Re: [Announce] GnuPG 2.1.1 released
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:54, dominyktil...@gmail.com said: I'm still hitting a new one though. If you attempt to compile using an external gpg-agent, rather than one with the package, you hit this: You mean an option --disable-agent? Do we still have this option - it needs to be removed. gpg-agent is not optional. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [Announce] GnuPG 2.1.1 released
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 22:21, 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net said: Could there be a similar issue with the %i for --photo-viewer? photo-viewer path\to\gpgview.exe %i /title 0x%K.%t[%V] I don't see any chnage in this part of the code. Did it worked in 2.0? Can you test on Unix too? (Debugging there is much easier for me). Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [Announce] GnuPG 2.1.1 released
Running Fedora 21, 64 bit. ./configure gave error missing ksba Downloaded. ./configure gave libgpg-error is needed. # yum install --disablerepo=Dropbox libgpg-error Loaded plugins: langpacks Package libgpg-error-1.13-3.fc21.x86_64 already installed and latest version Nothing to do Circular error? regards On 16 December 2014 at 16:36, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote: Hello! The GnuPG Project is pleased to announce the availability of the second release of GnuPG modern: Version 2.1.1. The GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) is a complete and free implementation of the OpenPGP standard as defined by RFC-4880 and better known as PGP. GnuPG, also known as GPG, allows to encrypt and sign data and communication, features a versatile key management system as well as access modules for public key directories. GnuPG itself is a command line tool with features for easy integration with other applications. A wealth of frontend applications and libraries making use of GnuPG are available. Since version 2 GnuPG provides support for S/MIME and Secure Shell in addition to OpenPGP. GnuPG is Free Software (meaning that it respects your freedom). It can be freely used, modified and distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License. Three different versions of GnuPG are actively maintained: - GnuPG modern (2.1) is the latest development with a lot of new features. This announcement is about the first release of this version. - GnuPG stable (2.0) is the current stable version for general use. This is what most users are currently using. - GnuPG classic (1.4) is the old standalone version which is most suitable for older or embedded platforms. You may not install modern (2.1) and stable (2.0) at the same time. However, it is possible to install classic (1.4) along with any of the other versions. What's New in GnuPG-2.1 === * gpg: Detect faulty use of --verify on detached signatures. * gpg: New import option keep-ownertrust. * gpg: New sub-command factory-reset for --card-edit. * gpg: A stub key for smartcards is now created by --card-status. * gpg: Fixed regression in --refresh-keys. * gpg: Fixed regresion in %g and %p codes for --sig-notation. * gpg: Fixed best matching hash algo detection for ECDSA and EdDSA. * gpg: Improved perceived speed of secret key listisngs. * gpg: Print number of skipped PGP-2 keys on import. * gpg: Removed the option aliases --throw-keyid and --notation-data; use --throw-keyids and --set-notation instead. * gpg: New import option keep-ownertrust. * gpg: Skip too large keys during import. * gpg,gpgsm: New option --no-autostart to avoid starting gpg-agent or dirmngr. * gpg-agent: New option --extra-socket to provide a restricted command set for use with remote clients. * gpgconf --kill does not anymore start a service only to kill it. * gpg-pconnect-agent: Add convenience option --uiserver. * Fixed keyserver access for Windows. * Fixed build problems on Mac OS X * The Windows installer does now install development files * More translations (but most of them are not complete). * To support remotely mounted home directories, the IPC sockets may now be redirected. This feature requires Libassuan 2.2.0. * Improved portability and the usual bunch of bug fixes. A detailed description of the changes found in 2.1 can be found at https://gnupg.org/faq/whats-new-in-2.1.html . Getting the Software Please follow the instructions found at https://gnupg.org/download/ or read on: GnuPG 2.1.1 may be downloaded from one of the GnuPG mirror sites or direct from its primary FTP server. The list of mirrors can be found at https://gnupg.org/mirrors.html . Note that GnuPG is not available at ftp.gnu.org. On ftp.gnupg.org you find these files: ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/gnupg/gnupg-2.1.1.tar.bz2 (4689k) ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/gnupg/gnupg-2.1.1.tar.bz2.sig This is the GnuPG 2.1 source code compressed using BZIP2 and its OpenPGP signature. ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/binary/gnupg-w32-2.1.1_20141216.exe (6364k) ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/binary/gnupg-w32-2.1.1_20141216.exe.sig This is an *experimental* installer for Windows including GPA as graphical key manager and GpgEX as an Explorer extension. Please de-install an already installed Gpg4win version before trying this installer. This binary version has not been tested very well, thus it is likely that you will run into problems. The complete source code for the software included in this installer is in the same directory with .exe replaced by .tar.xz. This version fixes a lot of bugs found after the release of 2.1.0 but there are still known bugs which we are working on. Please check the mailing list archives and https://wiki.gnupg.org for known problems and workaround. Checking the Integrity == In order to check
Refreshing private key
My current key is 2048 bits in length and I would like to have something that is closer to 8192 bits in length. Is there a way that I can accomplish this without revoking my key so that I can keep the same public key id? Any preferred RTFMing you can point me to? Thanks Wayland ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [Announce] GnuPG 2.1.1 released
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:59, dave.paw...@gmail.com said: ./configure gave libgpg-error is needed. configure shows you which version of which libaries you need. Please install them. The versions which come with your OS are usually too old. Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Refreshing private key
My current key is 2048 bits in length and I would like to have something that is closer to 8192 bits in length. Is there a way that I can accomplish this... Definitely not from GnuPG, and probably not from without it, either. GnuPG is capped at 4096 bits (for good reasons). Further, you cannot change the length of the primary subkey on a certificate. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
RE: Unable to encrypt file with private/public key
Hi,
Thanks for your response.
