Re: Renaming GWorkspace to Workspace

2006-09-22 Thread Gregory John Casamento
Enrico/Guerkan,
 
 I would suggest another name, such as "Workplace", or something similar.   
Renaming it "Workspace" would be like me renaming Gorm as "Interface Builder".  
Something tells me that might be an issue. :)
 
 Anyway... that's my $0.02.
 
 Later, GJC
 
--Gregory Casamento

- Original Message 
From: Enrico Sersale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: GNUstep dev 
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 8:01:57 AM
Subject: Re: Renaming GWorkspace to Workspace

On 2006-09-22 14:28:50 +0300 Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello
> 
> Is there anyone against renaming the GWorkspace application to just Workspace 
> ?
> 
> I would welcome this rename.
> 
> Yours,
> Guerkan

For me it's ok. But I can only change the name of the app to "Workspace" and 
change "GWorkspace" with "Workspace" in NSWorkspace.m. (I can't rename tons of 
classes and ivars that actually have the "GW" prefix...).



___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev






___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev


Re: Latest checkout of SVN breaks due to bugs in NSScrollView

2006-09-22 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald


On 22 Sep 2006, at 14:27, Chris Vetter wrote:


--- NSScrollView.m.ORG  Fri Sep 22 15:24:28 2006
+++ NSScrollView.m  Fri Sep 22 15:25:01 2006
@@ -951,11 +951,11 @@
break;

   case NSBezelBorder:
-   [[GSTheme theme] drawGrayBezel: _bounds : rect];
+   [[GSTheme theme] drawGrayBezel: _bounds withClip: rect];
break;

   case NSGrooveBorder:
-   [[GSTheme theme] drawGroove: _bounds : rect];
+   [[GSTheme theme] drawGroove: _bounds withClip: rect];
break;
 }



Thanks ... small change missed from commit ... added in at revision  
23590




___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev


Latest checkout of SVN breaks due to bugs in NSScrollView

2006-09-22 Thread Chris Vetter

--- NSScrollView.m.ORG  Fri Sep 22 15:24:28 2006
+++ NSScrollView.m  Fri Sep 22 15:25:01 2006
@@ -951,11 +951,11 @@
break;

   case NSBezelBorder:
-   [[GSTheme theme] drawGrayBezel: _bounds : rect];
+   [[GSTheme theme] drawGrayBezel: _bounds withClip: rect];
break;

   case NSGrooveBorder:
-   [[GSTheme theme] drawGroove: _bounds : rect];
+   [[GSTheme theme] drawGroove: _bounds withClip: rect];
break;
 }

--
Chris



___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev


Re: Renaming GWorkspace to Workspace

2006-09-22 Thread Gürkan Sengün

For me it's ok. But I can only change the name of the app to "Workspace" and change "GWorkspace" 
with "Workspace" in NSWorkspace.m. (I can't rename tons of classes and ivars that actually have the 
"GW" prefix...).


That's perfectly fine to me.

Guerkan



___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev


Re: Renaming GWorkspace to Workspace

2006-09-22 Thread Enrico Sersale
On 2006-09-22 14:28:50 +0300 Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello
> 
> Is there anyone against renaming the GWorkspace application to just Workspace 
> ?
> 
> I would welcome this rename.
> 
> Yours,
> Guerkan

For me it's ok. But I can only change the name of the app to "Workspace" and 
change "GWorkspace" with "Workspace" in NSWorkspace.m. (I can't rename tons of 
classes and ivars that actually have the "GW" prefix...).



___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev


Renaming GWorkspace to Workspace

2006-09-22 Thread Gürkan Sengün

Hello

Is there anyone against renaming the GWorkspace application to just Workspace ?

I would welcome this rename.

Yours,
Guerkan



___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev


GNUstep Testfarm Results

2006-09-22 Thread Adam Fedor
Test results for GNUstep as of Fri Sep 22 06:34:13 EDT 2006
If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will
be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm

If you would like to add your machine to this list, set up a cron job
(make sure you set up your PATH and other environment variables correctly)
to run the Startup/scripts/test-gnustep script (see the script comments 
for more info).

Success Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.0 Fri Sep 22 03:56:05 CEST 2006
Fail Compile i686-pc-linux-gnu Thu Sep 21 22:23:51 CEST 2006
Success Compile powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0 Fri Sep 22 03:06:11 MDT 2006
Success Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Fri Sep 22 02:04:34 EDT 2006
Success Compile x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Fri Sep 22 04:06:55 BST 2006


___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev


configuration 'variables'

2006-09-22 Thread Chris Vetter

Hi,

I was wondering whether it wouldn't make sense to make all the 
HAVE_xyz variables available that are defined during installation of 
GNUstep. That would make it easier to program without having to check 
first (again) whether GNUstep is compiled with, for example, pthread 
or libxml support.


Since -make, -base and -gui already check for a whole slew of 
'features' why not store those in /Library/.../base.make and 
.../gui.make (or somewhere else) as well?


That would make the need of writing another configure script that 
checks for the same features again, or tons of ifeq(...) in 
GNUmakefile(s) obsolete.


Just a thought,

--
Chris



___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev