Re: compilation information ?
Robert J. Hansen wrote: On 3/14/2012 12:44 AM, brian m. carlson wrote: From looking at the source, I don't believe so. Note that the only case in which you have more than one option is Windows/DOS. GnuPG compiles just fine under the Intel C/C++ compilers, under the GNU Compiler Collection, under Sun Studio, under AIX's own compiler and under Clang. Probably more, too, but these are the only ones I've checked. (What's the standard compiler for OpenVMS?) VMS? DEC C aka Compaq C aka HP C $ cc/version HP C V7.3-009 on OpenVMS Alpha V8.3 $ Steven Schweda did a LOT of work porting 1.4.x to VMS. There are a *ton* of options for how to compile GnuPG on non-Windows platforms. Windows is one of the more limited platforms, since you're more or less limited to MinGW-GCC or Cygwin-GCC. The last time I used MS Visual C++ to try to compile GnuPG, the results were pretty awful... The main difference is Cygwin will give you a more POSIXy feel along with the default location for $GNUPGHOME. The OS version string is set by configure as a #DEFINE in config.h. I worote a patch a while back that calls GetVersionEx and then determines the version of Windows that gpg is running on and prints that. Never did anything with it because I didn't think there'd be much interest in adding it to the code base. Back in the Dark Ages of 1.2.x, there were project files for MSVC as an individual project. There /may/ be some work done somewhere on the 1.4 branch, but I think it'd probably be more work than value added. -- John P. Clizbe Inet: John ( a ) Enigmail DAWT net FSF Assoc #995 / FSFE Fellow #1797 hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or mailto:pgp-public-k...@gingerbear.net?subject=HELP Cowboy Haiku -- Reflections on Rodeo So many Cowboys. / Round Wrangler butts drive me nuts. / Never enough rope. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: compilation information ?
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 05:44, sand...@crustytoothpaste.net said: platforms, the binary is always compiled in the ordinary way. I expect exposing this information was not considered to be terribly important since most platforms don't have this issue. Actually we can't do that. A specific build of GnuPG may differ in many aspects and thus it would be hard to define a short info string for it. The information you needs is at the very least the content of config.h and config.status, as they give information about the speicific environment. However, you may not be able to see the version of the compiler or the linked to/in libraries. Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: compilation information ?
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:24:06PM -0400, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote: Is there any command that tells how the gnupg version was compiled? gpg --version doesn't list it. A simple way to find out is to do gpg --armor filename [or any other command resulting in gpg .asc file], and the information will be listed in the version line, i.e. Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Cygwin) Is there any way to find out without performing a gpg function on a file? From looking at the source, I don't believe so. Note that the only case in which you have more than one option is Windows/DOS. For other platforms, the binary is always compiled in the ordinary way. I expect exposing this information was not considered to be terribly important since most platforms don't have this issue. -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: compilation information ?
On 3/14/2012 12:44 AM, brian m. carlson wrote: From looking at the source, I don't believe so. Note that the only case in which you have more than one option is Windows/DOS. GnuPG compiles just fine under the Intel C/C++ compilers, under the GNU Compiler Collection, under Sun Studio, under AIX's own compiler and under Clang. Probably more, too, but these are the only ones I've checked. (What's the standard compiler for OpenVMS?) There are a *ton* of options for how to compile GnuPG on non-Windows platforms. Windows is one of the more limited platforms, since you're more or less limited to MinGW-GCC or Cygwin-GCC. The last time I used MS Visual C++ to try to compile GnuPG, the results were pretty awful... ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
compilation information ?
Is there any command that tells how the gnupg version was compiled? gpg --version doesn't list it. A simple way to find out is to do gpg --armor filename [or any other command resulting in gpg .asc file], and the information will be listed in the version line, i.e. Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Cygwin) Is there any way to find out without performing a gpg function on a file? TIA, vedaal ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
