Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
That's weird. I tested the asm in a separate file on i386/FreeBSD, and it worked correctly, but now the change has been merged it appears not to for me either. Revert it for now, and I'll take a look at it when I get back. Alternatively, put the new version in #ifdef __clang__ and leave the old version in place for GCC, although that's a bit ugly. David On 2 Apr 2009, at 13:40, Nicola Pero wrote: Fail Compile i386-unknown-freebsd7.1 Thu Apr 2 15:35:09 CST 2009 Btw, I had a quick look - this was due to Compiling file NSObject.m ... /var/tmp//cc968ivA.s: Assembler messages: /var/tmp//cc968ivA.s:1437: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `fstcw' /var/tmp//cc968ivA.s:1446: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `fldcw' gmake[3]: *** [obj/NSObject.m.o] Error 1 It might be worth for David to review the latest changes to NSObject.m Thanks ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Fail Compile i386-unknown-freebsd7.1 Thu Apr 2 15:35:09 CST 2009 Btw, I had a quick look - this was due to Compiling file NSObject.m ... /var/tmp//cc968ivA.s: Assembler messages: /var/tmp//cc968ivA.s:1437: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `fstcw' /var/tmp//cc968ivA.s:1446: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `fldcw' gmake[3]: *** [obj/NSObject.m.o] Error 1 It might be worth for David to review the latest changes to NSObject.m Thanks ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
I fixed that also. On Dec 7, 2008, at 11:01 AM, Gregory John Casamento wrote: Shouldn't the compile farm remove previous installations so that chicken-and-egg dependencies can be detected? ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Shouldn't the compile farm remove previous installations so that chicken-and-egg dependencies can be detected? Gregory Casamento -- Principal Consultant - OLC, Inc # GNUstep Chief Maintainer From: Adam Fedor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Developer GNUstep Sent: Sunday, December 7, 2008 12:56:02 PM Subject: Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results On Dec 7, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote: >> >> Fail Compile i386-unknown-freebsd6.4 Sun Dec 7 15:38:36 CST 2008 > > To me the check problem reported here look like the are caused by the > recent SYSTEM install change. We could either update the build script to > install into SYSTEM again or change the tests. > >> Success Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Sun Dec 7 01:41:22 EST 2008 >> Success Compile x86_64-unknown-netbsd4.0 Sun Dec 7 03:55:44 CET 2008 > > Why isn't the same happening here? > Probably due to a previous install. I should probably improve that test. ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
On Dec 7, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote: Fail Compile i386-unknown-freebsd6.4 Sun Dec 7 15:38:36 CST 2008 To me the check problem reported here look like the are caused by the recent SYSTEM install change. We could either update the build script to install into SYSTEM again or change the tests. Success Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Sun Dec 7 01:41:22 EST 2008 Success Compile x86_64-unknown-netbsd4.0 Sun Dec 7 03:55:44 CET 2008 Why isn't the same happening here? Probably due to a previous install. I should probably improve that test. ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Adam Fedor wrote: > Test results for GNUstep as of Sun Dec 7 06:34:10 EST 2008 > If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will > be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm > > If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see > http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_testfarm.3F > > Fail Compile i386-unknown-freebsd6.4 Sun Dec 7 15:38:36 CST 2008 To me the check problem reported here look like the are caused by the recent SYSTEM install change. We could either update the build script to install into SYSTEM again or change the tests. > Success Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Sun Dec 7 01:41:22 EST 2008 > Success Compile x86_64-unknown-netbsd4.0 Sun Dec 7 03:55:44 CET 2008 Why isn't the same happening here? ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Adam Fedor wrote: On Sep 6, 2008, at 5:42 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote: what is happening here? For the last few days we have been getting failure notices, but there are no updated error logs on the server. I can see the error logs on the ftp site, can't you? On both systems, there is: Compiling file NSBitmapImageRep+GIF.m ... NSBitmapImageRep+GIF.m: In function '-[NSBitmapImageRep(GIFReading) _GIFRepresentationWithProperties:errorMessage:]': NSBitmapImageRep+GIF.m:502: warning: implicit declaration of function 'EGifOpen' NSBitmapImageRep+GIF.m:502: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast Compiling file NSBitmapImageRep+ICNS.m ... NSBitmapImageRep+ICNS.m: In function '-[NSBitmapImageRep(ICNS) _initBitmapFromICNS:]': NSBitmapImageRep+ICNS.m:518: error: 'ICNS_128X128_32BIT_DATA' undeclared (first use in this function) NSBitmapImageRep+ICNS.m:518: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once NSBitmapImageRep+ICNS.m:518: error: for each function it appears in.) make[2]: *** [obj/NSBitmapImageRep+ICNS.m.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [libgnustep-gui.all.library.variables] Error 2 My Firefox only showed a cached version of the FTP site. I had to do a refresh and didn't think of that before. The error we get is caused by Gregs change to the icns format handling. He had to change an inconsistently named constant to the name used in libicns, but forgot to change the definition in this file. It didn't affect him as he has libicns installed :-( I tried to upload a correction, but currently our SVN site is unreachable for me. I will try later again. Fred ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
