RE: Unable to encrypt file with private/public key
Almost done now. After I signed partner’s public key, that warring has gone. I am using below command to encrypt file with my private key partner’s public key partner is using my private key their public key to decrypt it but it’s getting fail. M I using anything wrong here. ./gpg --local-user 'MY USER’ --recipient partner_pubkey --encrypt --armor /tmp/test/data1.CSV Tried to use --sign which is asking passphrase which don’t want to use. Can we sign without passphrase only with public/private key. Dhiraj From: Pete Stephenson [mailto:p...@heypete.com] Sent: 23 December 2014 11:24 To: Haritwal, Dhiraj Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org Subject: RE: Unable to encrypt file with private/public key On Dec 22, 2014 7:30 AM, Haritwal, Dhiraj dhiraj.harit...@ap.sony.commailto:dhiraj.harit...@ap.sony.com wrote: Thank you very much for all the explanation/links. Now things are bit clear. Now I have to encrypt file with partner's Public Key. I tried with below command which is still showing warning message (gpg: 89709B71: There is no assurance this key belongs to the named user) whereas if I am checking partner_pubkey, it's showing full trust. How can I remove this message. Even I have added partner's public key as trusted. ./gpg --encrypt --recipient partner_pubkey --armor /tmp/test/data.CSV I'm glad things are working better. To resolve the issue with the assurance message, manually verify that the key belongs to the recipient (e.g. meet in person or call them and verify the fingerprint of their key) and then sign the key using GnuPG. (gpg --sign-key 0xKEYID) In GnuPG you vouch that a particular public key belongs to a person (or organization) by signing their public key. This signature can be local or published publicly. Trust in GnuPG is different, and reflects how much you trust the other key to correctly vouch for the identity of others. If you set their key as fully trusted, keys that are signed by that key are treated by your copy of GnuPG with the same level of assurance as if you signed them yourself. Typically this should only be reserved for people you know to always check the identity of other people thoroughly and correctly before signing their keys. The default is for trust to be set to marginal. By combining signatures and trust, one forms a web of trust: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_of_trust Cheers! -Pete This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original message. - This mail is sent via Sony Asia Pacific Mail Gateway.. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Guys please all see
Guys please all see http://media.ccc.de/browse/congress/2014/31c3_-_6258_-_en_-_saal_1_-_201412282030_-_reconstructing_narratives_-_jacob_-_laura_poitras.html#video to understand the important role, GPG plays. Support us, please! ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Issue: unknown armor header: \x09Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 5:41 AM, pkalluru pkall...@ebay.com wrote: *unknown armor header: \x09Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)* 0x09 is a tab character. That sounds like a whitespace error. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Gnupg-users Digest, Vol 135, Issue 42
partner's public key as trusted. ./gpg --encrypt --recipient partner_pubkey --armor /tmp/test/data.CSV I'm glad things are working better. To resolve the issue with the assurance message, manually verify that the key belongs to the recipient (e.g. meet in person or call them and verify the fingerprint of their key) and then sign the key using GnuPG. (gpg --sign-key 0xKEYID) In GnuPG you vouch that a particular public key belongs to a person (or organization) by signing their public key. This signature can be local or published publicly. Trust in GnuPG is different, and reflects how much you trust the other key to correctly vouch for the identity of others. If you set their key as fully trusted, keys that are signed by that key are treated by your copy of GnuPG with the same level of assurance as if you signed them yourself. Typically this should only be reserved for people you know to always check the identity of other people thoroughly and correctly before signing their keys. The default is for trust to be set to marginal. By combining signatures and trust, one forms a web of trust: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_of_trust Cheers! -Pete This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original message. - This mail is sent via Sony Asia Pacific Mail Gateway.. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /pipermail/attachments/20141229/183a0715/attachment.html -- Subject: Digest Footer ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users -- End of Gnupg-users Digest, Vol 135, Issue 42 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Guys please all see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Monday 29 December 2014 at 2:01:34 AM, in mid:54a0b5fe.9090...@enigmail.net, n...@enigmail.net wrote: Guys please all see http://media.ccc.de/browse/congress/2014/31c3_-_6258_-_en_-_saal_1_-_201412282030_-_reconstructing_narratives_-_jacob_-_laura_poitras.html#video to understand the important role, GPG plays. I'm not entirely sure how this relates to the thread in which you posted it. - -- Best regards MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net You can't build a reputation on what you are going to do -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUoejzXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCM0FFN0VDQTlBOEM4QjMwMjZBNUEwRjU2 QjdDNzRDRUIzMUYyNUYwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXwFcAH/RcqKRDPHKvKnd8CMAP464+h zv4LjC/MGHlqy4Pd6CeMedfhQc2MkK+Dlh30eCAQAG85AmDy030jjIYq2IaXwb0a 2qdQpCbR12viXJdcFqzU2U/1r4D9E0kuYVT83mOZ+3+3ULjeALGES+5+kn/k7XRy koT39mBUIrNNxnF8H2QvMddmdgie+ItLyFLt0R9b/3wuGa6WnnGhNI/PECegVkH9 rRwXn36GCpK3NkEP80ZLxeWPGBCknIJGnZtDSH0E1o0mfJADKSbAcOq8VeLcJhuN 4A5O1dQKwZXgilIbwHdSpBWH2VP8puLqfV98av0ml5tMbZZOa8m1KSd1SvxL98eI vgQBFgoAZgUCVKHo818UgAAuAChpc3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVu cGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MzNBQ0VENEVFOTEzNEVFQkRFNkE4NTA2MTcx MkJDNDYxQUY3NzhFNAAKCRAXErxGGvd45L7/AQBxPJEXpAljQhxWVGhqSSC8PR6D xvOJrBkq+l6UFH/R3wEACri0zAYTJ1hgAiw/CXnEbJnnWFBlnDA4+zwujzz6aQg= =aaDG -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
MOOC's
https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/introduction-to-cyber-security Starting shortly, free Open course on cyber security. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
