(OT) encrypting to expired certificates

2014-09-18 Thread Peter Lebbing
On 17/09/14 22:46, michaelquig...@theway.org wrote:
 The discussion has been most entertaining and enlightening.

And to think I blew a gasket because I grossly misinterpreted this sentence:

 As a farm kid, the answer is a resounding yes, and you should be
 thanking me.

Which I interpreted as that /I/ should throw out food that's past its expiration
date. And that I should thank Robert for showing me the error of my ways, which
is the part that got me fuming. And was a completely wrong interpretation!

Well, people, you are welcome for the entertainment! I hope I actually made a
few good points as well :).

Peter.

-- 
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy.
My key is available at http://digitalbrains.com/2012/openpgp-key-peter

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: (OT) encrypting to expired certificates

2014-09-18 Thread Robert J. Hansen
 And to think I blew a gasket because I grossly misinterpreted this sentence:

To clarify:

I think that the body politic should thank producers of food for being
willing to throw away food (and thus, profit) in the interests of
preserving the safety of the public's food supply.  That's all.

The reason why I find the metaphor appropriate for GnuPG is because it
highlights the different responsibilities producers have versus
consumers.  A producer is expected to provide product (food, encrypted
communications, whatever) that exceeds the standard of the consumer.

Similarly, the use case of I forgot to add a new expiration date on my
own key is different from the use case of my correspondent forgot to
add a new expiration date on his key.  These two use cases revolve
around policy, not mechanism.  In the former, whether you want to hack
up the system time to get around the expiration issue is wholly your
lookout -- whatever policy one decides, I neither get to judge it nor
comment on it.  In the latter, I get to say, I cannot imagine a world
where this makes sense.  The certificate has expired; don't use it.

Again, producers are -- must be -- held to a higher standard than consumers.

Peter, I hope this makes my feelings on the matter clear.  It was not my
intent to tell you how to run your refrigerator, or that you are somehow
doing it incorrectly.

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: (Really OT!) encrypting to expired certificates

2014-09-16 Thread Robert J. Hansen
 However, I can't help but feel angry by your dismissal of my beliefs

I did not dismiss your beliefs, nor did I mock them.  When I said in
deference to Peter's hot-button issue of food expiration, there was no
perjoration or sarcasm attached to that.  I said precisely, exactly,
what I meant: in order to avoid tromping on something that is a
sensitive subject for you, I elected to use other examples.  You may
wish to rethink whether that amounts to a dismissal of your beliefs or
consideration of them.

 But even if you are of stone, maybe you should remember that it's 
 actual people you are conversing with who have emotions and might 
 feel strongly about things.

We are not our ideas.  Our ideas are separate things from us, and one
can be a virtuous and commendable soul even if one's notions are
nonsense.  A Young-Earth Creationist who volunteers to feed the hungry
is still showing great personal virtue.  Their idea may be flamingly
wrong, but only a heartless fool would think that fact should somehow
diminish their worth or value.

We live in a society that encourages us to wear labels.  Atheist.
Agnostic.  Buddhist.  European.  American.  Black.  White.  Arab.
There's nothing wrong with those labels, really -- but there's something
wrong with letting ourselves *be defined by* our labels.  And in the
end, the ideas you hold are just another label.  Don't let your labels
define you.  Especially don't let them define your self-worth.  You are
more, and richer, than that.  We all are.  Not just everyone on this
mailing list, but every human being throughout the world.  (Even the
ones currently kidnapped on Zarbnulax.)

I'm sending this to the entire list because it's something I'd like to
tell the entire list.  None of us are our ideas.  It is normal and
natural for ideas to come into violent collision.  If your idea
prevails, congratulations, but that doesn't make you a better human
being.  If your idea doesn't, I wouldn't lose any sleep over it: no one
worth knowing would think that having an incorrect idea was any kind of
reflection on you as a person.

You certainly don't have to agree with any of this.  They're just ideas,
after all...


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users