On Sep 6, 2008, at 5:42 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote: what is happening here? For the last few days we have been getting failure notices, but there are no updated error logs on the server. I can see the error logs on the ftp site, can't you? On both systems, there is: Compiling file NSBitmapImageRep+GIF.m ... NSBitmapImageRep+GIF.m: In function '-[NSBitmapImageRep(GIFReading) _GIFRepresentationWithProperties:errorMessage:]': NSBitmapImageRep+GIF.m:502: warning: implicit declaration of function 'EGifOpen' NSBitmapImageRep+GIF.m:502: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast Compiling file NSBitmapImageRep+ICNS.m ... NSBitmapImageRep+ICNS.m: In function '-[NSBitmapImageRep(ICNS) _initBitmapFromICNS:]': NSBitmapImageRep+ICNS.m:518: error: 'ICNS_128X128_32BIT_DATA' undeclared (first use in this function) NSBitmapImageRep+ICNS.m:518: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once NSBitmapImageRep+ICNS.m:518: error: for each function it appears in.) make[2]: *** [obj/NSBitmapImageRep+ICNS.m.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [libgnustep-gui.all.library.variables] Error 2 ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Adam Fedor wrote: Test results for GNUstep as of Sat Sep 6 06:34:10 EDT 2008 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_testfarm.3F Fail Compile i386-unknown-freebsd6.3 Sat Sep 6 15:44:09 CST 2008 Fail Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Sat Sep 6 01:29:47 EDT 2008 Hi Adam, what is happening here? For the last few days we have been getting failure notices, but there are no updated error logs on the server. Fred ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
On Jul 4, 2008, at 9:58 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote: Adam Fedor wrote: Test results for GNUstep as of Fri Jul 4 06:34:11 EDT 2008 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_testfarm.3F Success Compile i386-unknown-freebsd6.3 Fri Jul 4 15:49:14 CST 2008 Success Compile i386-unknown-freebsd7.0 Fri Jul 4 16:03:51 CST 2008 Success Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Fri Jul 4 01:38:14 EDT 2008 Fail Compile x86_64-unknown-netbsd4.0 Fri Jul 4 03:54:07 CEST 2008 Looks like the build on x86_64 is failing because no FFI library can be found. has anything changed on the machine or is the caused by any of Richards recent changes? Actually this is a new machine we just set up, so it's missing a few libraries like tiff and x-dev ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Adam Fedor wrote: Test results for GNUstep as of Fri Jul 4 06:34:11 EDT 2008 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_testfarm.3F Success Compile i386-unknown-freebsd6.3 Fri Jul 4 15:49:14 CST 2008 Success Compile i386-unknown-freebsd7.0 Fri Jul 4 16:03:51 CST 2008 Success Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Fri Jul 4 01:38:14 EDT 2008 Fail Compile x86_64-unknown-netbsd4.0 Fri Jul 4 03:54:07 CEST 2008 Looks like the build on x86_64 is failing because no FFI library can be found. has anything changed on the machine or is the caused by any of Richards recent changes? ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
David Ayers schrieb: > Adam Fedor schrieb: > >>Test results for GNUstep as of Thu Dec 20 06:34:12 EST 2007 >>If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will >>be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm > > >>Fail Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Thu Dec 20 01:21:07 EST 2007 > > > NSBroweser's encodeWithCoder: flags declaration is on line 2602 in my > editor. Could someone insure that the source is current? Sorry, my bad... old tarball. Cheers, David ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Adam Fedor schrieb: > Test results for GNUstep as of Thu Dec 20 06:34:12 EST 2007 > If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will > be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm > Fail Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Thu Dec 20 01:21:07 EST 2007 Compiling file NSBrowser.m ... NSBrowser.m: In function `-[NSBrowser encodeWithCoder:]': NSBrowser.m:2515: parse error before `long' NSBrowser.m:2516: `flags' undeclared (first use in this function) NSBrowser.m:2516: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once NSBrowser.m:2516: for each function it appears in.) make[2]: *** [shared_obj/NSBrowser.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [libgnustep-gui.all.library.variables] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/raid0/ps0/fedor/src/gstep/testing/core/gui/Source' make: *** [internal-all] Error 2 NSBroweser's encodeWithCoder: flags declaration is on line 2602 in my editor. Could someone insure that the source is current? Cheers, David ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Adam Fedor wrote: > Tiger (10.4). David Wetzel has Leopard, which he might start the > testsuite on. Done. (on PPC) I can do Intel tomorrow. Dave ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Hi > >> Fail Compile powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0-apple > BTW: Is this Leopard or Tiger? (I'm asking as I'm wondering whether we > are dealing with the ObjC 2.0 runtime or not.) Leopard is: Darwin sina.lan 9.1.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.1.0: Wed Oct 31 17:48:21 PDT 2007; root:xnu- 1228.0.2~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh Dave ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
