GNUstep Testfarm Results
Test results for GNUstep as of Sun Dec 7 06:34:10 EST 2008 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_testfarm.3F Fail Compile i386-unknown-freebsd6.4 Sun Dec 7 15:38:36 CST 2008 Success Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Sun Dec 7 01:41:22 EST 2008 Success Compile x86_64-unknown-netbsd4.0 Sun Dec 7 03:55:44 CET 2008 ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Adam Fedor wrote: Test results for GNUstep as of Sun Dec 7 06:34:10 EST 2008 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_testfarm.3F Fail Compile i386-unknown-freebsd6.4 Sun Dec 7 15:38:36 CST 2008 To me the check problem reported here look like the are caused by the recent SYSTEM install change. We could either update the build script to install into SYSTEM again or change the tests. Success Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Sun Dec 7 01:41:22 EST 2008 Success Compile x86_64-unknown-netbsd4.0 Sun Dec 7 03:55:44 CET 2008 Why isn't the same happening here? ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Shouldn't the compile farm remove previous installations so that chicken-and-egg dependencies can be detected? Gregory Casamento -- Principal Consultant - OLC, Inc # GNUstep Chief Maintainer From: Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Developer GNUstep gnustep-dev@gnu.org Sent: Sunday, December 7, 2008 12:56:02 PM Subject: Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results On Dec 7, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote: Fail Compile i386-unknown-freebsd6.4 Sun Dec 7 15:38:36 CST 2008 To me the check problem reported here look like the are caused by the recent SYSTEM install change. We could either update the build script to install into SYSTEM again or change the tests. Success Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Sun Dec 7 01:41:22 EST 2008 Success Compile x86_64-unknown-netbsd4.0 Sun Dec 7 03:55:44 CET 2008 Why isn't the same happening here? Probably due to a previous install. I should probably improve that test. ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep on DirectFB
Hi Christopher, On 2008-12-07 00:52:06 +0100 Lisbon Acid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not sure if this has been implemented before or not, I know it has been talked about, but over the past three days I've thrown together a hacked up backend for GNUstep running through DirectFB. It is definitely not perfect or usable at this point, but with just a little bit more effort this will be solid. Just wanted to announce that on here in case anyone was interested. I consider this very interesting, it might prove important on devices where running X is an additional burden, likke embedded devices. I imagine Nikolaus might prove interestd for OpenMoko or the Zaurus, where the X11 is run as an additional appliation and not native. Here are a few screenshots. Obviously there are rendering issues. The one seen here is the color issue. There's another where it seems the image data is being rendered a pixel or two skinnier than the window, thus cacading the interface to the left one pixel on every line... soon to be fixed. The shift you are seeing is very similar to the problem the cairo backend has when exporting X11 display from a big-endian machine to a little-endian one. Riccardo ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
I fixed that also. On Dec 7, 2008, at 11:01 AM, Gregory John Casamento wrote: Shouldn't the compile farm remove previous installations so that chicken-and-egg dependencies can be detected? ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
