Re: group in gpg.conf but gpgmail does not honor/see
On 13 Nov 2011, at 21:31, Doug Barton wrote: > On 11/13/2011 09:29, MFPA wrote: >> There was a brief discussion about group lines on PGPNET a few months >> ago. IIRC, the specifics under discussion were spaces and angle >> brackets. >> >> I don't think any conclusions were reached, but it may be worth >> experimenting with >> >> group =0x >> group =0x >> group = 0x >> group pgp...@yahoogroups.com=0x >> group pgp...@yahoogroups.com =0x >> group pgp...@yahoogroups.com = 0x > > Sean, take MFPA's advice and try different combinations of spaces and > angle brackets as above. I would be very surprised if gpgmail scanned > the gpg.conf or the key files directly. It's far more likely that it's > asking gpg to encrypt to an e-mail address that looks like $this. > Figuring out what the "$this" is should allow you to use the group line > transparently. > I will have aplay later on, but I am nearly sure that it is reading the key file. I created a dummy key for the group and gpgmail gave me the option to encrypt but with out the key no option to encrypt is available, only sign sean ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: group in gpg.conf but gpgmail does not honor/see
On 11/13/2011 09:29, MFPA wrote: > There was a brief discussion about group lines on PGPNET a few months > ago. IIRC, the specifics under discussion were spaces and angle > brackets. > > I don't think any conclusions were reached, but it may be worth > experimenting with > > group =0x > group =0x > group = 0x > group pgp...@yahoogroups.com=0x > group pgp...@yahoogroups.com =0x > group pgp...@yahoogroups.com = 0x Sean, take MFPA's advice and try different combinations of spaces and angle brackets as above. I would be very surprised if gpgmail scanned the gpg.conf or the key files directly. It's far more likely that it's asking gpg to encrypt to an e-mail address that looks like $this. Figuring out what the "$this" is should allow you to use the group line transparently. Doug -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: group in gpg.conf but gpgmail does not honor/see
On 13 Nov 2011, at 17:29, MFPA wrote: > > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi > > > On Sunday 13 November 2011 at 2:22:28 PM, in > , Sean Rima wrote: > >> I am looking for a work around to the gpgmail on osx >> not using the group line in the gpg.conf file. I can >> drop to a terminal but it is not the best idea. > > > There was a brief discussion about group lines on PGPNET a few months > ago. IIRC, the specifics under discussion were spaces and angle > brackets. > > I don't think any conclusions were reached, but it may be worth > experimenting with > > group =0x > group =0x > group = 0x > group pgp...@yahoogroups.com=0x > group pgp...@yahoogroups.com =0x > group pgp...@yahoogroups.com = 0x > > Experience has shown me The Bat! will only match on email address and > requires the angle brackets for the group line to work. And testing > has shown that the spaces make no difference in my current set-up. I'm > reasonably sure somebody posted that they had to remove the angle > brackets to get the group line to work on their set-up. > > I don't recall whether anybody reported any significance of spaces, or > whether it was just noted that somebody else used them and I didn't, > and that each of us was just following the pattern we first saw. If I goto the command line and use the -r command line option gpg picks up the group ok, however gpgmail is just scanning the keyfile and not finding a key for the group, ie the email address I think the group line is a feature that is not widely used, if it is used elsewhere indeed. Apart from the pgpnet group on Yahoo, I have not seen it used > >> I was wondering if I created a key with the address of >> the group line, would gpg encrypt to the group line or >> just the key. > > I suspect if it is not "seeing" the group line, it would still not see > it. But who knows? > I think it is the way that gpgmail is written it scans the keyfile and not the gpg.conf file, I guess few email rograms would. I may try creating a simple key for the group and see if gpg will encrypt to the group line as well or instead of the created key. Sean ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Convert a .sig file to .asc file (is it possible)?