On Dec 11, 2007, at 1:25 PM, David Ayers wrote: BTW: Is this Leopard or Tiger? (I'm asking as I'm wondering whether we are dealing with the ObjC 2.0 runtime or not.) Tiger (10.4). David Wetzel has Leopard, which he might start the testsuite on. ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Adam Fedor schrieb: > > On Dec 11, 2007, at 4:34 AM, Adam Fedor wrote: > >> Test results for GNUstep as of Tue Dec 11 06:34:09 EST 2007 >> If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will >> be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm >> >> If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see >> http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/ >> Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_t >> estfarm.3F >> > ... > >> Fail Compile powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0-apple Mon Dec 10 22:15:00 MST >> 2007 >> > > FYI, just getting the bugs worked out with this. This is the apple- > apple-apple (base additions) compile. Thanks Adam! I'm keeping an eye on it. BTW: Is this Leopard or Tiger? (I'm asking as I'm wondering whether we are dealing with the ObjC 2.0 runtime or not.) Cheers, David ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
On Dec 11, 2007, at 4:34 AM, Adam Fedor wrote: Test results for GNUstep as of Tue Dec 11 06:34:09 EST 2007 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/ Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_t estfarm.3F ... Fail Compile powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0-apple Mon Dec 10 22:15:00 MST 2007 FYI, just getting the bugs worked out with this. This is the apple- apple-apple (base additions) compile. ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Hi GNUstep developers, David Ayers wrote: > Adam Fedor schrieb: >> Test results for GNUstep as of Mon Dec 3 06:34:10 EST 2007 >> If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will >> be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm >> >> If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see >> http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_testfarm.3F >> >> Fail Compile i386-unknown-freebsd6.3 Mon Dec 3 15:36:40 CST 2007 > > NSDecimalNumber.m: In function `-[NSDecimalNumber initWithBytes:objCType:]': > NSDecimalNumber.m:348: warning: implicit declaration of function `isinff' > ... > ../Source/./obj/libgnustep-base.so: undefined reference to `isinff' > gmake[2]: *** [obj/autogsdoc] Error 1 > gmake[1]: *** [autogsdoc.all.tool.variables] Error 2 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory > `/var/home/gstest/gnustep-testfarm/core/base/Tools' > gmake: *** [internal-all] Error 2 > > > Could someone with access to a FreeBSD system check whether I need to > define something special (akin to _GNU_SOURCE) to make isinff() visible, > or let me know of FreeBSD's C-Library simply does not provide isinff? On my FreeBSD 6.3-RC1 box, isinf() is a macro that supports both double and float (so does isnan()), and visible from , but there is no isinff(). I think it conforms to the ISO C standard according to this: http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/isinf.html I am not sure about isinff(). Regards, Yong-jhen. > > >> Success Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.1 Mon Dec 3 03:57:12 CET 2007 >> Fail Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Mon Dec 3 01:23:28 EST 2007 > > Here it seems that > > isnanf > isinf > isinff > > are all not visible. There must also be someway to expose the C99 macros. > > Cheers, > David ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Yong-Jhen Hong schrieb: > Hi GNUstep developers, > > David Ayers wrote: >> Adam Fedor schrieb: >>> Test results for GNUstep as of Mon Dec 3 06:34:10 EST 2007 >>> If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will >>> be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm >>> >>> If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see >>> > http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_testfarm.3F > >>> >>> Fail Compile i386-unknown-freebsd6.3 Mon Dec 3 15:36:40 CST 2007 >> >> NSDecimalNumber.m: In function `-[NSDecimalNumber > initWithBytes:objCType:]': >> NSDecimalNumber.m:348: warning: implicit declaration of function `isinff' >> ... >> ../Source/./obj/libgnustep-base.so: undefined reference to `isinff' >> gmake[2]: *** [obj/autogsdoc] Error 1 >> gmake[1]: *** [autogsdoc.all.tool.variables] Error 2 >> gmake[1]: Leaving directory >> `/var/home/gstest/gnustep-testfarm/core/base/Tools' >> gmake: *** [internal-all] Error 