists, engineers and physicists to speak on the scientific explanation behind mind intrusion and mind reading. Please remember what Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) have said. Mark my words. You will know the truth in future. It is no longer a conspiracy theory. I can affirm that it (mind intrusion and mind reading) is indeed happening to me. Yours truly, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Dip(Mechatronics)(Singapore Polytechnic) BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)(National University of Singapore) Singapore Identity Card No/NRIC: S78*6*2*H Toa Payoh Lorong 5, Singapore Mobile Phone: +65-8369-2618 ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users -- Gnupg key: 02375205 Fingerprint: F7CD D181 943B 0453 8668 AF16 84E9 7565 0237 5205 ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: An Invitation to Neuroscientists and Physicists: Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Reports First Hand Account of Mind Intrusion and Mind Reading
Andre Amorim wrote: It's Called INCEPTION ! I thought it was callee SPAM ! If I thought the O.P. would even read this, I might suggest he resume his medication. If I believed he was not schizophrenic, I would refer him to this web site: http://www.biomindsuperpowers.com/Pages/intro.html Ingo Swann, whose site it is, is not a kook nor is he a nut. He has been closely involved in scientific investigations of what are usually called psychic phenomena since the early 1970s, if not before. Many of these studies were done at Stanford Research Institute, under the sponsorship of various 3-letter agencies. Studying that web site (there are hundreds of pages) would show that psychic phenomena have been known since at least 400 B.C.E., and have been scientifically investigated since about 1875, or a little earlier, by quite reputable scientists. Mind reading, better known as telepathy has been shown statistically significant, as have remote viewing, and related phenomena. There are dozens of books on these subjects by people, some of whom worked in this area for the U.S.Military. If the O.P. is serious, he could do some research on this on the Internet. But encryption, such as by using gpg, will not be a defense from attacks of this kind. -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jerseyhttp://counter.li.org ^^-^^ 17:50:01 up 31 days, 21:08, 3 users, load average: 5.10, 4.95, 4.87 ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Fwd: An Invitation to Neuroscientists and Physicists: Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Reports First Hand Account of Mind Intrusion and Mind Reading
[a list that doesn't set/change Reply-To.] Begin forwarded message: From: Turbo Fredriksson tu...@bayour.com Date: on 18 maj 2011 01.24.17 GMT+02:00 To: Jean-David Beyer jeandav...@verizon.net Subject: Re: An Invitation to Neuroscientists and Physicists: Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Reports First Hand Account of Mind Intrusion and Mind Reading On 18 maj 2011, at 00.04, Jean-David Beyer wrote: If the O.P. is serious, he could do some research on this on the Internet. But encryption, such as by using gpg, will not be a defense from attacks of this kind. Yeah.. I mean, where would he put the public/private keys!? They can't BOTH be in his head (someone could just read his mind to get the private one, right?)... And waking up in the morning, having to input the passphrase to unlock the brain. Before the coffey!? Wouldn't work for me, that for sure... -- I love deadlines. I love the whooshing noise they make as they go by. - Douglas Adams -- You know, boys, a nuclear reactor is a lot like a woman. You just have to read the manual and press the right buttons - Homer Simpson ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: An Invitation to Neuroscientists and Physicists
On 5/17/2011 5:07 PM, Andre Amorim wrote: It's Called INCEPTION ! There are two major possibilities here: either the poster is correct, or the poster is incorrect. If correct, he deserves our compassion for the troubles others are inflicting upon him. If incorrect, he deserves our compassion for the troubles his own mind is inflicting upon him. Either way, let's show a little polite discretion. Thanks. :) ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
GPG keys listed are not correct.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear GnuPG staff, I have Virtualbox-4.0.6 installed ok on my Linux machine, but on updating to the newest one . . . . I got the following messages using(KDE) kpackage kit: === 1 - The GPG keys listed for the Fedora 14 - x86_64 - VirtualBox repository are already installed but they are not correct for this package. 2 - Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository. === Sorry for this question but: How to install the correct GPG keys for this package? where are the correct key URLs, and where to configure it? Please. Ps. Besides Virtualbox I have installed Firefox Thunderbird. Thanks. - -- Lucélio Gomes de Freitas ETFCSF- U.G.F.- P.U.C.(RJ) Engº, Analista Suporte(Free Mind). Email: aa.luce...@gmail.com Tel: 55 0XX 21 85964911 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk3TCz0ACgkQENqGaHfBA/dtfQEAtEyOMSFvrMku6EUamE8PfxUv OxZPKrnUYwriGwXxN30A/0sdExL3/kGrYKldW9hfdrP3LTOF3nYFKMfwcDijaTdc =9Nue -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: GPG keys listed are not correct.
Hi Lucelio-- On 05/17/2011 07:56 PM, Lucélio Gomes de Freitas wrote: I have Virtualbox-4.0.6 installed ok on my Linux machine, but on updating to the newest one . . . . I got the following messages using(KDE) kpackage kit: [...] Sorry for this question but: How to install the correct GPG keys for this package? where are the correct key URLs, and where to configure it? Please. I think you'll need to ask these questions to either the kpackage kit folks (whatever that is) or the Fedora folks; gpg just provides the tools these projects use to verify their software downloads; the gnupg project doesn't distribute their particular keys. Note: if these problems arose from running something from the command line (i don't know if you were using a GUI package manager or a command within a terminal emulator), you might want to provide more context for whoever you contact next. Here are some useful tips for getting troubleshooting help for working from the command line: https://support.mayfirst.org/wiki/terminal_transcripts Regards, --dkg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: GPG keys listed are not correct.
On 05/17/2011 06:56 PM, Lucélio Gomes de Freitas wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear GnuPG staff, I have Virtualbox-4.0.6 installed ok on my Linux machine, but on updating to the newest one . . . . I got the following messages using(KDE) kpackage kit: === 1 - The GPG keys listed for the Fedora 14 - x86_64 - VirtualBox repository are already installed but they are not correct for this package. 2 - Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository. === Sorry for this question but: How to install the correct GPG keys for this package? where are the correct key URLs, and where to configure it? Please. Ps. Besides Virtualbox I have installed Firefox Thunderbird. Thanks. Are you just trying to update virtualbox or Fedora in general ? If Fedora, have you verified that the GPG key's for that release are installed? You might want to reference https://fedoraproject.org/keys If it is just that one RPM you are trying to update and the key is failing I would suggest contacting the packager of Virtualbox or making an inquiry on the Fedora Users Mailing list which you can join at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