About the below command, it's asking for passphrase whereas my requirement is
to use only keys to encrypt/sign it.
gpg2 -u FFEEDDCC -r AABBCCDD -se supersecret.txt
I tried below command which shows confirmation screen where I have entered y
(yes) now able to see a file named supersecret.txt.gpg. m not sure what file
it is because it think encrypted file should has an .asc extension.
./gpg --encrypt --hidden-recipient AABBCCDD supersecret.txt
gpg: 89709B71: There is no assurance this key belongs to the named user
Regards,
Dhiraj
-Original Message-
From: Gnupg-users [mailto:gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org] On Behalf Of Duplicity
Mailing List
Sent: 17 December 2014 23:03
To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Subject: Re: Unable to encrypt file with private/public key
On 17/12/14 14:43, Haritwal, Dhiraj wrote:
Hi,
I am using gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.7 trying to encrypt a file with private
key whose public key I have shared to the partner who have to decrypt
this file. I tried with --armour -symmetric switches which requires a
passphrase to encrypt but I have requirement to encrypt it through
private/public key. If I am using -encrypt --hidden-recipient option
showing below error. I am able to see the public key while running
-list-keys option. I am running it on AIX 6.1 under root user.
If you just wish to encrypt, not sign, to the user, use:-
gpg2 --recipient AABBCCDD --encrypt supersecret.txt
Or the shorter version:-
gpg2 -r AABBCCDD -e supersecret.txt
It will dump supersecret.txt.gpg, that's your encrypted file. This isn't signed
(I.E. the receiver won't be able to verify _you_ sent it, and can be replaced
(Although not read) in transit). If you wish to sign it, you'll also need a GPG
key in your keyring, then run:-
gpg2 --local-user FFEEDDCC --recipient AABBCCDD --encrypt --sign
supersecret.txt
Or the shorter version:-
gpg2 -u FFEEDDCC -r AABBCCDD -se supersecret.txt
Where FFEEDDCC is your key identifier and AABBCCDD is the recipient's key
identifier. When they decrypt the file, they will see something along the lines
of:-
gpg: Good signature from John Doe (john...@example.com) [ultimate]
gpg: binary signature, digest algorithm SHA512
gpg: decryption okay
the command you're using, --symmetric, is for using a passphrase for
encryption/decrypt (I.E. symmetric encryption, not asymmetric).
--hidden-recipient should work too, and is used if you don't wish to include
information about the recipient in the gpg file, you probably don't want to use
this option (As oppose to --recipient) unless you really do wish to use the
features it provides.
As for the failed public key, may I ask the exact command you're running? I get
the same error message when I specify a recipient that doesn't exist:-
$ gpg2 -e -r ${RANDOM} b
gpg: 31546: skipped: No public key
gpg: b: encryption failed: No public key
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or
entity named above and may contain information that is privileged. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error, please notify us immediately by return email or
telephone and destroy the original message. - This mail is sent via Sony Asia
Pacific Mail Gateway..