2 >> >> >> Could someone with access to a FreeBSD system check whether I need to >> define something special (akin to _GNU_SOURCE) to make isinff() visible, >> or let me know of FreeBSD's C-Library simply does not provide isinff? > > On my FreeBSD 6.3-RC1 box, isinf() is a macro that supports both > double and float (so does isnan()), and visible from , > but there is no isinff(). > > I think it conforms to the ISO C standard according to this: > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/isinf.html > > I am not sure about isinff(). Thanks... indeed I was mistaken that isinff() is part of C99. I could have used isinf() for floats also as it there seem to be sizeof checks within that macro to insure that no implicit promotion takes place. I've currently fellback to fpclassify since I thought that would be more portable, but it infact it's as portable as the isinf/isnan macros (ie. C99). What /might/ have helped on Solaris (or at least newer Solaris versions) is the "#define _ISO99_SOURCE". But the current code should also work for FreeBSD. Cheers, David ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
On solaris, isnanf is defined in , but not the other ones. Although there is a function fpclass() which provides similar information. I don't know about FreeBSD On Mon Dec 3 7:09 , David Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: A > Success Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.1 Mon Dec 3 03:57:12 CET 2007 > Fail Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Mon Dec 3 01:23:28 EST 2007 Here it seems that isnanf isinf isinff ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Adam Fedor schrieb: > Test results for GNUstep as of Mon Dec 3 06:34:10 EST 2007 > If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will > be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm > > If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see > http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_testfarm.3F > > Fail Compile i386-unknown-freebsd6.3 Mon Dec 3 15:36:40 CST 2007 NSDecimalNumber.m: In function `-[NSDecimalNumber initWithBytes:objCType:]': NSDecimalNumber.m:348: warning: implicit declaration of function `isinff' ... ../Source/./obj/libgnustep-base.so: undefined reference to `isinff' gmake[2]: *** [obj/autogsdoc] Error 1 gmake[1]: *** [autogsdoc.all.tool.variables] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/var/home/gstest/gnustep-testfarm/core/base/Tools' gmake: *** [internal-all] Error 2 Could someone with access to a FreeBSD system check whether I need to define something special (akin to _GNU_SOURCE) to make isinff() visible, or let me know of FreeBSD's C-Library simply does not provide isinff? > Success Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.1 Mon Dec 3 03:57:12 CET 2007 > Fail Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Mon Dec 3 01:23:28 EST 2007 Here it seems that isnanf isinf isinff are all not visible. There must also be someway to expose the C99 macros. Cheers, David ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
RE: GNUstep Testfarm Results
The instruction here is broken. http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_testfarm.3F bash-3.00# wget http://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/daily-snapshots/Startup.current.tar.bz2 --07:30:09-- http://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/daily-snapshots/Startup.current.tar.bz2 => `Startup.current.tar.bz2' Resolving ftp.gnustep.org... 81.201.178.155 Connecting to ftp.gnustep.org|81.201.178.155|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 07:30:12 ERROR 404: Not Found. bash-3.00# uname -a SunOS netinstall2 5.10 Generic_120012-14 i86pc i386 i86pc bash-3.00# See uname -a for my goal ;) T.J. Yang > To: gnustep-dev@gnu.org > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 06:34:18 -0500 > Subject: GNUstep Testfarm Results > > Test results for GNUstep as of Wed Nov 7 06:34:18 EST 2007 > If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will > be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm > > If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see > http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_testfarm.3F > > Fail Compile i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 Wed Nov 7 15:32:26 CST 2007 > Success Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.1 Wed Nov 7 03:57:10 CET 2007 > Success Compile powerpc-apple-darwin8.10.0 Wed Nov 7 00:33:47 MST 2007 > Success Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Wed Nov 7 01:34:05 EST 2007 > > > ___ > Gnustep-dev mailing list > Gnustep-dev@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev _ Climb to the top of the charts! Play Star Shuffle: the word scramble challenge with star power. http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_oct___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
