Re: AUTO: Richard Hamilton is out of the office (returning 06/24/2010)
RFC2919, anyone? This list uses the List-* headers. -- Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mw...@iupui.edu Balance your desire for bells and whistles with the reality that only a little more than 2 percent of world population has broadband. -- Ledford and Tyler, _Google Analytics 2.0_ pgpSFczHZMoPd.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: AUTO: Richard Hamilton is out of the office (returning 06/24/2010)
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:04:41 -0600 Richard Hamilton hamil...@us.ibm.com articulated: I am out of the office until 06/24/2010. I am out of the office until Thursday June 24th. If this is a production problem, please call the solution center at 918-573-2336 or email Bob Olson at robert.ol...@williams.com. I will have limited mail and cell phone access. Note: This is an automated response to your message Re: Can we use GNUPG with PGP for commercial use sent on 6/17/10 10:21:32. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. I was just stating to a colleague that it had been months since an errant vacation message had been posted on this forum. Well, thanks to Bob, that drought has been quenched. With the summer season now upon us and vacations becoming the norm, I rest assured that more such individuals will be advising us of their schedule. Then again, maybe, just maybe, this might be a good time for all of us to check that we have our mail programs, be them what they may, properly configured so as to not pollute forums with useless OOF/vacation garbage announcements. -- Jerry ✌ gnupg.u...@seibercom.net _ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. I'll be comfortable on the couch. Famous last words. Lenny Bruce ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: AUTO: Richard Hamilton is out of the office (returning 06/24/2010)
Jerry wrote: On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:04:41 -0600 I was just stating to a colleague that it had been months since an errant vacation message had been posted on this forum. Well, thanks to Bob, that drought has been quenched. With the summer season now upon us and vacations becoming the norm, I rest assured that more such individuals will be advising us of their schedule. Then again, maybe, just maybe, this might be a good time for all of us to check that we have our mail programs, be them what they may, properly configured so as to not pollute forums with useless OOF/vacation garbage announcements. If I understand correctly, this is done by setting the precedence of the vacation e-mail to bulk instead of something else (list?), and that mailing list programs do not send the stuff marked bulk. Is that not how mailing list programs work? -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jerseyhttp://counter.li.org ^^-^^ 08:20:01 up 42 days, 16:15, 3 users, load average: 4.65, 4.81, 4.56 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: AUTO: Richard Hamilton is out of the office (returning 06/24/2010)
David Smith wrote: Jean-David Beyer wrote: If I understand correctly, this is done by setting the precedence of the vacation e-mail to bulk instead of something else (list?), and that mailing list programs do not send the stuff marked bulk. Is that not how mailing list programs work? Not quite. Mailing lists programs normally send mails with the Precedence: bulk or Precedence: junk header, and then the autoresponder should recognise this and choose not to respond to mails with the bulk or junk precedence header. It is up to the autoresponder to act correctly. Well, the stuff I get from the Gnupg-users@gnupg.org list has precedence: list set. Other lists to which I subscribe use Precedence normal or precedence: bulk. Regular e-mail does not have precedence set at all. It seems to me that mailing lists should get their acts together. -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jerseyhttp://counter.li.org ^^-^^ 09:10:01 up 42 days, 17:05, 3 users, load average: 4.63, 4.80, 4.74 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: AUTO: Richard Hamilton is out of the office (returning 06/24/2010)
Jean-David Beyer wrote: David Smith wrote: Mailing lists programs normally send mails with the Precedence: bulk or Precedence: junk header, and then the autoresponder should recognise this and choose not to respond to mails with the bulk or junk precedence header. It is up to the autoresponder to act correctly. Well, the stuff I get from the Gnupg-users@gnupg.org list has precedence: list set. Other lists to which I subscribe use Precedence normal or precedence: bulk. Regular e-mail does not have precedence set at all. It seems to me that mailing lists should get their acts together. OK, Maybe Precedence: list is also a valid implementation; I haven't looked in detail at the RFQs, etc. - I was just typing from memory. The basic method of operation is the same, though - the MLM marks the message as a mailing list message using the Precedence header, and the autoresponder interprets this header when deciding whether to respond. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: AUTO: Richard Hamilton is out of the office (returning 06/24/2010)
Jean-David Beyer wrote: Well, the stuff I get from the Gnupg-users@gnupg.org list has precedence: list set. Other lists to which I subscribe use Precedence normal or precedence: bulk. Regular e-mail does not have precedence set at all. It seems to me that mailing lists should get their acts together. Just checked the relevant RFC (3834), and it says (rather unhelpfully): (Because Precedence is not a standard header field, and its use and interpretation vary widely in the wild, no particular responder behavior in the presence of Precedence is recommended by this specification.) ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: AUTO: Richard Hamilton is out of the office (returning 06/24/2010)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 18/06/2010 14:24, David Smith wrote: Jean-David Beyer wrote: David Smith wrote: Mailing lists programs normally send mails with the Precedence: bulk or Precedence: junk header, and then the autoresponder should recognise this and choose not to respond to mails with the bulk or junk precedence header. It is up to the autoresponder to act correctly. Well, the stuff I get from the Gnupg-users@gnupg.org list has precedence: list set. Other lists to which I subscribe use Precedence normal or precedence: bulk. Regular e-mail does not have precedence set at all. It seems to me that mailing lists should get their acts together. OK, Maybe Precedence: list is also a valid implementation; I haven't looked in detail at the RFQs, etc. - I was just typing from memory. The basic method of operation is the same, though - the MLM marks the message as a mailing list message using the Precedence header, and the autoresponder interprets this header when deciding whether to respond. Many years ago I used to maintain the Linux vacation and one of the checks it did was to check for the existence of the Precedence header. We also started to add support for Mailman listheaders. Any decently written OOF/vacation should be able to ignore most mailing lists Sean - -- GSWoT and CaCert WOT Assurer http://www.google.com/profiles/thecivvie .tel http://rima.tel/ I believe that every human has a finite number of heartbeats. I don't intend to waste any of mine running around doing exercises. - Neil Armstrong -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org Comment: Contact Details http://rima.tel Comment: My GPG Key http://thecivvie.fastmail.fm/sean.pubkey.txt iHIEAREIADIFAkwbdZErFIAAFQANcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3Jnc2Vh bkBzcmltYS5ldQAKCRDJ1+LfaIt9mCNgAJ4m68Bnco+1kptidhnaoG43GriaVgCf VueIW/P8HxhPvPs3gbcqxc/QKfI= =dQ1J -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
AUTO: Richard Hamilton is out of the office (returning 06/24/2010)
I am out of the office until 06/24/2010. I am out of the office until Thursday June 24th. If this is a production problem, please call the solution center at 918-573-2336 or email Bob Olson at robert.ol...@williams.com. I will have limited mail and cell phone access. Note: This is an automated response to your message Re: Can we use GNUPG with PGP for commercial use sent on 6/17/10 10:21:32. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