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
RE: Unable to encrypt file with private/public key
On 12/18/2014 at 10:38 AM, Dhiraj Haritwal dhiraj.harit...@ap.sony.com wrote: About the below command, it's asking for passphrase whereas my requirement is to use only keys to encrypt/sign it. gpg2 -u FFEEDDCC -r AABBCCDD -se supersecret.txt - '-s' in the above command means that you want to sign. Whenever you want to sign, GnuPG asks for your passphrase to unlock your signing key. = I tried below command which shows confirmation screen where I have entered y (yes) now able to see a file named supersecret.txt.gpg. m not sure what file it is because it think encrypted file should has an .asc extension. ./gpg --encrypt --hidden-recipient AABBCCDD supersecret.txt - 'supersecret.txt.gpg' is the GnuPG encrypted output of the file 'supersecret.txt'. If unspecified, GnuPG will produce a .gpg file rather than a .asc file. If you want a .asc file, you need to include the option of '--armor' or '-a' in your encryption command: gpg2 -u FFEEDDCC -r AABBCCDD -a -e supersecret.txt vedaal ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Unable to encrypt file with private/public key
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:39, dhiraj.harit...@ap.sony.com said: gpg2 -u FFEEDDCC -r AABBCCDD -se supersecret.txt You asked to sign (-s) and thus it has to ask for the passphrase (unless you key is not protected by a passphrase). I tried below command which shows confirmation screen where I have entered y (yes) now able to see a file named supersecret.txt.gpg. m not sure what file it is because it think encrypted file should has an .asc extension. If you want it ascii armored (which defaults to the .asc suffix) you need to give the option --armor (or -a). Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Unable to encrypt file with private/public key
On 18/12/14 15:39, Haritwal, Dhiraj wrote: Hi, Thanks for your response. About the below command, it's asking for passphrase whereas my requirement is to use only keys to encrypt/sign it. gpg2 -u FFEEDDCC -r AABBCCDD -se supersecret.txt I tried below command which shows confirmation screen where I have entered y (yes) now able to see a file named supersecret.txt.gpg. m not sure what file it is because it think encrypted file should has an .asc extension. ./gpg --encrypt --hidden-recipient AABBCCDD supersecret.txt gpg: 89709B71: There is no assurance this key belongs to the named user Regards, Dhiraj .gpg is the extension of encrypted files, .asc is normally ASCII armored files (Signatures and the like), if you'd like to generate one of those, look into the -a option (for Ascii). A complete command would look something like `gpg2 -u AABBCCDD -as supersecret.txt`. The generated supersecret.txt.asc will only verify to someone who already has the .txt that it hasn't been touched/modified and that the key AABBCCDD did verify it as being legitimate, they won't be able to extrapolate supersecret.txt out of it. It's _only_ for signing, _not_ for encrypting/transportation of data, which is why you often see them on this mailing list and downloads (You want to verify that the user sent the data, but not encrypt it (Since it's public)). If you try to run:- gpg -d supersecret.txt.gpg It should tell you it's encrypted and the destination public key, then error out (As it's not destined for you). As for the There is no assurance this key belongs to thhe named user, this is because you haven't trusted them yet. If you do trust the key as being the key they claim to be, and have verified the key through out-of-bands means (I.E. Not over the internet, or using an already secure channel over the internet, this is *not* emails, this is *not* Skype, this is *not* text messages), then you can take a look at this:- https://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual/x334.html P.S. I'm replying to you on-list for the reasons:- 1. People are able to verify if I say anything stupid 2. In the case I haven't said anything stupid, someone else could also learn from this (I.E. Location this thread in the future via a search engine). I recommend you do the same. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Unable to encrypt file with private/public key
On 18/12/14 16:04, Duplicity Mailing List wrote: It's _only_ for signing, _not_ for encrypting/transportation of data Ignore all of this. I made a huge mistake, apparently you can encrypt data and store it in the ASCII files, I have no idea why I thought you couldn't, it's so logical that you can, all it is doing is storing bytes as ASCII, it's just I've never seen it in use so I never connected the dots until I read vedaal's message. What I'm trying to say is:- .asc can be used for encrypted connect, albeit probably not recommending if you're sending large files, just as much as it can be used for signatures. Signatures are to verify the content hasn't been modified, encryption is to verify that only the recipient can read the data, and encrypt+sign is to verify the data hasn't been modified and the recipient is the only one who can read it. There we go, sorry for the mistake, I feel very stupid right about now. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Refreshing private key