On Oct 8, 2007, at 12:56 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote: I had a look at this problem and it is the same that Riccardo reported in bug #21279. I had hoped to resolve it by the patch I applied and Riccardo reported it as resolved today, but this compilation should have happened after my patch and it still failed. Any idea what is going on here? I think the machine is having troubles connecting to svn to get updates. I'll have to look into it. ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Adam Fedor wrote: > Test results for GNUstep as of Mon Oct 8 06:40:27 EDT 2007 > If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will > be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm > > If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see > http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_testfarm.3F > > Fail Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.1 Mon Oct 8 03:56:46 CEST 2007 > Success Compile powerpc-apple-darwin8.10.0 Mon Oct 8 00:35:49 MDT 2007 > Success Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Mon Oct 8 01:32:32 EDT 2007 > I had a look at this problem and it is the same that Riccardo reported in bug #21279. I had hoped to resolve it by the patch I applied and Riccardo reported it as resolved today, but this compilation should have happened after my patch and it still failed. Any idea what is going on here? Fred ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
On Sep 17, 2007, at 12:12 PM, Gonzalo Delgado wrote: Adam Fedor escribió: Test results for GNUstep as of Mon Sep 17 06:40:27 EDT 2007 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/ Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_ testfarm.3F Success Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.1 Mon Sep 17 03:57:16 CEST 2007 Fail Compile powerpc-apple-darwin8.10.0 Mon Sep 17 00:24:39 MDT 2007 Success Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Mon Sep 17 01:33:11 EDT 2007 The first wget instruction in the wiki doesn't work. The Startup.current.tar.bz2 file is not there. Is there an alternate location or file name? I'll try to get the files updated again, Although you could also check it out via svn directly. https://gna.org/svn/?group=gnustep ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Adam Fedor escribió: > Test results for GNUstep as of Mon Sep 17 06:40:27 EDT 2007 > If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will > be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm > > If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see > http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_testfarm.3F > > Success Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.1 Mon Sep 17 03:57:16 CEST 2007 > Fail Compile powerpc-apple-darwin8.10.0 Mon Sep 17 00:24:39 MDT 2007 > Success Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Mon Sep 17 01:33:11 EDT 2007 > The first wget instruction in the wiki doesn't work. The Startup.current.tar.bz2 file is not there. Is there an alternate location or file name? Thanks. Gonzalo Delgado ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
re-sorry ... I followed the instractio by the wiki for testfarm ... i can't download (with wget) the startup.current.tar.bz2 ... the url that i tried is " http://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/daily-snapshots/ Startup.current.tar.bz2 " effectivly browsing " http://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/daily-snapshots/ " that file is not present ... i asked where is it ... thanks, marco Il giorno 15/feb/07, alle ore 18:04, Adam Fedor ha scritto: I guess there isn't one. You probable have to get it from SVN. I doubt that startup works with the most recent changes in make anyway. It's meant to work more with released versions of libraries. On Feb 15, 2007, at 6:45 AM, Marco Bardelli wrote: Sorry, where is the Startup.current.tar.bz2 ??? thanks marco ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Sorry, where is the Startup.current.tar.bz2 ??? thanks marco ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
OK, I was wrong, it should work, more-or-less with the current SVN (but it needs to be updated). I just looked on the ftp site and it's not there, but I don't know why. I'll have to find out. On Feb 15, 2007, at 11:00 AM, Marco Bardelli wrote: re-sorry ... I followed the instractio by the wiki for testfarm ... i can't download (with wget) the startup.current.tar.bz2 ... the url that i tried is " http://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/daily-snapshots/ Startup.current.tar.bz2 " effectivly browsing " http://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/daily-snapshots/ " that file is not present ... i asked where is it ... thanks, marco Il giorno 15/feb/07, alle ore 18:04, Adam Fedor ha scritto: I guess there isn't one. You probable have to get it from SVN. I doubt that startup works with the most recent changes in make anyway. It's meant to work more with released versions of libraries. On Feb 15, 2007, at 6:45 AM, Marco Bardelli wrote: Sorry, where is the Startup.current.tar.bz2 ??? thanks marco ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
I guess there isn't one. You probable have to get it from SVN. I doubt that startup works with the most recent changes in make anyway. It's meant to work more with released versions of libraries. On Feb 15, 2007, at 6:45 AM, Marco Bardelli wrote: Sorry, where is the Startup.current.tar.bz2 ??? thanks marco ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
RE: GNUstep Testfarm Results
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Fail Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.1 Thu Feb 15 03:54:19 CET
> 2007
>
> According to the logs, the reason for this was --
(...)
