Re: New SPARC/ARL/ACRL Brochure on Open Access

2004-06-30 Thread Thomas Walker

At 09:05 PM 6/28/2004 +0100, Stevan Harnad wrote:

Prior Topic Thread:
Re: A Role for SPARC in Freeing the Refereed Literature
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/3806.html

SPARC, ARL, and ACRL have published a brochure on open access.
http://www.createchange.org/resources/brochure.html



deletion



This is a somewhat muddled comparison: There are two ways to provide OA
to an article: (1) to publish it in an OA journal or (2) to publish it
in a TA (i.e., subscription-toll-based) journal *and* to self-archive
it in an OA archive, as a supplement to the TA version, so all would-be
users can access it, whether or not their institutions can afford to
pay for access to the TA journal version.



In addition to OA and TA journals, there are journals that are both.  These
OA/TA journals offer OA to authors who are willing to pay for it; thus
issues usually contain both OA and TA articles.  The first publisher to
switch its journals from OA to OA/TA was the Entomological Society of
America.  It did so in 2000, and the next year another publisher did the
same.  Now at least three other publishers have made one or more of their
journals OA/TA.  Publishers who have switched are enjoying substantial
revenues from OA without foregoing their revenues from TA.  At the same
time they are providing a service that authors want and that TA journals do
not offer.  How much longer can the leaders of scientific societies resist
earning a profit by offering the OA that many of their authors are willing
to buy?

An attribute of OA/TA journals is that they permit a direct comparison of
the numbers of downloads for OA and TA articles.  For example, the American
Society of Limnology and Oceanography discovered that the OA articles in
its journal had been downloaded 2.8 times as often as TA articles after one
year.  After two years they had been downloaded 3.4 times as often.

For particulars about OA/TA journals and their publishers, see Open access
by the article: an idea whose time has come? at
http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/13.html .


For a presentation that describes open access by the article as one of two
routes to open access, go to
http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/epub/ALAtalk.htm .


For still more on open access by the article go to
http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/epub/ .



Thomas J. Walker
Professor Emeritus
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL


Re: Elsevier Gives Authors Green Light for Open Access Self-Archiving

2004-06-30 Thread Tim Brody

Regarding the article in the UK's Guardian newspaper:

Open access jeopardises academic publishers, Reed chief warns
Richard Wray, Wednesday June 30, 2004
http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/books/story/0,10595,1250591,00.html

At the end:

   Reed has, however, made some concessions towards the open access
   movement...  Alongside the rise of open access publishers, such as
   BioMed Central and PLoS, some academics are pushing for the right
   to place copies of articles they write for subscription journals on
   their own websites. Reed has changed its copyright rules to allow
   self-archiving in this way.

Tim Brody
Southampton University
http://citebase.eprints.org/