Re: how to do

[J. David Boyd]

Paul R. Ramer free10...@gmail.com writes:

 On July 9, 2014 11:40:06 AM PDT, MFPA 
 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Wednesday 9 July 2014 at 5:54:36 PM, in
mid:3222188.kZ1ztGDBqg@inno, Hauke Laging wrote:


 Am Di 08.07.2014, 14:41:36 schrieb J. David Boyd:
 which means that any of them can make changes to your
 keys.

 And that is wrong.

Please can you elaborate on how it is incorrect to say that somebody
who knows the passphrase to a secret key can make changes to that key.
Would this maybe be the case when using an encryption subkey with an
offline main key?

 If you make encryption and signing subkeys you can export them
 (i.e. the secret subkeys), create a new gnupg home directory, import
 the subkeys, change the password on them, and finally, export and
 distribute them to the people who are supposed to use them.

 By doing this you can have a person who manages the master key
 separately under another password and the authorized users can use the
 encryption and signing secret subkeys without being able to make
 changes to them.

 The person who manages the master key can add new UIDs for the any new
 user and give that person a copy of the secret subkeys with the
 password.  The only problem that I see right away is revoking control
 when one of the users leaves.  One way that you could remedy this is
 to revoke the old subkeys and issue new ones.

 I am not recommending this method but it is a way that it can be done.

 Anyway...

 Cheers,

 -Paul

 --
 PGP: 3DB6D884

Wow, that would be a lot of work.  Actually, I didn't even know you could do
that.  GPG is versatile, to say the least.

Dave
PGP: 96569433



___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Cyberjack go plus new internal storage size

[tux . tsndcb]

Hello all,

Just for information, it seems than ReinerSCT have change internal storage size 
from 2 Go to 4 Go.

Best Regards

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

using different encryption key in evolution

[Richard Ulrich]

I realize, this question is more related to evolution than gpg directly,
but people here might know better than in an evolution mailing list
(which I'm not subscribed anyway).

Suppose a company has a mail address that is distributed among a group
of employees. E.g. if I send a mail to sa...@compa.ny that mail is
forwarded to al...@compa.ny and b...@compa.ny.

Now I want to send an encrypted mail to sa...@compa.ny, but there is no
gpg key to that address. Instead I find keys for some people that will
finally get the mail. 

Is there a way in evolution to explicitly state which encryption keys to
use?
Judging from the gpg manpage, it could be done on the commandline, but
that would be difficult to then send as a regular email, I guess.

Rgds
Richard


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users