> I'm not sure why
> gnustep-config.in couldn't be found ... it's a file from subversion! Maybe
> it
> got deleted somehow ? Or an incomplete subversion update ?
I guess this was the bug:
alice: {7} svn up
svn: Failed to add file 'debugapp': object of the same name already exists
alice: {9} mv debugapp debugapp.org
alice: {10} svn up
Adebugapp
Agnustep-config.in
Afilesystem.csh.in
Afilesystem.make.in
Aprint_unique_pathlist.sh
U .
Updated to revision 24589.
Adam: could you please check? I am not familiar with your autobuild system...
Dave
--
_ _
_(_)(_)_ David Wetzel, Turbocat's Development,
(_) __ (_) Buchhorster Strasse 23, D-16567 Muehlenbeck/Berlin, FRG,
_/ \_ Fax +49 33056 82835 Phone +49 33056 82834
(__) http://www.turbocat.de/
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
RE: GNUstep Testfarm Results
> Fail Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.1 Thu Feb 15 03:54:19 CET 2007 According to the logs, the reason for this was -- config.status:753: creating config-noarch.make config.status:753: creating config.make config.status:753: creating openapp config.status:753: creating opentool config.status:753: creating executable.template config.status:753: creating GNUmakefile config.status:753: creating GNUstep.conf config.status:753: creating GNUstep.sh config.status:753: creating GNUstep.csh config.status:753: creating fixpath.sh config.status:753: creating gnustep-make.spec config.status:753: creating gnustep-config config.status:813: error: cannot find input file: gnustep-config.in I'm not sure why gnustep-config.in couldn't be found ... it's a file from subversion! Maybe it got deleted somehow ? Or an incomplete subversion update ? Thanks ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
RE: GNUstep Testfarm Results
> Fail Compile i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 Wed Feb 14 18:48:44 CST 2007 > Fail Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.1 Wed Feb 14 03:54:18 CET 2007 > Fail Compile powerpc-apple-darwin8.8.0 Tue Feb 13 13:00:36 CET 2007 > Fail Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Wed Feb 14 01:27:02 EST 2007 > Success Compile x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Wed Feb 14 04:10:05 GMT 2007 I think this 'Success' is spurious, it really failed! ;-) Thanks ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
RE: GNUstep Testfarm Results
I think I fixed those now. :-) We need to make sure we never reference the GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DIR variable (which isn't available any more if you install using GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DOMAIN, which is what we are doing everywhere on the GNUstep trunk). Instead we should use GNUSTEP_APPS, GNUSTEP_TOOLS, GNUSTEP_LIBRARY, GNUSTEP_HEADERS, GNUSTEP_LIBRARIES, GNUSTEP_DOCUMENTATION, GNUSTEP_DOCUMENTATION_MAN etc. to refer directly to the installation paths of a certain type. (the logic behind this is obvious; on a Linux FHS, GNUSTEP_APPS and GNUSTEP_TOOLS might be on completely different dirs) Also, anything using resource-set.make and installing using the new GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DOMAIN system should be upgraded to set the new xxx_INSTALL_DIR variable too. (since the old xxx_RESOURCE_FILES_INSTALL_DIR is based on GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DIR). Thanks -Original Message- From: Adam Fedor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wed, February 14, 2007 12:34 pm To: gnustep-dev@gnu.org Subject: GNUstep Testfarm Results Test results for GNUstep as of Wed Feb 14 06:34:23 EST 2007 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_testfarm.3F Fail Compile i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 Wed Feb 14 18:48:44 CST 2007 Fail Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.1 Wed Feb 14 03:54:18 CET 2007 Fail Compile powerpc-apple-darwin8.8.0 Tue Feb 13 13:00:36 CET 2007 Fail Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Wed Feb 14 01:27:02 EST 2007 Success Compile x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Wed Feb 14 04:10:05 GMT 2007 ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: > I actually quite like getting this report once a day ... but I won't > complain if others want it stopped when there are no problems. Actually I was quite suprised the other day that the test farm runs already NetBSD-3.1 (OK, just for a very short time period ;) dave PS: Anybody out there who wants to burn some time on NetBSD/sparc64 support? -- _ _ _(_)(_)_ David Wetzel, Turbocat's Development, (_) __ (_) Buchhorster Strasse 23, D-16567 Muehlenbeck/Berlin, FRG, _/ \_ Fax +49 33056 82835 Phone +49 33056 82834 (__) http://www.turbocat.de/ ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
