Re: [Sks-devel] key too large?
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, David Shaw wrote: gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.4-cvs, looks like a snapshot built around April 5th, probably r4114. I don't see the problem on a different host with what is quite likely r4189. There are no meaningful changes in gpgkeys_hkp between those two revisions. Can you reproduce this with --keyserver-options use-temp-files keep-temp-files and send me the temp file? http://asteria.noreply.org/~weasel/gpg-20061714/tempin.txt http://asteria.noreply.org/~weasel/gpg-20061714/tempout.txt | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/public_html/gpg-20061714$ cat tempin.txt | VERSION 1 | PROGRAM 1.4.4-cvs | SCHEME hkp | HOST keyserver.noreply.org | PORT 80 | PATH / | COMMAND SEND | | | INFO DE7AAF6E94C09C7F BEGIN | pub:DE7AAF6E94C09C7F:17:1024:942264711:0: | uid:Peter Palfrader:951840856:0: | sig:DBD245FCB3B2A12C:10:976528694:0 | sig:21AB0663B1AE9060:10:1042281434:0 [...] | sub:7284C301B86DCE5F:16:2048:942264776:0:r | sub:5AF2C377E8F4A328:16:2048:1057717115:1154458341: | INFO DE7AAF6E94C09C7F END | KEY 94c09c7f BEGIN | -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- | Version: GnuPG v1.4.4-cvs (GNU/Linux) | | mQGiBDgp0YcRBACN9s8EycXRsu9ym3Sjou1NlPc+xz4ExlWtDOBoSlTzEJs0P/px | xyPaZ+ampr//fT+6EZXsgl4EmbQzW+boPsJ9tXkD9owm36djlsgfMcSUBf7PS7Eu [...] | xCdqABIHZUdQRwABAQkQ3nqvbpTAnH9CPQCg2MeKjGOkR1974Y2FKcn2mk9bguMA | oNI5EZKAzGXwZ+Hzpty0cfNDLk+I | =Tbd+ | -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- | KEY 94c09c7f END | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/public_html/gpg-20061714$ cat tempout.txt | VERSION 1 | PROGRAM 1.4.4-cvs | | KEY 94c09c7f FAILED 8 HTH -- | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [Sks-devel] key too large?
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 04:14:43PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, David Shaw wrote: gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.4-cvs, looks like a snapshot built around April 5th, probably r4114. I don't see the problem on a different host with what is quite likely r4189. There are no meaningful changes in gpgkeys_hkp between those two revisions. Can you reproduce this with --keyserver-options use-temp-files keep-temp-files and send me the temp file? http://asteria.noreply.org/~weasel/gpg-20061714/tempin.txt http://asteria.noreply.org/~weasel/gpg-20061714/tempout.txt Aha, fixed, thanks. Your armored key just happened to have text in it that looked like the KEY ... delimiter. David ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [Sks-devel] key too large?
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, David Shaw wrote: On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 04:14:43PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, David Shaw wrote: gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.4-cvs, looks like a snapshot built around April 5th, probably r4114. I don't see the problem on a different host with what is quite likely r4189. There are no meaningful changes in gpgkeys_hkp between those two revisions. Can you reproduce this with --keyserver-options use-temp-files keep-temp-files and send me the temp file? http://asteria.noreply.org/~weasel/gpg-20061714/tempin.txt http://asteria.noreply.org/~weasel/gpg-20061714/tempout.txt Aha, fixed, thanks. Your armored key just happened to have text in it that looked like the KEY ... delimiter. Thanks -- | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [Sks-devel] key too large?
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Peter Palfrader wrote: I wonder if my key is too large for SKS to like: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpg --send 94c09c7f gpg: sending key 94C09C7F to hkp server keyserver.noreply.org gpgkeys: HTTP post error 22: url returned error 500 gpgkeys: no KEY 94c09c7f END found gpg: keyserver internal error gpg: keyserver send failed: keyserver error If so, maybe we could patch SKS to allow larger keys? *sigh* Actually this appears to be a GnuPG problem? ./keyserver/gpgkeys_hkp.c: fprintf(console,gpgkeys: no KEY %s END found\n,keyid); -- | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [Sks-devel] key too large?
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, David Shaw wrote: On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 12:32:39AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Peter Palfrader wrote: I wonder if my key is too large for SKS to like: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpg --send 94c09c7f gpg: sending key 94C09C7F to hkp server keyserver.noreply.org gpgkeys: HTTP post error 22: url returned error 500 gpgkeys: no KEY 94c09c7f END found gpg: keyserver internal error gpg: keyserver send failed: keyserver error If so, maybe we could patch SKS to allow larger keys? *sigh* Actually this appears to be a GnuPG problem? Version? At least for the recent code, It's very hard to see how you got that error. The code just doesn't flow that way. gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.4-cvs, looks like a snapshot built around April 5th, probably r4114. I don't see the problem on a different host with what is quite likely r4189. -- | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: [Sks-devel] key too large?
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 01:12:10AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, David Shaw wrote: On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 12:32:39AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Peter Palfrader wrote: I wonder if my key is too large for SKS to like: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpg --send 94c09c7f gpg: sending key 94C09C7F to hkp server keyserver.noreply.org gpgkeys: HTTP post error 22: url returned error 500 gpgkeys: no KEY 94c09c7f END found gpg: keyserver internal error gpg: keyserver send failed: keyserver error If so, maybe we could patch SKS to allow larger keys? *sigh* Actually this appears to be a GnuPG problem? Version? At least for the recent code, It's very hard to see how you got that error. The code just doesn't flow that way. gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.4-cvs, looks like a snapshot built around April 5th, probably r4114. I don't see the problem on a different host with what is quite likely r4189. There are no meaningful changes in gpgkeys_hkp between those two revisions. Can you reproduce this with --keyserver-options use-temp-files keep-temp-files and send me the temp file? David ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
