Re: Counterarguments Supporting GnuPG over Off The Record (OTR)
Stephan, On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Stephan Beckwrote: > 15-20 years from now, OpenPGP will have expired and be a case of study > for computer historians. I doubt this as PGP was published ~25 years ago (on 5 June 1991) and has outlasted the modern operating system support to hardware manufactured in the 1990s. -- Regards, Christian Heinrich http://cmlh.id.au/contact ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: spr332 vs spr532
Hello, Elizabeth Ferdmanwrote: > I'm interning for the PGP Clean Room and am trying to get an OpenPGP > Card reader. Kernelconcepts is offering a SPR332 which is the successor > to the 532. According to this page, though, > > https://wiki.gnupg.org/CardReader/PinpadInput I wrote this page, when I added the support of pinpad input to scdaemon. > the 532 seems to be recommended but the 332 is not. I'm wondering if > there's a specific reason why it was left out and if I should go for the > 532 instead. Since Werner has SCM SPR 532, it was tested and listed. Please note that the list is not for recommendation (as of today); Vasco DigiPASS 920 (which I have) worked, but it only supports key length <= 1024-bit of RSA. Gnuk Token is listed, but it has no hardware pinpad, in fact. Some other readers were listed because they requires special handling to work around issues of their firmware. I think that: if you need a tested reader, go for the 532. If you have time and energy, go for the 332 and please let us know if it works or not. I guess that it is likely work well with PC/SC and we need a bit of change for the internal CCID driver of GnuPG. If it will work, I'll put it on the list. That will be a great contribution to GnuPG community. -- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
spr332 vs spr532
Hello, I'm interning for the PGP Clean Room and am trying to get an OpenPGP Card reader. Kernelconcepts is offering a SPR332 which is the successor to the 532. According to this page, though, https://wiki.gnupg.org/CardReader/PinpadInput the 532 seems to be recommended but the 332 is not. I'm wondering if there's a specific reason why it was left out and if I should go for the 532 instead. Thank you, Elizabeth signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Counterarguments Supporting GnuPG over Off The Record (OTR)
On 01/19/2017 04:06 AM, Stephan Beck wrote: > 15-20 years from now, OpenPGP will have expired and be a case of study > for computer historians. > I agree. 20 years from now, we will all be using telepathy, and the telephone and Internet will be redundant. Without electromagnetic communication, and without paper communication, we will be unable to encrypt anything. Will there be an equivalent to OpenPGP that works with telepathy? -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ PGP-Key:166D840A 0C610C8B Registered Machine 1935521. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jerseyhttp://linuxcounter.net ^^-^^ 11:10:01 up 8 days, 19:55, 3 users, load average: 5.18, 4.96, 4.87 ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Counterarguments Supporting GnuPG over Off The Record (OTR)
> 15-20 years from now, OpenPGP will have expired and be a case of study > for computer historians. Maybe. So what? 15-20 years from now many of us will have expired and only be of interest to our families. Everything dies. That doesn't make things less valuable. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Counterarguments Supporting GnuPG over Off The Record (OTR)
Nice to have a clairvoyant and soothsayer in this mailing list. Would you dare to make a similar statement on the fate of windows or Linux? :) Bernhard Am 19.01.2017 um 10:06 schrieb Stephan Beck: > 15-20 years from now, OpenPGP will have expired and be a case of study > for computer historians. > > Christian Heinrich: >> https://www.foo.be/2016/12/OpenPGP-really-works outlines a number of >> counter-arguments in support of GnuPG over OTR chat app and other >> alternatives. >> > ___ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users -- spitzhalde9 D-79853 lenzkirch bernhard.kle...@gmx.net www.b-kleine.com, www.urseetal.net - thunderbird mit enigmail GPG schlüssel: D5257409 fingerprint: 08 B7 F8 70 22 7A FC C1 15 49 CA A6 C7 6F A0 2E D5 25 74 09 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Counterarguments Supporting GnuPG over Off The Record (OTR)
15-20 years from now, OpenPGP will have expired and be a case of study for computer historians. Christian Heinrich: > https://www.foo.be/2016/12/OpenPGP-really-works outlines a number of > counter-arguments in support of GnuPG over OTR chat app and other > alternatives. > ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users