On 29 Nov 2006, at 15:18, Adam Fedor wrote: Fine by me if people want that. I used to send it to the CVS list, but I can't do that anymore since we changed hosts. On Nov 29, 2006, at 6:07 AM, Nicola Pero wrote: Can we disable the alert email when everything is OK ? Or maybe only send it to Adam (or some volunteers) so he knows that the testing system is running ? I actually quite like getting this report once a day ... but I won't complain if others want it stopped when there are no problems. ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Fine by me if people want that. I used to send it to the CVS list, but I can't do that anymore since we changed hosts. On Nov 29, 2006, at 6:07 AM, Nicola Pero wrote: Can we disable the alert email when everything is OK ? Or maybe only send it to Adam (or some volunteers) so he knows that the testing system is running ? ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
RE: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Can we disable the alert email when everything is OK ? Or maybe only send it to Adam (or some volunteers) so he knows that the testing system is running ? Thanks -Original Message- From: "Adam Fedor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 12:34 pm To: gnustep-dev@gnu.org Subject: GNUstep Testfarm Results Test results for GNUstep as of Wed Nov 29 06:34:17 EST 2006 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_testfarm.3F Success Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.1 Wed Nov 29 03:56:34 CET 2006 Success Compile powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0 Wed Nov 29 03:09:36 MST 2006 Success Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Wed Nov 29 01:35:11 EST 2006 Success Compile x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Wed Nov 29 04:09:50 GMT 2006 ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
On 31 Oct 2006, at 11:34, Adam Fedor wrote: Test results for GNUstep as of Tue Oct 31 06:34:27 EST 2006 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/ Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_t estfarm.3F Success Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.0 Tue Oct 31 03:56:38 CET 2006 Fail Compile powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0 Tue Oct 31 03:14:01 MST 2006 I fixed this. ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
On 26 Oct 2006, at 11:34, Adam Fedor wrote: Test results for GNUstep as of Thu Oct 26 06:34:18 EDT 2006 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/ Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_t estfarm.3F Success Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.0 Thu Oct 26 03:56:38 CEST 2006 Success Compile powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0 Thu Oct 26 03:13:06 MDT 2006 Fail Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Thu Oct 26 01:23:50 EDT 2006 Hmm ... linking fix for recent Solaris (I needed it to get Solaris-10 on 64-bit AMD processors working) seems to have broken older versions. I've changed the configure script to check the compiler version and use the old '-G' flag when linking libraries if the compiler is earlier than 4.0 ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
On Oct 19, 2006, at 4:34 AM, Adam Fedor wrote: Test results for GNUstep as of Thu Oct 19 06:34:16 EDT 2006 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/ Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_te stfarm.3F Fail Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Thu Oct 19 01:21:01 EDT 2006 Sorry - for some reason svn couldn't be found and the source code wasn't updated properly. It's fixed now. ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
On 18 Oct 2006, at 22:06, Fred Kiefer wrote: Adam Fedor schrieb: Test results for GNUstep as of Wed Oct 18 06:34:16 EDT 2006 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/ Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_ testfarm.3F Success Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.0 Wed Oct 18 03:56:28 CEST 2006 Success Compile powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0 Wed Oct 18 03:09:24 MDT 2006 Fail Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Wed Oct 18 01:21:03 EDT 2006 Success Compile x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Wed Oct 18 04:09:57 BST 2006 Looking at the output of the failed solaris compilation I would say the the missing UNICODE_HEADERS varaible is causing this. Does anybody have an idea, what may have changed this Probably something I did trying to cleanup stuff. I wouldn't have noticed it as it seesms to be ok on other operating systems. and more importantly if the code in Makefile.postamble intalling these header would be of any real value? Can't see any .. they are just used internally. I would recommend to remove these lines. Sounds good to me ... I did it. We can always reinstate if there is some reason to do so we've missed. ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Adam Fedor schrieb: > Test results for GNUstep as of Wed Oct 18 06:34:16 EDT 2006 > If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will > be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm > > If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see > http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_can_I_take_part_with_a_GNUstep_autobuilder_for_the_testfarm.3F > > Success Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.0 Wed Oct 18 03:56:28 CEST 2006 > Success Compile powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0 Wed Oct 18 03:09:24 MDT 2006 > Fail Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Wed Oct 18 01:21:03 EDT 2006 > Success Compile x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Wed Oct 18 04:09:57 BST 2006 > Looking at the output of the failed solaris compilation I would say the the missing UNICODE_HEADERS varaible is causing this. Does anybody have an idea, what may have changed this and more importantly if the code in Makefile.postamble intalling these header would be of any real value? I would recommend to remove these lines. Cheers Fred ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