reflum, On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 10:17 +0100, Csabi wrote: > Hi all! > > It is possible to convert an already created .sig file to .asc file? > (ASCII armored output)? > > I would like to convert some .sig (detached signature) files to .asc files. > Can anybody write a method how can i do it? > > Best regards, Csabi gpg --enarmor bla.sig -- Philipp. (Rah of PH2) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: group in gpg.conf but gpgmail does not honor/see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi On Sunday 13 November 2011 at 2:22:28 PM, in , Sean Rima wrote: > I am looking for a work around to the gpgmail on osx > not using the group line in the gpg.conf file. I can > drop to a terminal but it is not the best idea. There was a brief discussion about group lines on PGPNET a few months ago. IIRC, the specifics under discussion were spaces and angle brackets. I don't think any conclusions were reached, but it may be worth experimenting with group =0x group =0x group = 0x group pgp...@yahoogroups.com=0x group pgp...@yahoogroups.com =0x group pgp...@yahoogroups.com = 0x Experience has shown me The Bat! will only match on email address and requires the angle brackets for the group line to work. And testing has shown that the spaces make no difference in my current set-up. I'm reasonably sure somebody posted that they had to remove the angle brackets to get the group line to work on their set-up. I don't recall whether anybody reported any significance of spaces, or whether it was just noted that somebody else used them and I didn't, and that each of us was just following the pattern we first saw. > I was wondering if I created a key with the address of > the group line, would gpg encrypt to the group line or > just the key. I suspect if it is not "seeing" the group line, it would still not see it. But who knows? - -- Best regards MFPAmailto:expires2...@ymail.com Gypsy Dwarf Escapes Prison: Small Medium at large -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQCVAwUBTr/+iaipC46tDG5pAQoFGAP+OYHzgkTrFaW1lTmyqEH7MWaIos+m9F+W iPLU+l2hEm5dWsA5ExswL+dwyVhcefnjQWz6Z3GZ+mxMrK136QvwJIsDfrLVOnok zdelk3kgfQz/GMEmML129M88GvlOPF//UcfY1tI9T6to88oEE7dEJDzfC1vMQyZ3 cCVd2WMnJ54= =3Sg4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
group in gpg.conf but gpgmail does not honor/see
Hi I am looking for a work around to the gpgmail on osx not using the group line in the gpg.conf file. I can drop to a terminal but it is not the best idea. I was wondering if I created a key with the address of the group line, would gpg encrypt to the group line or just the key. It is for the pgpnet group on yahoo if that help Sean ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Signing already-encrypted files (all to self)?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 El 11-11-2011 19:57, Doug Barton escribió: > On 11/11/2011 14:54, Chris Poole wrote: ... >> OK thanks, I hadn't thought of that. I'd still have to decrypt >> and re-encrypt them to keep hashes of all plaintext versions of >> the files though. (Thinking about running this script every few >> days and hashing the latest files pulled from the IMAP server; >> it'd be far easier just to find any files not ending in ".gpg" to >> hash.) > > I think this came up last time and I don't remember the reason you > didn't like the solution, but wouldn't something like truecrypt be > a whole heckuva lot easier? That time there was a portability requirement, but that doesn't seem to be the current case. A truecrypt container would solve the problem, since it both keeps the files encrypted, and unless the container is decrypted, people can't put fake files inside. Best Regards -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOv52vAAoJEMV4f6PvczxAmzkH/3pOcSJC15vEL9CsSkhfTF00 WVkwVneOD9Gbl0lgW3HDI2AIRkoxQeg8wQvjlVlhvIH+q5+3yPQ5H+fj1ZBxoaU4 HINiXQgU0GD0ShMG+fe/PH3pi3XRbZATaXlFbkq56geg2hLkxlrIaHwekZ2MKN5R at8EVDrFcESumiGcGWJ0+ajnfiwBfTqm5Jn/CPxhpVWP6H+98HKEKmEOtEwyZ8iV KhfdyzAwmLL+eKt77sw63NNuDGHvqDFVuvmrbqupjkB0nhBVDvDYnht1//t82ToC u7JYYLqxzUcb+7yLkinaGgqxrAn0DlHDTF5FWKXnXgvu4TsPI1e6noBqDKXBt48= =CHVf -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Convert a .sig file to .asc file (is it possible)?
Thx the script, i will try it. Many thanx! Best regards, Csabi ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
