Re: [admin] postings from non-subscribers
The flip side is someone who wants a quick answer to a limited issue but otherwise has no interest in participating in (or using email rules to filter out) every single conversation on a given topic. Personally, I clicked one of the reply-to addresses in the archive from a google search, wrote a message, got a notice that it was being moderated, and then decided to sign up. If I had been told my message was rejected because I wasn't a subscriber, I might not have bothered going any further. Barriers to entry should be reduced not reinforced imo. More kudos to the admins! - Cog On 11/7/2016 12:47 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > On 07.11.16 19:06, Werner Koch wrote: > >> Our mailing list admins are moderating posts from non-subscribed >> posters. For many years they are doing this without getting much >> attention - time for a big KUDOS to them. > That's quite unusual. Thanks to the list admins for their work. Still, > I personally (!) don't think there is any need to accommodate non- > subscribers. The whole notion of "I want information but cannot be > bothered to subscribe" rubs me the wrong way. > > -Ralph > > ___ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [admin] postings from non-subscribers
> The only time inline responses make any sense at all is when there are > multiple separate points to respond to... Or when the list owners have specifically requested it be done, as is the case here. http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/75846 (Although my comment is first in that thread, I'm not the list owner. wk chimes in a few comments into the thread: his opinion is the authoritative one.) ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [admin] postings from non-subscribers
What's annoying is when you're subscribed to a list and receiving posts, but for some reason when you try to post, it says you're not subscribed and getting moderated. I've had that happen, but I don't think it's happened here yet. On Nov 7, 2016 12:48 PM, "Ralph Seichter"wrote: > On 07.11.16 19:06, Werner Koch wrote: > > > Our mailing list admins are moderating posts from non-subscribed > > posters. For many years they are doing this without getting much > > attention - time for a big KUDOS to them. > > That's quite unusual. Thanks to the list admins for their work. Still, > I personally (!) don't think there is any need to accommodate non- > subscribers. The whole notion of "I want information but cannot be > bothered to subscribe" rubs me the wrong way. > > -Ralph > > ___ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users > ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [admin] postings from non-subscribers
Top posting is easier for some, bottom posting for others. Also, a sane mda will show all new messages at the bottom, meaning you see the previous messages above the current message. Leaving the full quote in for those who aren't using a sane mda to be able to read through and find previous messages, indented to show threading, is a matter of courtesy. The only time inline responses make any sense at all is when there are multiple separate points to respond to, and the only time a bottom post makes sense is when you want your recipients to have to scroll through the previous context *twice*, and get annoyed. On Nov 7, 2016 1:24 PM, "Ralph Seichter"wrote: > On 07.11.16 21:59, Schlacta, Christ wrote: > > > What's annoying is when you're subscribed to a list and receiving > > posts, but for some reason when you try to post, it says you're not > > subscribed and getting moderated. > > Used the wrong address to post? Anyway, speaking of annoying things: > top-posting and full quotes come to mind. :-) > > -Ralph > > > ___ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users > ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Defense strategy against basic DoS on key servers
Hello, The pool of key servers looks like a central element of the OpenPGP global WoT and key synchronization across people. I wonder what is the defense strategy of this pool against 2 very basic DoS attacks. The first attack would be to just upload several To of keys to fulfill the available storage of these servers. The second attack scenario would target a specific key by attaching to it a huge number of signatures that would make it very hard for anyone to download or refresh the targeted key. Thank for helping me to understand how those scenarios are managed. Piotr Chmielnicki @piotrcki ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [admin] postings from non-subscribers
On 11/7/2016 2:47 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > On 07.11.16 19:06, Werner Koch wrote: > >> Our mailing list admins are moderating posts from non-subscribed >> posters. For many years they are doing this without getting much >> attention - time for a big KUDOS to them. > > That's quite unusual. Thanks to the list admins for their work. Still, > I personally (!) don't think there is any need to accommodate non- > subscribers. The whole notion of "I want information but cannot be > bothered to subscribe" rubs me the wrong way. I tend to feel the same way. I've never understood that mentality. I mean, it literally takes less than a minute to subscribe then less than another to unsubscribe. You really want information but it's not worth two-minutes of your time to get it? Must not be really important to you then. Still, their willingness to moderate non-subscribers shows how much our moderators rock. Most mailing list I belong to would never do this. This sets our mods apart! Great job guys. Anthony ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [admin] postings from non-subscribers