On 12/18/2014 10:24 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: My current key is 2048 bits in length and I would like to have something that is closer to 8192 bits in length. Is there a way that I can accomplish this... Definitely not from GnuPG, and probably not from without it, either. There are clearly tools that you can use to make larger keys than 4096-bit RSA, e.g. gnutls-bin + monkeysphere: certtool -p --bits 8192 | pem2openpgp 'Test User t...@example.org' (this will produce a binary-formatted OpenPGP key on stdout, so you probably want to send it to a file or something) but I don't recommend trying to do this, because these larger RSA keys are expensive to use compared to the marginal extra security, and their signatures are large. I recommend sticking with 4096-bit RSA for now; for stronger keys you'll eventually want to move to a large ECC key (though the choices we have at the moment for ECC have some shadow of suspicion over them). Further, you cannot change the length of the primary subkey on a certificate. primary subkey doesn't make much sense. I'm pretty sure Robert means primary key. --dkg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [Announce] GnuPG 2.1.1 released
On Thursday 18 December 2014 10:59:09 Dave Pawson wrote: Running Fedora 21, 64 bit. ./configure gave error missing ksba Downloaded. ./configure gave libgpg-error is needed. # yum install --disablerepo=Dropbox libgpg-error Loaded plugins: langpacks Package libgpg-error-1.13-3.fc21.x86_64 already installed and latest version Nothing to do Circular error? I guess you are lacking the development package of libgpg-error. It's probably called libgpg-error-devel. Whenever you want to build something yourself you have to install the development packages of all dependencies. Normal users don't need them. Therefore they are usually not installed by default. Regards, Ingo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Refreshing private key
primary subkey doesn't make much sense. I'm pretty sure Robert means primary key. Sorry, a little bit of inside baseball there [1]. tl;dr version -- Daniel's right. Longer version follows. At work I'm twiddling about with an OpenPGP parser and for various reasons you really don't want me to get into, the class that defines primary keys is a subclass of the class that defines subkeys. It seems backwards, but needs to be that way to preserve Liskov substitutability. As a result, I wind up talking about primary subkeys because in my head I'm talking about the PrimarySubkey class. :) [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inside_baseball_%28metaphor%29 ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
latest version build error
Hi, I'm trying to build the latest version of gnupgp from the git repo, but I'm encountering a problem while compiling it. It all compiles fine up until logging.c. gcc-g -O2 -O3 -Wall -Wcast-align -Wshadow -Wstrict-prototypes -Wformat -Wno-format-y2k -Wformat-security -W -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign -Wpointer-arith -o t-stringhelp t-stringhelp.o t-support.o libcommon.a -lgcrypt -lassuan -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -lgpg-error -L/usr/local/lib -lgpg-error libcommon.a(libcommon_a-logging.o): In function `set_file_fd': gnupg/common/logging.c:449: undefined reference to `gpgrt_fclose' gnupg/common/logging.c:457: undefined reference to `_gpgrt_get_std_stream' gnupg/common/logging.c:457: undefined reference to `gpgrt_fileno' gnupg/common/logging.c:516: undefined reference to `gpgrt_fopencookie' gnupg/common/logging.c:523: undefined reference to `gpgrt_setvbuf' gnupg/common/logging.c:521: undefined reference to `_gpgrt_get_std_stream' [.] From a Google search, gpgrt_fclose, for example, is in libgpg-error. # strings -a /usr/local/lib/libgpg-error.so.0 | grep 'gpgrt_fclose' gpgrt_fclose gpgrt_fclose_snatch _gpgrt_fclose_snatch _gpgrt_fclose _gpgrt_fclose _gpgrt_fclose_snatch gpgrt_fclose_snatch gpgrt_fclose I run: # ./configure --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --enable-maintainer-mode --with-libgpg-error-prefix=/usr/local which outputs no errors, and this info: GnuPG v2.1.2 has been configured as follows: Revision: 5cb6df8 (23734) Platform: GNU/Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) OpenPGP: yes S/MIME:yes Agent: yes Smartcard: yes G13: yes Dirmngr: yes Gpgtar:yes Protect tool: (default) LDAP wrapper: (default) Default agent: (default) Default pinentry: (default) Default scdaemon: (default) Default dirmngr: (default) Dirmngr auto start: yes Readline support:yes LDAP support:yes DNS SRV support: yes TLS support: gnutls Any suggestions? P.S: Please CC me, as I'm not subscribed to this list. Thanks, -- -- Joshua Rogers https://internot.info/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Installation
