Re: status of ed25519 draft

2016-02-25 Thread Werner Koch
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:31, br...@minton.name said:
> The next draft is due soon.  How long does it usually take the IETF to
> ratify a draft RFC?

There won't be an RFC for that I-D.  Instead it will hopefully be part
of rfc-4880bis (the updated OpenPGP specs which is in the works).

Given that there are no real complaints about the Ed25519 I-D I plan to
remove the extra prompt during key generation and go ahead with Ed25519.
RFC-4880bis will take too long to get published.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: status of ed25519 draft

2016-02-24 Thread Brian Minton
The next draft is due soon.  How long does it usually take the IETF to
ratify a draft RFC?

On 02/11/2015 05:20 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:56, br...@minton.name said:
>> Is there any way to see the progress of the IETF working group on
>> the draft Werner has submitted?  I noticed that the draft expires in
> The process to get the I-D to an RFC is somewhat work intensive and I
> would actually prefer to have the OpenPGP WG re-established to make it
> easier.  I will of course update the I-D in time.
>
>> May.  In particular, I would like to know if 22 is going to be the IANA
>> standardized Public-Key Algorithm number. 
> We have an informal agreement on the WG list to use that number.
>
>
> Shalom-Salam,
>
>Werner
>
>




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: status of ed25519 draft

2015-02-11 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:56, br...@minton.name said:
> Is there any way to see the progress of the IETF working group on
> the draft Werner has submitted?  I noticed that the draft expires in

The process to get the I-D to an RFC is somewhat work intensive and I
would actually prefer to have the OpenPGP WG re-established to make it
easier.  I will of course update the I-D in time.

> May.  In particular, I would like to know if 22 is going to be the IANA
> standardized Public-Key Algorithm number. 

We have an informal agreement on the WG list to use that number.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner


-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


status of ed25519 draft

2015-02-10 Thread Brian Minton
Is there any way to see the progress of the IETF working group on
the draft Werner has submitted?  I noticed that the draft expires in
May.  In particular, I would like to know if 22 is going to be the IANA
standardized Public-Key Algorithm number. 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users