On 07.11.16 22:52, Schlacta, Christ wrote: > Top posting is easier for some, bottom posting for others. It is not about what is "easier for some", but I am not going to spend more time discussing Netiquette with you. We have been doing things in a certain way in mailing lists - since the 1980s - for good reasons. -Ralph ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Question about using GnuPG on Windows 10
I know Windows 10 sends a lot of telemetry data back to Microsoft for analysis. The data sent to Microsoft, in some circumstances, also seems to be keystroke data to help make certain features of Windows 10 better. How does GnuPG play into this? Is there any evidence that GnuPG password entry is not part of the keystroke data sent to Microsoft? Does GnuPG take any steps to avoid this? Can it? Thanks, Anthony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [admin] postings from non-subscribers
On 07.11.16 21:59, Schlacta, Christ wrote: > What's annoying is when you're subscribed to a list and receiving > posts, but for some reason when you try to post, it says you're not > subscribed and getting moderated. Used the wrong address to post? Anyway, speaking of annoying things: top-posting and full quotes come to mind. :-) -Ralph ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [admin] postings from non-subscribers
On 07.11.16 19:06, Werner Koch wrote: > Our mailing list admins are moderating posts from non-subscribed > posters. For many years they are doing this without getting much > attention - time for a big KUDOS to them. That's quite unusual. Thanks to the list admins for their work. Still, I personally (!) don't think there is any need to accommodate non- subscribers. The whole notion of "I want information but cannot be bothered to subscribe" rubs me the wrong way. -Ralph ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
[admin] postings from non-subscribers (was: gpg is destroying my messages)
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 13:28, gnupg...@seichter.de said: > If you are not subscribed, how did you post on this mailing list? That is easy. Our mailing list admins are moderating posts from non-subscribed posters. For many years they are doing this without getting much attention - time for a big KUDOS to them. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. pgpbXtv0xgIkp.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: gpg is destroying my messages ...
On Fri 2016-11-04 20:58:10 -0400, Wols Lists wrote: > Basically, I'm very frustrated that gpg is losing random emails of mine. > The problem is I am NOT using it by default, but every now and then it > will "grab" a message I send. I then can only access it by typing in my > pass-phrase. (And, iirc, the menu bar displays and says DON'T sign, > DON'T encrypt!!!) > > Why on earth - HOW on earth - is it encrypting messages without needing > my key? And why is it doing it? I need gpg for the odd message, but it's > a right royal pain when it does this as messages refuse to save in sent, > and I can't access emails I've sent without a load of grief. > > I can't even find out how to strip this blasted encryption from my own > messages so I can see them without problem! > > I'm using the gpg plug-in for thunderbird ... You probably want to ask this question on the enigmail mailing list: Enigmail user discussion listEnigmail is responsible for integrating GnuPG with Thunderbird. Regards, --dkg ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
gpg is destroying my messages ...
(Note I'm not subscribed, please cc me on replies) Basically, I'm very frustrated that gpg is losing random emails of mine. The problem is I am NOT using it by default, but every now and then it will "grab" a message I send. I then can only access it by typing in my pass-phrase. (And, iirc, the menu bar displays and says DON'T sign, DON'T encrypt!!!) Why on earth - HOW on earth - is it encrypting messages without needing my key? And why is it doing it? I need gpg for the odd message, but it's a right royal pain when it does this as messages refuse to save in sent, and I can't access emails I've sent without a load of grief. I can't even find out how to strip this blasted encryption from my own messages so I can see them without problem! I'm using the gpg plug-in for thunderbird ... Cheers, Wol ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: gpg is destroying my messages ...
> (Note I'm not subscribed, please cc me on replies) If you are not subscribed, how did you post on this mailing list? > Why on earth - HOW on earth - is it encrypting messages without > needing my key? GPG does not initiate encryption, your MUA (Thunderbird) does. Also, GPG does not require your own key, but the recipient's key for encryption. Unless you Bcc yourself or add a default encrypt-to-key in GPG settings, you won't even be able to read the encrypted message. > I'm using the gpg plug-in for thunderbird ... What is "the" plugin? Enigmail? In any case, check the plugin settings, GPG is not the root cause for your problems, the Thunderbird plugin calling GPG is. Change the plugin settings, or disable it. -Ralph P.S.: Please keep replies on-list. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users