On Oct 3, 2006, at 7:44 AM, Matt Rice wrote: there were some logs in there yesterday when there were different host failures so i think it might just be a case of that specific host which continues to fail, failing to upload the file. Yes that's it. I've contacted the person responsible for that machine, but it's taking a while to get something done. Maybe I'll just filter it out. ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
--- Adrian Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 3, 2006, at 6:34 AM, Adam Fedor wrote: > > > ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm > > Hi Adam, > > As some others have mentioned, I've never been able > to see anything > at this FTP location. If it's a host problem, is > there any > possibility to use GNA, a different GNU server, or > some other server, > to host these logs? > there were some logs in there yesterday when there were different host failures so i think it might just be a case of that specific host which continues to fail, failing to upload the file. > Thanks. > > > > ___ > Gnustep-dev mailing list > Gnustep-dev@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev > __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
On Oct 3, 2006, at 6:34 AM, Adam Fedor wrote: ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm Hi Adam, As some others have mentioned, I've never been able to see anything at this FTP location. If it's a host problem, is there any possibility to use GNA, a different GNU server, or some other server, to host these logs? Thanks. ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
On Sep 20, 2006, at 5:25 AM, Nicola Pero wrote: Success Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.0 Wed Sep 20 03:56:58 CEST 2006 Fail Compile i686-pc-linux-gnu Tue Sep 19 22:23:54 CEST 2006 Success Compile powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0 Wed Sep 20 03:14:48 MDT 2006 Fail Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Wed Sep 20 01:54:59 EDT 2006 Success Compile x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Wed Sep 20 04:06:41 BST 2006 It looks like a 40% failure rate ... is there anything we need to/can do ? Are we supposed to ignore the testfarm results for now ? The sparc failure was caused by a bug in the test script (triggered by a change in gnustep-make) - which occurred before it creates the log files. I'll fix that. I don't know why the i686 logs aren't being uploaded. I'll check if it's a test-script failure or perhaps there's just a problem on that machine uploading the file. ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
RE: GNUstep Testfarm Results
> Test results for GNUstep as of Wed Sep 20 06:34:13 EDT 2006 > If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will > be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm I can't see anything in that directory ... > Success Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.0 Wed Sep 20 03:56:58 CEST 2006 > Fail Compile i686-pc-linux-gnu Tue Sep 19 22:23:54 CEST 2006 > Success Compile powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0 Wed Sep 20 03:14:48 MDT 2006 > Fail Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Wed Sep 20 01:54:59 EDT 2006 > Success Compile x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Wed Sep 20 04:06:41 BST 2006 It looks like a 40% failure rate ... is there anything we need to/can do ? Are we supposed to ignore the testfarm results for now ? Thanks ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
The log for i686 is not getting posted to the directory specified in the email. I would really like to see what the problem is here. Thanks, GJC --Gregory Casamento - Original Message From: Adam Fedor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: gnustep-dev@gnu.org Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 6:34:16 AM Subject: GNUstep Testfarm Results Test results for GNUstep as of Fri Sep 15 06:34:16 EDT 2006 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to add your machine to this list, set up a cron job (make sure you set up your PATH and other environment variables correctly) to run the Startup/scripts/test-gnustep script (see the script comments for more info). Success Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.0 Fri Sep 15 03:57:01 CEST 2006 Fail Compile i686-pc-linux-gnu Thu Sep 14 22:23:51 CEST 2006 Success Compile powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0 Fri Sep 15 03:14:59 MDT 2006 Success Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Fri Sep 15 02:10:10 EDT 2006 Success Compile x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Fri Sep 15 04:08:20 BST 2006 ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