I can't install. Please help root@server1:/var/www/gnupg-2.0.26# ./configure bash: ./configure: Permission denied root@server1:/var/www/gnupg-2.0.26# chmod -R 777 * root@server1:/var/www/gnupg-2.0.26# ./configure checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu configure: autobuild project... gnupg configure: autobuild revision... 2.0.26 configure: autobuild hostname... server1 configure: autobuild timestamp... 20141218-193017 checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking for gcc... no checking for cc... no checking for cl.exe... no configure: error: in `/var/www/gnupg-2.0.26': configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH See `config.log' for more details ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [Announce] GnuPG 2.1.1 released
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thursday 18 December 2014 at 9:03:45 AM, in mid:87388d5nym@vigenere.g10code.de, Werner Koch wrote: I don't see any chnage in this part of the code. Did it worked in 2.0? I had not used 2.0 much at all because my email app of choice doesn't play nice with it (but is fine with 2.1). I have 2.0.20 and 2.0.26 to hand; I just tested with them and found it didn't work for me. For both of these, the error message was slightly different than I see with 2.1:- gpg: system error while calling external program: Permission denied gpg: unable to display photo ID! ^ instead of:- gpg: system error while calling external program: No error gpg: unable to display photo ID! Can you test on Unix too? (Debugging there is much easier for me). The best I can do is try to get my Linux partition working again, if the wife doesn't invent too much that needs doing over Christmas. - -- Best regards MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net After all is said and done, a lot more will be said than done. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUk0wwXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCM0FFN0VDQTlBOEM4QjMwMjZBNUEwRjU2 QjdDNzRDRUIzMUYyNUYwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXwZc8IAIEkdqDjV5WK7Y6cHZF2Vi54 JCDD0U1set5Cs0nczv7jFTXAI15JIsw5brWRcPlKzDM4uBwNgnhFBC5Arr4f/UHB 2Yd1cmaGFE90ArQ4j9resAZ6Pv0MIvbvL3GwL/kvUAU6gPAqS72PlO9dyafmIbYz id6xDJCwOpJFT5XVYSAThJ2n/+Ao4KuOMsPqt9sU1QdSMNJwKS7MUdFil/85AK1p kIW7I/sIK+sLYwrvDIon3T8V/Za/eMeJVjM8AgD1A7pNbynh161hV9bH+GHXNGxC GkM1Kbj4ufK0dkow9ZEhwKeQnG7wx8Y+bcUoFJ9KNIorfEke/wU+b3ZQP87DrSuI vgQBFgoAZgUCVJNMOF8UgAAuAChpc3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVu cGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MzNBQ0VENEVFOTEzNEVFQkRFNkE4NTA2MTcx MkJDNDYxQUY3NzhFNAAKCRAXErxGGvd45LljAQCATOKlAtFkQd+KRGSeO4QLj/HR PXMd+g/TcollLscJNQEATn+VQZ6opqQZxDvtAewoqSRSYLGBETmzJhKiA0Wjgw8= =GTud -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: latest version build error
On 12/18/2014 05:14 AM, Joshua Rogers wrote: I'm trying to build the latest version of gnupgp from the git repo, but I'm encountering a problem while compiling it. I think you mean gnupg, not gnupgp :) libcommon.a(libcommon_a-logging.o): In function `set_file_fd': gnupg/common/logging.c:449: undefined reference to `gpgrt_fclose' gnupg/common/logging.c:457: undefined reference to `_gpgrt_get_std_stream' gnupg/common/logging.c:457: undefined reference to `gpgrt_fileno' gnupg/common/logging.c:516: undefined reference to `gpgrt_fopencookie' gnupg/common/logging.c:523: undefined reference to `gpgrt_setvbuf' gnupg/common/logging.c:521: undefined reference to `_gpgrt_get_std_stream' [.] From a Google search, gpgrt_fclose, for example, is in libgpg-error. You don't mention what platform you're on, but given your recent reports in the debian BTS, i think you're using debian. The package you're probably looking for is libgpg-error-dev. hth, --dkg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Installation
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 09:34:40AM -0500, realhost...@safe-mail.net wrote: I can't install. Please help root@server1:/var/www/gnupg-2.0.26# ./configure bash: ./configure: Permission denied root@server1:/var/www/gnupg-2.0.26# chmod -R 777 * root@server1:/var/www/gnupg-2.0.26# ./configure checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu configure: autobuild project... gnupg configure: autobuild revision... 2.0.26 configure: autobuild hostname... server1 configure: autobuild timestamp... 20141218-193017 checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking for gcc... no checking for cc... no checking for cl.exe... no configure: error: in `/var/www/gnupg-2.0.26': configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH See `config.log' for more details Hi, A compiler cannot be found. Do you have a C compiler installed? If so, which compiler (and operating system?) If not, you could install `gcc' and try again. Cheers, Fraser pgpz03dUJx1v4.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: latest version build error
On 12/19/2014 01:35 AM, Joshua Rogers wrote: On 19/12/14 09:20, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: You don't mention what platform you're on, but given your recent reports in the debian BTS, i think you're using debian. The package you're probably looking for is libgpg-error-dev. I'm using ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/libgpg-error/libgpg-error-1.17.tar.gz , but still to no avail. Is that the right package? how is it installed? if you're using debian testing or unstable, it's probably best to just do: apt-get install libgpg-error-dev --dkg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
